Irregularities with the Trump Inaugural Fund

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,187
4,871
136
It's been one year since Trump took office yet his inaugural fund has some issues. This is normally something that is resolved well before now with a full disclosure of how those funds have been disbursed yet Trump is running this one covertly. I would like to know how they were dispersed and what happened to the surplus funds from this account.

 

1sikbITCH

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2001
4,194
574
126
Coming at him from all sides now.

Duetsche Bank just announced that their internal audit identified that Kushner and his business were appearing to launder money through their bank. Mueller subpoenaed this info in December and they are now prepared to meet with him and turn it all over.

http://www.newsweek.com/deutsche-ba...ushners-suspicious-transactions-robert-786011

Looks like Bannon wasn't wrong when he said the organized crime activities would bring down the Trump administration and so far it seems he'll turn out right.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,425
10,019
136
It's not organized crime if the President isn't organized.
You forgot this guy...
4b546c0d68954900825edbf1647ada47.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Homerboy and kstu

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,570
6,712
126
If republicans were smart they would impeach Trump rather than shield that Russian mob planted traitor.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,090
6,345
136
Foolish Trump. He should have a foundation to funnel questionable money and bribes through. That's the difference between an armature and a pro.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,570
6,712
126
But that would mean they were wrong. They can't have that. Conservatives never make a mistake.
What I would do in a situation like that is to tell myself I was and still am right but that circumstances have changed.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,170
18,807
146
What makes this comment funny is all the actual evidence of Trump using his foundation for his own personal benefit countless times.

Bingo! While there is absolutely no valid evidence any of the Clinton Foundation funds were used personally by the Clintons and it had a score in the 90+ percent range, there is an incontrovertible fact that Trump used the vast majority of his foundation funds for himself and it had a score of 5 percent.

But hey! Projection had worked so far right?

The right-wing is Orwellian in their doublespeak. Truly fscking Orwellian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54

skull

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2000
2,209
327
126
I didn't know he had a foundation. Since he had a money laundering service in place, why not use it?

Hes too used to being a scammer in private business, where he could get away without too many questions. Now that hes president everything is getting a spot light and a microscope.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,023
9,475
146
I didn't know he had a foundation. Since he had a money laundering service in place, why not use it?
Because he’s a sleazy corrupt opportunist who will do everything he can to avoid actually being accountable for his own actions? He used his foundations money, other people’s money, to pay off fines and legal settlements for his for profit businesses, buy a giant ass portrait of himself and the list goes on.

You guys ignore all evidence of his blatant criminality while knowing in your gut Clinton must be guilty in the absence of any evidence.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
I didn't know he had a foundation. Since he had a money laundering service in place, why not use it?
Trump’s foundation exists only to solve Trump’s problems with pre-tax dollars and allow the occassional legal bribe. His money laundering takes place overseas. (Assuming it exists.)
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,090
6,345
136
Trump’s foundation exists only to solve Trump’s problems with pre-tax dollars and allow the occassional legal bribe. His money laundering takes place overseas. (Assuming it exists.)
Seems wasteful to have two different money laundering services. Perhaps the overseas people work cheaper?
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,090
6,345
136
Of course you didn't know about his foundation. You didn't expect any of the conservative media you consume to tell you about it, did you?
There are two incorrect assumptions in that statement that render it meaningless. You're improving.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
lol +1. Could still be crime, of course.

Frankly I cannot imagine any fund involving Trump and his cronies that doesn’t have irregularities.

Maybe the greatest team of grifters ever assembled... outside of Russia, anyway...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54