sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,382
- 5,942
- 126
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
It appears to me he's speaking for himself "If" he were an Iraqi.Originally posted by: tommywishbone
... "The fact is that these people could have either been tortured and killed under Saddam or they could have been casualties from the current war. If I was an Iraqi I would choose the latter because at least then I had some hope that life might not continue to suck."...
This must be a joke.... right? You actually pretend to speak for the Iraqis? Their country is burning. Their children die in the street everyday. We rape their people, we burn their towns, we run wild without any measure of decency, but you take the sanctamonious position of determining which death is best for them. Madness. Madness.
And I put it to you sir; the time for intellectual content, the time for debate, was THREE years ago, BEFORE we decided that mass murder & carnage was correct path. Perhaps we have gotten to the point where reason, relevance & intellect are no longer avenues of choice. When your house is on fire and half the family is dead, you don't sit down and review the best options; you scream and run! It's time to run.
And, truthfully, we get more lectures from the left about how terrible it is in Iraq, how the Iraqi people are suffering, what they want from government and life; so the left seems to speak as a proxy for Iraqis quite often. During their diatribes they seem to forget that the Iraqis have spoken themselves already and are glad Saddam is gone, have hope for a better future, and don't want a religious government. But you wouldn't know that by listening to the anti-war crew in the US because they so often neglect to mention those little niggling facts.
Many of them speak everyday by sending young Americans home in body bags and ambulances. It's not a clear cut thing.