Is a 1.0 TB Hard drive false advertising?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
Originally posted by: jagec
When I went to Canada, I saw a speed limit sign that said "Maximum 100" I went 100 mph, and got pulled over. The cops told me they use km/h in Canada, but that wasn't on the sign.

Waaah I should sue. I would have a greater chance of winning than the hard drive scenario, where they clearly indicate what units they're using on the box.

meters/second ?
 

Mark R

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,513
16
81
Originally posted by: CadetLee
Yeah, yeah, 1Tb = 1024Gb, 1Gb = 1024Mb, etc. However, that's not how they're advertised, is it?

Or am I missing something incredibly obvious?

The idea of 1GB = 1024MB, 1TB = 1024 GB has only ever been used consistently for RAM sizing, or in software.

For all other times when storage has been used, it's been much more common to use 1 GB = 1000 MB, 1TB = 1000 GB. This is the 'official' definition, and this is the definition used to advertise hard drives.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
1 TB is 10^12 bytes. Windows thinks 1TB is 2^40 bytes, though. Do some math and you'll figure it out.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
Originally posted by: Syringer
This is the STUPIDEST topic known to mankind in the history of the world. Get the fck over it.

i liked u better when u were permabanned
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,360
5,509
136
AAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

Being that we are on a tech forum, one would think most of us will know the difference between decimal and binary.
 

AndrewR

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,157
0
0
Originally posted by: CadetLee
Originally posted by: Quasmo
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
what IS the purpose of removing a certain % of the space? Is it about 2-3% that the drive 'removes' or put as overhead?

What I'm saying is that every time we go to a higher plateau we lose more and more of a % off of the drive.

The percentage stays the same, does it not?

Fixed, btw. ;)

Thank you! Let loose the dogs of grammar! :D
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: CadetLee
Originally posted by: Quasmo
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
what IS the purpose of removing a certain % of the space? Is it about 2-3% that the drive 'removes' or put as overhead?

What I'm saying is that every time we go to a higher plateau we lose more and more of a % off of the drive.

The percentage stays the same, does it not?

Fixed, btw. ;)

Thank you! Let loose the dogs of grammar! :D

@CadetLee - the percentage stays the same until you change units. Then the percentage increases.

1000 vs 1024 = 2.4% (KB)
1000000 vs 1048576 = 4.8% (MB)
1000000000 vs 1073741824 = 7.4% (GB)
1000000000000 vs 1099511627776 = 10% (TB)


 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Thank you! Let loose the dogs of grammar! :D
:beer::D

Originally posted by: mugs
@CadetLee - the percentage stays the same until you change units. Then the percentage increases.

1000 vs 1024 = 2.4% (KB)
1000000 vs 1048576 = 4.8% (MB)
1000000000 vs 1073741824 = 7.4% (GB)
1000000000000 vs 1099511627776 = 10% (TB)

Ahh, that makes sense.
 

Steve

Lifer
May 2, 2004
15,945
11
81
Originally posted by: clickynext
They should denote the binary unit using a different name since the "Giga" prefix by definition is base10. The "GiB = 1024 MiB" convention that's already in place should work fine, but I guess it's not good for marketing to change over.

The different name is Gibibytes, but nobody uses it.

Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
Originally posted by: Quasmo
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
what IS the purpose of removing a certain % of the space? Is it about 2-3% that the drive 'removes' or put as overhead?

What I'm saying is that every time we go to a higher plateau we loose more and more of a % off of the drive.

you sure? I think it has been withing 2-5% .. roughly.

It may depend on the manuf. but I have no proof of that.

5% in the MB range, 7% in the GB range, 9% in the TB range.

Ninja Edit: I see mugs has gone into further detail.
 

Quasmo

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2004
9,630
1
76
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: CadetLee
Originally posted by: Quasmo
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
what IS the purpose of removing a certain % of the space? Is it about 2-3% that the drive 'removes' or put as overhead?

What I'm saying is that every time we go to a higher plateau we lose more and more of a % off of the drive.

The percentage stays the same, does it not?

Fixed, btw. ;)

Thank you! Let loose the dogs of grammar! :D

@CadetLee - the percentage stays the same until you change units. Then the percentage increases.

1000 vs 1024 = 2.4% (KB)
1000000 vs 1048576 = 4.8% (MB)
1000000000 vs 1073741824 = 7.4% (GB)
1000000000000 vs 1099511627776 = 10% (TB)

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT!!!

I'm saying I would rather buy a 1000 GB harddrive rather than a 1.0TB hard drive.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Steve
The different name is Gibibytes, but nobody uses it.

Exactly. ;) I doubt even the tightasses who are giving Quasmo a hard time have ever said "Gibibyte" in real life. You see GiB all the time on the Internet nowadays, but I've never heard anyone say it in real life.
 

SuperSix

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,872
2
0
Quit yer bitchin'.

Make a scene next time you go to Burger King and the burger you get looks nothing like the one you saw the King pimping last week.

;)
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: Quasmo
So hard drive manufacturers started releasing "1.0 TB" Hard drives that actually show up in windows as 931 GBs. Should Hard drive manufacturers start making drives that are actually 1.0 TBs now that they've reached a new plataeu?

I'm sick of this "false" advertising.

As of now the 1 TB drives that ship in reality need another 100GBs to actually show up as a 1 TB drive in windows, that's almost 10% of the drive itself.

I'm saying that now that they've hit a new era in hard drives they should start making them with a more accurate measurement.

Hmm like ah, dude; this had been happening for a LOOONG time now.

You know a lot of processors actually run a little faster or slower due to clocking deviations too.