• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is 3.83 GPA bad?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
GPA only gets you an interview, if you are not actually smart they will find out then (I have met plenty of people with high GPA that had no common sense and couldn't remember the basics of the class they got an A in last semester). 5 years after college no one will care what grades you got, they will instead look at work history.

Remember this tidbit of wisdom a friend told me in college: "C's get degrees"
 
Originally posted by: Brentx
Just make sure you have extra cirriculars. That is the most important in my book. Colleges these days (at least in the UW system) would much rather see a lot of extra cirriculars than a 4.0 gpa.

When I visited Case Western this summer, I was told that quality is more important than quantity with regards to extracuriculars. Which is good for me, since I have a couple things that are very important to me, and I don't want to join things like Leo Club just to look good on college applications. :disgust:
 
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Weighted or unweighted?

Amazing how many people are making their judgments without this piece of info.

A good GPA, test scores, AP test scores will get you a look but extracurriculars will put you over the top. I actually got into better schools than our HS valedictorian because of the things I listed. She took reg classes and had a 4.0 while I took AP and only had a 3.4 plus sports, clubs, etc. Focus on becoming a well-rounded person and you will benefit more in the long run.
 
Originally posted by: slsmnaz
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Weighted or unweighted?

Amazing how many people are making their judgments without this piece of info.

A good GPA, test scores, AP test scores will get you a look but extracurriculars will put you over the top. I actually got into better schools than our HS valedictorian because of the things I listed. She took reg classes and had a 4.0 while I took AP and only had a 3.4 plus sports, clubs, etc. Focus on becoming a well-rounded person and you will benefit more in the long run.

Also, it seems like everyone in this thread thinks that everyone wants go to an Ivy League school. There are many good colleges you can get into with anything above a 2.5 (if you have other things going for you). Going to a state college does not mean you are never going to be successful. Just like how going to an Ivy League school does not mean you are going to be a success.
 
Originally posted by: chris7b
sounds like OP is in high school in which case, yeah...you need better than 4.0 to get in anywhere competitive these days...

Like that really matters... if you're that ambitious undergrad doesn't matter worth a crap anyway. Keep up that 3.83 GPA.... go publish some ******... participate in extra-curriculars... and you can still be damn near president of the USA....
 
For the record... My HS GPA was a 2.8... I went to George Mason U.... graduated with a 2.4...

I make 6 figures, and married a doctor. Don't let your grades define you.

Just figure out what you're good at... and go do it... and get better at it.
 
Smart and hard working enough for a 3.83 but a punani thinking you're going to get a pat in the back to further grow your e-weinie. Life ain't that serious my friend.
 
I guess I've been out of high school for a long time because when I went, a 4.0 was the highest you could get. So with a 3.83, you'd be able to get into 99% of the colleges in the country. The only exceptions being the very top ranked schools like MIT, Harvard, Princeton, etc., where they had so many applications that even with a 4.0, your chances of admission depended on a number of other factors, like extracurriculars, SAT's, interviews, etc.
 
I'd be curious to know just what it takes to get into MIT or Cornell nowadays. Anyone know of any non-traditional (i.e. older) students who have successfully applied to a top school?
 

Originally posted by: SoulAssassin
So let me get this right, you're smart enough to get a 3.83 but not smart enough to figure out if it's good? You do fail at life.

Sound like my effing parents. Still remember in grade school when they shat me for getting anything less than a 3.2 (~not really averages, more about assignments, quizes and tests), wouldn't hear the end of it for days. Even if I got an effing 3.83, they'd still bitch about getting higher, work harder, geez, shut the **** up. Now, they see nothing and hear nothing.
 
Originally posted by: Pacemaker
Originally posted by: slsmnaz
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Weighted or unweighted?

Amazing how many people are making their judgments without this piece of info.

A good GPA, test scores, AP test scores will get you a look but extracurriculars will put you over the top. I actually got into better schools than our HS valedictorian because of the things I listed. She took reg classes and had a 4.0 while I took AP and only had a 3.4 plus sports, clubs, etc. Focus on becoming a well-rounded person and you will benefit more in the long run.

Also, it seems like everyone in this thread thinks that everyone wants go to an Ivy League school. There are many good colleges you can get into with anything above a 2.5 (if you have other things going for you). Going to a state college does not mean you are never going to be successful. Just like how going to an Ivy League school does not mean you are going to be a success.

Honestly, it matters, but it depends what kidn of HS you have. I had a SLIGHT advantage over many in terms of SAT II scores and I know that the UC system weights SAT II scores very heavily (back when the old SAT I existed). Because of this, I had a lot of friends who were slightly below me in admissions in that they got into UCLA but not Cal. To this day, I know that because I paid $1500 for essay writing services, I could've sworn my application kicked ass compared to my friends' and that my slight advantage in SAT II scores got me into Berkeley as well as some private schools.

3.83 can be good or bad depending how you look at it. Unweighted, it's great. I had a weighted GPA of 4.35. That put me at rank 55 in my high school. Pretty sad huh? You needed like a 4.65 to be in the top 10.

I know you will hear people talk about how low GPAs can be made up with extracurriculars and a great essay. I know that a poor essay can kill you, and apparently a lot of people don't submit that great personal statements. I had a great essay to begin with and I went over it wiht my HS english teachers and good writer friends who helped me hammer out a pretty good essay. I was proud. I then dumped $1500 for a college prep program and those 4 StanFUrd English majors totally revamped my essay. It's one thing to write well, but it's another thing to hit the points that colleges want to see in order to say "Hey this is someone we want."

Honestly, public schools don't give a fvck about your extracurriculars. We all know the UC system uses a point system where they dump your SAT scores and your GPA in. IF you pass this basic cut, you're in. IF not, then they have to look at your other crap. Bottom line is their "comprehensive review" system is junk. If you're relying on it, it means you're at the borderline. Play it safe. gEt the scores. Get the grades, write the good personal statement. Don't let them have to deliberate over you, and you'll be in.

If you have a competetive HS, top schools aren't going to take you. I can guarantee that the top 60 people in our high school had in general higher SAT scores and higher GPAs than those in ATOT who can claim they got into MIT, Stanfurd, etc, and yet only 2 of us were accepted to Stanfurd. But oh well, Asian high schools get pwned by private schools. But then again that's why we're a top feeder school for the UC system. There's like 53 of us who went to Cal and around 40 who went to UCLA. More at SD and Davis. Sum that up and that's like half of our graduating class already
 
LOL. I graduated high school with like a 2.3 or something and got accept to State University. Granted I nailed the SAT, but still, grades by themselves mean very little unless you're trying to be an overachiever and want to go to a private college so you can graduate with 50K in debt. 🙂
 
Back
Top