Is anybody watching the live debate on West Wing?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

imported_tss4

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2004
1,607
0
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
NTDZ, ShadesofGrey,

Perhaps, you should actually watch the show before replying next time. I'm not sure why the op felt the way he did, but most people I know (and that includes the conservatives thought it was very balanced). The Republican candidate is very impressive this time wich is a nice change from the previous time they did an election. The republican in that election was a joke. This time, however, they make the republican candidate as apealing as the democratic candidate.

I (and you should too) hope they do more shows like this on TV. It might actually put pressure on our real candidates to hold a real debate instead of the scripted junk we normally see.

I don't waste my time watching TV, but if I did, I sure wouldn't watch some fantasy political show. It's funny how some people look at the West Wing and believe it or believe that it should be true. It's a TV show, it's not real, it is written by people. People have this nasty habit of letting their own bias and views spill into their work. I haven't watched the show, nor do I want to, but I wouldn't be surprised if it starts to look like activism. There is a thread on here about Medicare for everyone, that was spawned from that show, so it looks like some people can't quite seperate reality from fantasy.


Yes, anyone with common sense could tell you any work of fiction has bias. But that doesn't mean that no ideas worth discussing can come from it. That's all he's trying to do and I don't understand your negative attitude about a reasonable discussion. Furthermore, the show last night was about a debate where the politicians actaully held a real debate (not the mockery of a debate we currently get). How can that be bad?
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
NTDZ, ShadesofGrey,

Perhaps, you should actually watch the show before replying next time. I'm not sure why the op felt the way he did, but most people I know (and that includes the conservatives thought it was very balanced). The Republican candidate is very impressive this time wich is a nice change from the previous time they did an election. The republican in that election was a joke. This time, however, they make the republican candidate as apealing as the democratic candidate.

I (and you should too) hope they do more shows like this on TV. It might actually put pressure on our real candidates to hold a real debate instead of the scripted junk we normally see.

I don't waste my time watching TV, but if I did, I sure wouldn't watch some fantasy political show. It's funny how some people look at the West Wing and believe it or believe that it should be true. It's a TV show, it's not real, it is written by people. People have this nasty habit of letting their own bias and views spill into their work. I haven't watched the show, nor do I want to, but I wouldn't be surprised if it starts to look like activism. There is a thread on here about Medicare for everyone, that was spawned from that show, so it looks like some people can't quite seperate reality from fantasy.


Yes, anyone with common sense could tell you any work of fiction has bias. But that doesn't mean that no ideas worth discussing can come from it. That's all he's trying to do and I don't understand your negative attitude about a reasonable discussion. Furthermore, the show last night was about a debate where the politicians actaully held a real debate (not the mockery of a debate we currently get). How can that be bad?

By "real debate" you mean a fictional and scripted debate on a fantasy TV show? Hey, I'm all for entertainment, but when people start letting their fantasy entertainment molding their ideals and politics - I laugh. It's absurd to think a TV show should be more than entertaiment, unless you advocate activist programming.
 

imported_tss4

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2004
1,607
0
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
NTDZ, ShadesofGrey,

Perhaps, you should actually watch the show before replying next time. I'm not sure why the op felt the way he did, but most people I know (and that includes the conservatives thought it was very balanced). The Republican candidate is very impressive this time wich is a nice change from the previous time they did an election. The republican in that election was a joke. This time, however, they make the republican candidate as apealing as the democratic candidate.

I (and you should too) hope they do more shows like this on TV. It might actually put pressure on our real candidates to hold a real debate instead of the scripted junk we normally see.

I don't waste my time watching TV, but if I did, I sure wouldn't watch some fantasy political show. It's funny how some people look at the West Wing and believe it or believe that it should be true. It's a TV show, it's not real, it is written by people. People have this nasty habit of letting their own bias and views spill into their work. I haven't watched the show, nor do I want to, but I wouldn't be surprised if it starts to look like activism. There is a thread on here about Medicare for everyone, that was spawned from that show, so it looks like some people can't quite seperate reality from fantasy.

then please stop trolling

first you start posting in this thread by just bashing liberals and not contributing anything and then you admit you didnt even watch the show which this thread is all about

Just pointing out the relevant info. It seems the left needs this fantasy world to help them with their politics. As you have seen, there are now atleast one thread that has taken something from the fantasy TV show and tried to suggest it be implemented. Kinda sad that people look to fantasy for their politics.

Thus the irony of it all, this fictional television show was less scripted than the real debates.
 

imported_tss4

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2004
1,607
0
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
NTDZ, ShadesofGrey,

Perhaps, you should actually watch the show before replying next time. I'm not sure why the op felt the way he did, but most people I know (and that includes the conservatives thought it was very balanced). The Republican candidate is very impressive this time wich is a nice change from the previous time they did an election. The republican in that election was a joke. This time, however, they make the republican candidate as apealing as the democratic candidate.

I (and you should too) hope they do more shows like this on TV. It might actually put pressure on our real candidates to hold a real debate instead of the scripted junk we normally see.

I don't waste my time watching TV, but if I did, I sure wouldn't watch some fantasy political show. It's funny how some people look at the West Wing and believe it or believe that it should be true. It's a TV show, it's not real, it is written by people. People have this nasty habit of letting their own bias and views spill into their work. I haven't watched the show, nor do I want to, but I wouldn't be surprised if it starts to look like activism. There is a thread on here about Medicare for everyone, that was spawned from that show, so it looks like some people can't quite seperate reality from fantasy.


Yes, anyone with common sense could tell you any work of fiction has bias. But that doesn't mean that no ideas worth discussing can come from it. That's all he's trying to do and I don't understand your negative attitude about a reasonable discussion. Furthermore, the show last night was about a debate where the politicians actaully held a real debate (not the mockery of a debate we currently get). How can that be bad?

By "real debate" you mean a fictional and scripted debate on a fantasy TV show? Hey, I'm all for entertainment, but when people start letting their fantasy entertainment molding their ideals and politics - I laugh. It's absurd to think a TV show should be more than entertaiment, unless you advocate activist programming.

Movies and television are no different from books. They have always, since the beginning saught to educate, inform, and persuade. Some if its very biased, some of its not. But unless you never consider any of the ideas you read, see or hear, then your criticism is unjustified.

And lets be honest here, that show didn't from his opinion of politics. It just presented an idea that he is now looking for more information on by posting here.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
NTDZ, ShadesofGrey,

Perhaps, you should actually watch the show before replying next time. I'm not sure why the op felt the way he did, but most people I know (and that includes the conservatives thought it was very balanced). The Republican candidate is very impressive this time wich is a nice change from the previous time they did an election. The republican in that election was a joke. This time, however, they make the republican candidate as apealing as the democratic candidate.

I (and you should too) hope they do more shows like this on TV. It might actually put pressure on our real candidates to hold a real debate instead of the scripted junk we normally see.

I don't waste my time watching TV, but if I did, I sure wouldn't watch some fantasy political show. It's funny how some people look at the West Wing and believe it or believe that it should be true. It's a TV show, it's not real, it is written by people. People have this nasty habit of letting their own bias and views spill into their work. I haven't watched the show, nor do I want to, but I wouldn't be surprised if it starts to look like activism. There is a thread on here about Medicare for everyone, that was spawned from that show, so it looks like some people can't quite seperate reality from fantasy.

then please stop trolling

first you start posting in this thread by just bashing liberals and not contributing anything and then you admit you didnt even watch the show which this thread is all about

Just pointing out the relevant info. It seems the left needs this fantasy world to help them with their politics. As you have seen, there are now atleast one thread that has taken something from the fantasy TV show and tried to suggest it be implemented. Kinda sad that people look to fantasy for their politics.
The real fantasy was that both the Candidates portrayed seemed worthy of the position of President unlike those of the last two Presidential Elections. Maybe it is a pipe dream to want to have men like that vying for the leadership of our country.

 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
NTDZ, ShadesofGrey,

Perhaps, you should actually watch the show before replying next time. I'm not sure why the op felt the way he did, but most people I know (and that includes the conservatives thought it was very balanced). The Republican candidate is very impressive this time wich is a nice change from the previous time they did an election. The republican in that election was a joke. This time, however, they make the republican candidate as apealing as the democratic candidate.

I (and you should too) hope they do more shows like this on TV. It might actually put pressure on our real candidates to hold a real debate instead of the scripted junk we normally see.

I don't waste my time watching TV, but if I did, I sure wouldn't watch some fantasy political show. It's funny how some people look at the West Wing and believe it or believe that it should be true. It's a TV show, it's not real, it is written by people. People have this nasty habit of letting their own bias and views spill into their work. I haven't watched the show, nor do I want to, but I wouldn't be surprised if it starts to look like activism. There is a thread on here about Medicare for everyone, that was spawned from that show, so it looks like some people can't quite seperate reality from fantasy.


Yes, anyone with common sense could tell you any work of fiction has bias. But that doesn't mean that no ideas worth discussing can come from it. That's all he's trying to do and I don't understand your negative attitude about a reasonable discussion. Furthermore, the show last night was about a debate where the politicians actaully held a real debate (not the mockery of a debate we currently get). How can that be bad?

By "real debate" you mean a fictional and scripted debate on a fantasy TV show? Hey, I'm all for entertainment, but when people start letting their fantasy entertainment molding their ideals and politics - I laugh. It's absurd to think a TV show should be more than entertaiment, unless you advocate activist programming.

Movies and television are no different from books. They have always, since the beginning saught to educate, inform, and persuade. Some if its very biased, some of its not. But unless you never consider any of the ideas you read, see or hear, then your criticism is unjustified.

And lets be honest here, that show didn't from his opinion of politics. It just presented an idea that he is now looking for more information on by posting here.

Activist programming under the guise of entertainment. Brilliant!

Discussion on issues is great, I support discussion, but to have the entertainment industry drive or push it is funny. It's no different than the so-called news we have today in America. They print/air what they want to air as it suits their activism/bias. Both sides are guilty as I've stated in other threads. Mixing news and entertainment is bad because it blurs the lines of both which does no one any good.
 

imported_tss4

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2004
1,607
0
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey


Activist programming under the guise of entertainment. Brilliant!

You just described every great work of fiction in history. Are all the ideas contained in them worthless?
 

imported_tss4

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2004
1,607
0
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Discussion on issues is great, I support discussion, but to have the entertainment industry drive or push it is funny. It's no different than the so-called news we have today in America. They print/air what they want to air as it suits their activism/bias. Both sides are guilty as I've stated in other threads. Mixing news and entertainment is bad because it blurs the lines of both which does no one any good.

There's a huge difference between the news which bills itself as real facts/ non fiction promoting an agenda VS a clearly fictional TV show promoting an agenda.
 

OneOfTheseDays

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2000
7,052
0
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
NTDZ, ShadesofGrey,

Perhaps, you should actually watch the show before replying next time. I'm not sure why the op felt the way he did, but most people I know (and that includes the conservatives thought it was very balanced). The Republican candidate is very impressive this time wich is a nice change from the previous time they did an election. The republican in that election was a joke. This time, however, they make the republican candidate as apealing as the democratic candidate.

I (and you should too) hope they do more shows like this on TV. It might actually put pressure on our real candidates to hold a real debate instead of the scripted junk we normally see.

I don't waste my time watching TV, but if I did, I sure wouldn't watch some fantasy political show. It's funny how some people look at the West Wing and believe it or believe that it should be true. It's a TV show, it's not real, it is written by people. People have this nasty habit of letting their own bias and views spill into their work. I haven't watched the show, nor do I want to, but I wouldn't be surprised if it starts to look like activism. There is a thread on here about Medicare for everyone, that was spawned from that show, so it looks like some people can't quite seperate reality from fantasy.


Yes, anyone with common sense could tell you any work of fiction has bias. But that doesn't mean that no ideas worth discussing can come from it. That's all he's trying to do and I don't understand your negative attitude about a reasonable discussion. Furthermore, the show last night was about a debate where the politicians actaully held a real debate (not the mockery of a debate we currently get). How can that be bad?

By "real debate" you mean a fictional and scripted debate on a fantasy TV show? Hey, I'm all for entertainment, but when people start letting their fantasy entertainment molding their ideals and politics - I laugh. It's absurd to think a TV show should be more than entertaiment, unless you advocate activist programming.

Movies and television are no different from books. They have always, since the beginning saught to educate, inform, and persuade. Some if its very biased, some of its not. But unless you never consider any of the ideas you read, see or hear, then your criticism is unjustified.

And lets be honest here, that show didn't from his opinion of politics. It just presented an idea that he is now looking for more information on by posting here.

Activist programming under the guise of entertainment. Brilliant!

Discussion on issues is great, I support discussion, but to have the entertainment industry drive or push it is funny. It's no different than the so-called news we have today in America. They print/air what they want to air as it suits their activism/bias. Both sides are guilty as I've stated in other threads. Mixing news and entertainment is bad because it blurs the lines of both which does no one any good.

Quite feeding the troll. It is quite clear he only wants to ruin any reasonable discussion going on in this thread. If he were seriously interested in not being a troll he would stop posting in this thread immediately. But he won't, he will drag this thread on to many more pages as he tries to defend his completely moronic point of view. Everyone here is aware that the show is FICTION, that's not the point. The point is that the show brings up many relevant issues that many feel are worth discussing. If you don't feel the same way, kindly stop posting and ruining this thread Shades.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Discussion on issues is great, I support discussion, but to have the entertainment industry drive or push it is funny. It's no different than the so-called news we have today in America. They print/air what they want to air as it suits their activism/bias. Both sides are guilty as I've stated in other threads. Mixing news and entertainment is bad because it blurs the lines of both which does no one any good.
Ya know you didn't even see this program and yet you are labeling it "Activism". :roll:Frankly I think it was totally the opposite of any activism what so ever. What it did do was have actors portray candidates debating the major differences in political philosophies of the parties in a very fair and I might say appealing way. In fact I would go on further to say that the Republican Candidate Character played by Alan Alda described the Republican view better than any of the prominent Republican Politicians have lately and light years better than Bush ever could. He definately wasn't a stiff assholish Cheney.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: tss4
NTDZ, ShadesofGrey,

Perhaps, you should actually watch the show before replying next time. I'm not sure why the op felt the way he did, but most people I know (and that includes the conservatives thought it was very balanced). The Republican candidate is very impressive this time wich is a nice change from the previous time they did an election. The republican in that election was a joke. This time, however, they make the republican candidate as apealing as the democratic candidate.

I (and you should too) hope they do more shows like this on TV. It might actually put pressure on our real candidates to hold a real debate instead of the scripted junk we normally see.

I don't waste my time watching TV, but if I did, I sure wouldn't watch some fantasy political show. It's funny how some people look at the West Wing and believe it or believe that it should be true. It's a TV show, it's not real, it is written by people. People have this nasty habit of letting their own bias and views spill into their work. I haven't watched the show, nor do I want to, but I wouldn't be surprised if it starts to look like activism. There is a thread on here about Medicare for everyone, that was spawned from that show, so it looks like some people can't quite seperate reality from fantasy.

Yea, people like you specifically.
 

doody

Junior Member
Oct 30, 2005
23
0
0
Huh? Whats the point of this thread?

In the real debates last year bushco made himself look silly and out of his depth, whats wrong with TV actually reflecting the real world in an accurate manner?
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: doody
Huh? Whats the point of this thread?

In the real debates last year bushco made himself look silly and out of his depth, whats wrong with TV actually reflecting the real world in an accurate manner?
Maybe they were fantisizing on what a debate would look like if we actually had worthwhile cadidates running.
 

doody

Junior Member
Oct 30, 2005
23
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: doody
Huh? Whats the point of this thread?

In the real debates last year bushco made himself look silly and out of his depth, whats wrong with TV actually reflecting the real world in an accurate manner?
Maybe they were fantisizing on what a debate would look like if we actually had worthwhile cadidates running.


Oh, I see, but why do they care? they got what they wanted, another 4 years to rob the country, who cares if bushco makes himself look like a fool?
 

maddogchen

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2004
8,903
2
76
I like that Republican, Alan Alda's, answer to what will help Africa, Tax cuts. What did you guys think of that? Is it true? Is it tv fiction?

His answer was that all our debt relief and charity won't help very much but that tax cuts for the poor would help build capital and help build their infrastructure, health care, and encourage economic development? That the reason they have high taxes is to prove to the Western world that they can repay their debts. And that by doing both debt relief and urging them to cut taxes, it will help them more than our charity ever will?
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
The african thing was really interesting, I can't imagine that discussion ever taking place in a national presidential debate, which is unfortunate.

The bullet thing was really dumb

The medicare thing was interesting, and hopefully some serious debate would be sparked as a result of the portrayal of this issue (ShadesofGrey aside...)

The debate of ideologies was what this really was about. I found that I liked more of what the republican had to say than the democrat. At one point, even Santos made a comment to the audience, "Not to sound Alarmist but..." and I immediately thought...TOO LATE. :)



 

imported_tss4

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2004
1,607
0
0
Originally posted by: OrByte
The african thing was really interesting, I can't imagine that discussion ever taking place in a national presidential debate, which is unfortunate.

The bullet thing was really dumb

The medicare thing was interesting, and hopefully some serious debate would be sparked as a result of the portrayal of this issue (ShadesofGrey aside...)

The debate of ideologies was what this really was about. I found that I liked more of what the republican had to say than the democrat. At one point, even Santos made a comment to the audience, "Not to sound Alarmist but..." and I immediately thought...TOO LATE. :)

That's true. Another interesting point was the stuff about head start. I had no idea that by 5th grade kids on head start did no better than those not on head start. In addition, I didn't realize that the fed only contributes about 7 cents of every dollar spent on education.

 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: OrByte
The african thing was really interesting, I can't imagine that discussion ever taking place in a national presidential debate, which is unfortunate.

The bullet thing was really dumb

The medicare thing was interesting, and hopefully some serious debate would be sparked as a result of the portrayal of this issue (ShadesofGrey aside...)

The debate of ideologies was what this really was about. I found that I liked more of what the republican had to say than the democrat. At one point, even Santos made a comment to the audience, "Not to sound Alarmist but..." and I immediately thought...TOO LATE. :)

That's true. Another interesting point was the stuff about head start. I had no idea that by 5th grade kids on head start did no better than those not on head start. In addition, I didn't realize that the fed only contributes about 7 cents of every dollar spent on education.

yeah the education exchange was interesting but I didnt like either "candidates" plan. The Demo wanted to implement "ideas" and the Repub didnt say much of anything about education. At least with the health insurance issue an option was thrown out there for people to talk about.

Education, imho, there are no easy answers. I think the problem is more a social issue than economic issue or anything else, but I dont know anywhere near enough to rant philosophical about it.

 

AreaCode707

Lifer
Sep 21, 2001
18,447
133
106
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: HotChic
Well, they're wrapping up the debate and it looks like they decided to give Alda the stronger closing statement. So, in my eyes, the west coast version went from dem favored, to even, to republican favored. I do wonder how it contrasts with the earlier version.


Earlier version? I saw the same thing here on the east coast as you did on the west coast (i believe). I thought it kinda swung from dem to repub at the end.
All in all I thought it was extrememly fair and very interesting.
I would like to see this kind of debate, with extended time at least 4-5 times in every Presidential election.


They performed it live twice, once for east, once for west. So there were two versions.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Don't rock the boat. The left likes to live in their little fantasy world so if this gives them their fantasy - so be it.
Grow up. All you do is bleat propaganda points. Same goes for ntdz. Mindless attacks against anything other than your BushCo party line.

:roll: Grow up and find someone else to whine about. All you do is run around like a spoiled baby and whine about what you think others are doing. Why don't you address what they are saying instead of trying to flippantly dismiss it? Do you really think leftists don't dream and wish the West Wing was reality? Get a grip junior, try reality for once.

I personally don't think wish the West Wing was reality. Are there people who do? Probably, but are there people on the right who wish fighting terrorism was like a Bruce Willis movie? Probably :D

Some people just can't deal with reality, and television is a nice break from it. But there is a line.