werepossum
Elite Member
- Jul 10, 2006
- 29,873
- 463
- 126
Had Lerner printed and filed her emails, they would not be unrecoverable and would presumably have been turned over to Congress as part of its Constitutionally mandated oversight. It's also axiomatic that if all emails for a period are missing, then all official business emails are also missing. Unless you've sunk far enough to claim Lerner spent her days generating tens of thousands of emails about Obama's beautiful eyes, anyway.Go play, child. You are pathetic. I made two specific points, neither of which is in the least debatable or ambiguous. First, the record retention requirements in question cover "official records" specifically, not all email. Second, we have no information yet about what email Lerner did and did not print and file. Therefore, we have no way to determine if she complied with the record retention requirements or not. Those are facts, no matter what Fox told you. That you chose to dispute these facts only reinforces your lack of integrity.
Perhaps I should bump some of your earlier whoppers in this thread -- none of which you've acknowledged or corrected -- to remind everyone what a lying weasel you've become. You know, like this steaming pile of possum excrement:"The Obama administration has claimed that sixty percent of the groups targeted ... were not conservative groups."Tell us lies
Tell us sweet little lies
(Tell us lies, tell us, tell us lies)
![]()
Um, inconvenient facts? Bowfinger did nothing but make some asinine and labored "reasoning" about how this could be okay, as always, conveniently fact free.Lol. As per usual, anyone who tells you inconvenient facts must be lying to you or part of a conspiracy. It couldn't possibly be that you are ignorant and delusional.
Exactly. I had a moment of hope when this first came out and the proggies vanished, foolishly thinking perhaps they had reached the limit of what they were willing to support. Foolish, foolish werepossum. Now we see that the White House can safely claim literally anything, no matter how patently a lie it may be, because their followers are too dishonest and/or too stupid to reject it.Exactly.
Should be obvious this mentality isn't limited to government, for all the differences expressed on this board Werepossum is doing you guys a favor by pointing out the slight of hand that often takes place. Fitting he'd get lambasted! :thumbsup:
Even if you don't believe it's taking place in the IRS scandal (Hint: It is) you will find it in other areas of our lives related to business/law/politics as long as you are aware of it.
Orwell points out it as well as anyone regarding "doublethink" and it's definition.
So not limited to government, but pervase in politics, business and law.
Specificaly regarding using private definitions vs what one knows another would use for the definition of words, in a manner to be deceptive and dishonest, which is Werepossum's point:
The IRS scandal is a perfect example of this fundamental dishonesty regarding the hard drive crash and recovery attempts and the manner in which information has been brought to investigators attention. The IRS is lying, granted they are being somewhat clever about it. Doesn't need to involve anyone outside the IRS which is distraction at this point, but I'd remain wary of anyone who can't see the deception being perpetuated by the IRS here even if they can't adequately explain it (hint: likely political hack).
