• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is amalgam (silver tooth filling) poisonous?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: markgm
It's like saying salt is poisonous because it contains chlorine from what I was told. I've had a few amalgam fillings and they've been replaced with white fillings for aesthetic reasons.

This is exactly correct. The chemical bond in the mercury is so strong that anything with enough energy to break that bond would cause severe damage to the body.

So...if you drink some hydrocloric acid or heat your teeth to 800F ...yeah, you might get mercury poisoning 😉
 
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Don't trust the ADA. They have conflicting interests, just like the dealer you take your car to for work, the informercial trying to sell you razors that last forever, etc. It's pretty incredible how trusting so many in this thread are, yet I bet you are the same ones who trust the quack creationism proving studies.

I think that keeping their patients alive so they remain patients is a pretty high priority too.
 
so basically all of you are ok with using extremely toxic poison in your mouth so long as you don't notice the damaging effects? 😕
 
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Don't trust the ADA. They have conflicting interests, just like the dealer you take your car to for work, the informercial trying to sell you razors that last forever, etc. It's pretty incredible how trusting so many in this thread are, yet I bet you are the same ones who trust the quack creationism proving studies.

I think that keeping their patients alive so they remain patients is a pretty high priority too.

This post shows your ignorance. Mercury doesn't kill in these concentrations. It does cause brain damage. Why should a dentist care if his patients sustain a little brain damage?


Why are people still posting that the bonds can't be broken? THE FDA SAYS THAT MERCURY IS RELEASED. If it wasn't released from the amalgam, NO ONE WOULD HAVE A REACTION OF ANY KIND.
 
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Don't trust the ADA. They have conflicting interests, just like the dealer you take your car to for work, the informercial trying to sell you razors that last forever, etc. It's pretty incredible how trusting so many in this thread are, yet I bet you are the same ones who trust the quack creationism proving studies.

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/amalgams.html

3. What are the safety concerns about dental amalgam?
When amalgam fillings are placed in teeth or removed from teeth, they release mercury vapor. Mercury vapor is also released during chewing. Some people believe that this mercury vapor can cause health problems, including neurological disorders, in certain sensitive individuals.



Whether there are studies showing that it's hazardous to health is beside the point. Has there been a 50 year study? What are they based on? Diagnosed mental and health problems. When was the last time any of us went to a shrink to diagnose our mental disorders?
The fact that the mercury accumulates in your brain and other organs, and causes neurological disorders in even some people (which means it's causing neurological damage to everyone) is reason enough to not use them.

THE SKY IS FALLING!!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!

Did you read my post, or do you just dismiss anything that causes you to think? It's easy to just rattle off about some studies without actually considering what those studies involve isn't it?
I'm not surprised. That is exactly the kind of trite, meaningless posting I'd expect from you. I'm surprised you didn't post something about your dental sexuality to get attention.

 
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Don't trust the ADA. They have conflicting interests, just like the dealer you take your car to for work, the informercial trying to sell you razors that last forever, etc. It's pretty incredible how trusting so many in this thread are, yet I bet you are the same ones who trust the quack creationism proving studies.

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/amalgams.html

3. What are the safety concerns about dental amalgam?
When amalgam fillings are placed in teeth or removed from teeth, they release mercury vapor. Mercury vapor is also released during chewing. Some people believe that this mercury vapor can cause health problems, including neurological disorders, in certain sensitive individuals.



Whether there are studies showing that it's hazardous to health is beside the point. Has there been a 50 year study? What are they based on? Diagnosed mental and health problems. When was the last time any of us went to a shrink to diagnose our mental disorders?
The fact that the mercury accumulates in your brain and other organs, and causes neurological disorders in even some people (which means it's causing neurological damage to everyone) is reason enough to not use them.

THE SKY IS FALLING!!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!

Did you read my post, or do you just dismiss anything that causes you to think? It's easy to just rattle off about some studies without actually considering what those studies involve isn't it?
I'm not surprised. That is exactly the kind of trite, meaningless posting I'd expect from you. I'm surprised you didn't post something about your dental sexuality to get attention.
Stop acting like a brainwashed alarmist conspiracy theorist twit.
Not only are you full of shit you are full of yourself.

READ THIS, and try to debunk the whole article.

http://www.quackwatch.org/01Qu...tedTopics/mercury.html

I'm surprised you didn't post something about your dental sexuality to get attention.
Where do you come off saying that?
YOU, Chicken Little, are the one trying to get attention here.



 
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Don't trust the ADA. They have conflicting interests, just like the dealer you take your car to for work, the informercial trying to sell you razors that last forever, etc. It's pretty incredible how trusting so many in this thread are, yet I bet you are the same ones who trust the quack creationism proving studies.

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/amalgams.html

3. What are the safety concerns about dental amalgam?
When amalgam fillings are placed in teeth or removed from teeth, they release mercury vapor. Mercury vapor is also released during chewing. Some people believe that this mercury vapor can cause health problems, including neurological disorders, in certain sensitive individuals.



Whether there are studies showing that it's hazardous to health is beside the point. Has there been a 50 year study? What are they based on? Diagnosed mental and health problems. When was the last time any of us went to a shrink to diagnose our mental disorders?
The fact that the mercury accumulates in your brain and other organs, and causes neurological disorders in even some people (which means it's causing neurological damage to everyone) is reason enough to not use them.

THE SKY IS FALLING!!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!

Did you read my post, or do you just dismiss anything that causes you to think? It's easy to just rattle off about some studies without actually considering what those studies involve isn't it?
I'm not surprised. That is exactly the kind of trite, meaningless posting I'd expect from you. I'm surprised you didn't post something about your dental sexuality to get attention.
Stop acting like a brainwashed alarmist conspiracy theorist twit.
Not only are you full of shit you are full of yourself.

READ THIS, and try to debunk the whole article.

http://www.quackwatch.org/01Qu...tedTopics/mercury.html

I'm surprised you didn't post something about your dental sexuality to get attention.
Where do you come off saying that?
YOU, Chicken Little, are the one trying to get attention here.

Biased special interest junk. Did you read the whole article? It quotes very small scale studies, to prove something it set out to prove.
Why do YOU think that any amount of mercury in your tissues is alright because most people don't develop noticeable symptoms? We've already established that the mercury is released, despite repeated claims by the "pro-algamists" that it is not.
Do you just believe that mercury is safe? Would you eat albacore tuna if you were pregnant in spite of the FDA's recommendations?

My stance on brain damage is that NONE is better than slight undiagnosed brain damage.

"alarmist" "conspiracy theory twit" "quack"
Nice use of buzzwords!

If you have amalgam in your mouth, fine, leave it there.. but it's time to move on to the freaking 21st century and use composite. We don't use lead pipes anymore, even though you show no symptoms of lead poisoning until you've drank from them for a long time. I spent half my life in a country that still used leaded gas and I don't show any symptoms. Should we give people the alternative of leaded gas in the US?

BTW:
http://www.canlyme.com/quackwatch.html

Your Dr. Barrett does not have a medical license.
 
I got mine replaced with ceramic a few years back.
Aside from Mercury, amalgam is ugly, and it requires bigger hole to be drilled.
 
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
The internet is so empowering to the gulible. The CIA killed Lincoln too.

Are you arguing that mercury is not extremely poisonous? Which part are you arguing.....
Mercury is poisonous. So is water. It is the dose that makes the poison. Rattlesnakes are not poisonous, but their venom can kill you.

 
Originally posted by: gsellis
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
The internet is so empowering to the gulible. The CIA killed Lincoln too.

Are you arguing that mercury is not extremely poisonous? Which part are you arguing.....
Mercury is poisonous. So is water. It is the dose that makes the poison. Rattlesnakes are not poisonous, but their venom can kill you.

I can assure you water is not a poison. 😕
 
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
The internet is so empowering to the gulible. The CIA killed Lincoln too.

Are you arguing that mercury is not extremely poisonous? Which part are you arguing.....
Mercury is poisonous. So is water. It is the dose that makes the poison. Rattlesnakes are not poisonous, but their venom can kill you.

I can assure you water is not a poison. 😕
You lose. 😉 Wiki

Edit for missing smiley
 
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
The internet is so empowering to the gulible. The CIA killed Lincoln too.

Are you arguing that mercury is not extremely poisonous? Which part are you arguing.....
Mercury is poisonous. So is water. It is the dose that makes the poison. Rattlesnakes are not poisonous, but their venom can kill you.

I can assure you water is not a poison. 😕

Water is most certainly a poison. Ever heard of hyponatremia?

He is correct that the dose of any substance is the determination of its toxological effects. Oxygen is a poison as well.

Anyway, the bioavailability of mercury metal in fillings is ridiculously low. Mercury metal (in the 0 oxidation state) is not terribly dangerous, as your body isn't really "exposed" to it much, meaning the mercury can't wander in and out of cells, or otherwise do damage. However, when organic groups get attached to it, like methyl groups (resulting in dimethyl mercury), it becomes much more toxic. It is more lipophilic and therefore its bioavailability shoots up. Now it can move freely through cell membranes and start interacting with proteins and DNA.
 
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
The internet is so empowering to the gulible. The CIA killed Lincoln too.

Are you arguing that mercury is not extremely poisonous? Which part are you arguing.....
Mercury is poisonous. So is water. It is the dose that makes the poison. Rattlesnakes are not poisonous, but their venom can kill you.

I can assure you water is not a poison. 😕

I think he was pointing out anything is poisonous in certain doses. While there is a Grand Canyon sized gap between the doses of water and mercury as far as lethality, it is a good point to remember.

I have 5 amalgam fillings, and I am pretty sure I was mad as a hatter before I got them. I am not sure either way, but I definitely do not care enough to read a bunch of boring dental articles. 😛
 
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
The internet is so empowering to the gulible. The CIA killed Lincoln too.

Are you arguing that mercury is not extremely poisonous? Which part are you arguing.....

I hope you don't eat fish...


Only a very tiny minority of persons (or "certain sensitive individuals" as the FDA says) are susceptible to suffering neurological damage from the minuscule dosage of mercury we're talking about here.
 
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
This post shows your ignorance. Mercury doesn't kill in these concentrations. It does cause brain damage. Why should a dentist care if his patients sustain a little brain damage?

Odd then that these same dentists have no reservations with putting amalgams in their own mouths or in the mouths of their family. It's cause they don't care, right? OH SNAP! They're in its for teh evil! :Q
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
This post shows your ignorance. Mercury doesn't kill in these concentrations. It does cause brain damage. Why should a dentist care if his patients sustain a little brain damage?

Odd then that these same dentists have no reservations with putting amalgams in their own mouths or in the mouths of their family. It's cause they don't care, right? OH SNAP! They're in its for teh evil! :Q

They may not care that much about themselves either. There are plenty of fat doctors. Or they probably buy into the reassurances from the ADA. It feels a lot better and is easier to believe that studies don't show harmfulness (but some apparently do) and go with that.
I'd rather be conservative and stick with no neorological damage vs accepting a little to save money.

Think of all the smart people you knew in college who were 100% sure that LSD, cocaine, heroine, cigarettes, and alcohol are harmless if you don't use too much.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
The internet is so empowering to the gulible. The CIA killed Lincoln too.

Are you arguing that mercury is not extremely poisonous? Which part are you arguing.....

I hope you don't eat fish...


Only a very tiny minority of persons (or "certain sensitive individuals" as the FDA says) are susceptible to suffering neurological damage from the minuscule dosage of mercury we're talking about here.

Point is. Why continue to use a poison at all just because you are not noticing the effects. This doesn't make sense at all when there are better alternatives.
 
Originally posted by: Captain Howdy
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: gsellis
The internet is so empowering to the gulible. The CIA killed Lincoln too.

Are you arguing that mercury is not extremely poisonous? Which part are you arguing.....
Mercury is poisonous. So is water. It is the dose that makes the poison. Rattlesnakes are not poisonous, but their venom can kill you.

I can assure you water is not a poison. 😕

I think he was pointing out anything is poisonous in certain doses. While there is a Grand Canyon sized gap between the doses of water and mercury as far as lethality, it is a good point to remember.

I have 5 amalgam fillings, and I am pretty sure I was mad as a hatter before I got them. I am not sure either way, but I definitely do not care enough to read a bunch of boring dental articles. 😛

no the logic is flawed. Humans cannot live without water. humans can live fine without poison.
 
I think that since it's so controversial and apparently there is simply not enough information or evidence to prove it is safe or it is dangerous the best is to just avoid it whenever possible. Maybe you won't have to get current amalgam fillings removed but at least don't let a dentist put them in your mouth in the future. If you have the choice, why choose something potentially hazardous? It's like buying a house to raise your family near an industrial waste dump. Sure they say it's safe and it might as well be, but do you really want to take the risk? You could get another house across town...
 
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
no the logic is flawed. Humans cannot live without water. humans can live fine without poison.
There are many poisons that humans can live with and without. But being there does not make them a poison. Some poisons are essential! Some of the vitamins are especially bad in high doses. Digitalis is a very dangerous toxin, unless you have certain heart conditions. Then your life is short without it.

Don't eat anything organic! Organics contain Carbon and Nitrogen. Those are the main ingredients of Cyanide!

Too much poly-saturated Oyxgen will kill you!
 
Back
Top