Originally posted by: alkemyst
I don't own either, but I know a lot that do...
Ipod is like taking a puppy to the park.
Others is like taking a frizbee.
If you are looking for a music player they both seem great.
If you are looking for a fashion statement ipod wins.
Originally posted by: Philippine Mango
Hardly a fashion statement, more like two years ago it was. Now that every loser,grody person, hippy has one, it's hardly a fashion statement since you look like the rest. It's a fashion statement when it's either not very common at all but looks really good or it's agian not very common but looks like shiet hence being a "statement" and not really the "must have look"...
Originally posted by: Anubis
Creative makes baby jeebus happy
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: Anubis
Creative makes baby jeebus happy
i'd rather not throw more money at the virtual pc audio monopoly stifling any innovation there is left![]()
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: Anubis
Creative makes baby jeebus happy
i'd rather not throw more money at the virtual pc audio monopoly stifling any innovation there is left![]()
And yet you'd buy an ipod :laugh:
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
Hmmmmmmmm.
read the whole post, i said it gets cleaner, but thats about it.
Its called virtual sound at that point, and no I listen to my Ipod on These.
Yes i use diffrent headphones at work, but for pleasure thats what i use.
I encode at 126 because its smaller, and IMO, Not Needed.
BTW, i dont listen to my ipod at home. my computer is set up directly to the sound system.
I know what you mean, but as a portable audio device, most headphones dont even register the change.
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
Another myth.
As a sound engineer i know a little about sound, and the only thing that makes a diffrence is how you encode the sound when recording it. Sorry, your wrong.
EDIT: Btw, unless you have an ear for it, and around 90% of humans dont, Beyond 126bit encoding is not needed. THough yes there will be a cleaner sound above that, you then must take into account that it takes a good ammount more memory to store.
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
Hmmmmmmmm.
read the whole post, i said it gets cleaner, but thats about it.
Its called virtual sound at that point, and no I listen to my Ipod on These.
Yes i use diffrent headphones at work, but for pleasure thats what i use.
I encode at 126 because its smaller, and IMO, Not Needed.
BTW, i dont listen to my ipod at home. my computer is set up directly to the sound system.
I know what you mean, but as a portable audio device, most headphones dont even register the change.
My $20 sony headphones play the difference between the audio devices. heck, the headphones that came with a creative muvo that I bought can register the difference. please go back to the hell hole from which you came.
Originally posted by: torpid
My $20 sony headphones play the difference between the audio devices. heck, the headphones that came with a creative muvo that I bought can register the difference. please go back to the hell hole from which you came.
Hmm... my experience is that cheaper headphones give false impressions of the quality of sound of various sources. Certain frequencies are accentuated too much and the instruments meld together. Yes, some devices will sound better than others with cheap headphones, but once you get nice headphones and an amp, the picture might be totally different. The nomad jukebox 3 sounded pretty good on some average headphones, better than my karma in some cases. But once I hooked it up to my home theater or some etymotic earphones, the karma outclassed it by far.
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Ipods and minis seems to offer agood balance of form/function/price. Other players excel over the ipod in one area but it ends up falling short in others. A 20 gig player thats cheaper tha nthe ipod will look like ass and be built like a tank (zen touch). smaller players that beat it in form will be way over priced (iriver h10s) . But whatever, personal preferences.
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Ipods and minis seems to offer agood balance of form/function/price. Other players excel over the ipod in one area but it ends up falling short in others. A 20 gig player thats cheaper tha nthe ipod will look like ass and be built like a tank (zen touch). smaller players that beat it in form will be way over priced (iriver h10s) . But whatever, personal preferences.
the iriver h10 is not that far above the ipod mini in cost for the functionality that you get.
but yeah, personal preferences will finally dictate what you get. One of my coworkers got an ipod mini 4GB, then I got my iriver h10 5GB and he is looking to return his ipod to get the iriver. I guess functionality can weigh more, but, iriver isn't as well advertised here in the states, so I can see how ipods sell well. Heck, apparently they were advertising it back in the 80s, anyone got a link to the picture from back then with the girl dancing with an ipod on her hip?
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Ipods and minis seems to offer agood balance of form/function/price. Other players excel over the ipod in one area but it ends up falling short in others. A 20 gig player thats cheaper tha nthe ipod will look like ass and be built like a tank (zen touch). smaller players that beat it in form will be way over priced (iriver h10s) . But whatever, personal preferences.
the iriver h10 is not that far above the ipod mini in cost for the functionality that you get.
but yeah, personal preferences will finally dictate what you get. One of my coworkers got an ipod mini 4GB, then I got my iriver h10 5GB and he is looking to return his ipod to get the iriver. I guess functionality can weigh more, but, iriver isn't as well advertised here in the states, so I can see how ipods sell well. Heck, apparently they were advertising it back in the 80s, anyone got a link to the picture from back then with the girl dancing with an ipod on her hip?