Iranian based troops move into Iraq

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
the financial times has posted a story

linky

Iranian-backed Iraqi opposition forces have crossed into northern Iraq from Iran with the aim of securing the frontier in the event of war, according to senior Iranian officials.


The forces, numbering up to 5,000 troops, with some heavy equipment, are nominally under the command of Ayatollah Mohammad Baqir al-Hakim, a prominent Iraqi Shia Muslim opposition leader who has been based in Iran since 1980 and lives in Tehran.

A US State Department official said he was aware of reports that part of Ayatollah Hakim's Badr brigade had crossed into northern Iraq but declined further comment. Analysts close to the administration of President George W. Bush said the US was concerned about the intentions of this new element in an increasingly complicated patchwork of forces in northern Iraq.

you think Saddam will move to stop this incursion of Iraq's boarder?
 

jahawkin

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2000
1,355
0
0
The Turks want to extend their boarder into northern Iraq as well, and have plans to do so if/when US led invasion begins. The whole place could turn into a huge mess....
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: jahawkin
The Turks want to extend their boarder into northern Iraq as well, and have plans to do so if/when US led invasion begins. The whole place could turn into a huge mess....
That's the first I've heard of this. I can't see any support from the international body for Turkey extending its borders into Iraq. I don't see it happening.

 

iwearnosox

Lifer
Oct 26, 2000
16,018
5
0
Originally posted by: jahawkin
The Turks want to extend their boarder into northern Iraq as well, and have plans to do so if/when US led invasion begins. The whole place could turn into a huge mess....

I never could refuse more turkey...
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Could get interesting. Iran could invade, and I doubt Saddam would be allowed to respond. Hmmm...
 

jahawkin

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2000
1,355
0
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: jahawkin
The Turks want to extend their boarder into northern Iraq as well, and have plans to do so if/when US led invasion begins. The whole place could turn into a huge mess....
That's the first I've heard of this. I can't see any support from the international body for Turkey extending its borders into Iraq. I don't see it happening.

Of course it will be done for Turkish "security." I'll try to find the links....
 

DaiShan

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2001
9,617
1
0
Originally posted by: jahawkin
The Turks want to extend their boarder into northern Iraq as well, and have plans to do so if/when US led invasion begins. The whole place could turn into a huge mess....
I recall a quote by Churchill IIRC "the Turks have such a strong appetite, but such poor teeth."
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: jahawkin
The Turks want to extend their boarder into northern Iraq as well, and have plans to do so if/when US led invasion begins. The whole place could turn into a huge mess....
That's the first I've heard of this. I can't see any support from the international body for Turkey extending its borders into Iraq. I don't see it happening.

Of course it will be done for Turkish "security." I'll try to find the links....
I'm sure Turkey would like it but if it happened the world would see the US as leading an attack on a soverign nation not just to secure peace in the world and help that nation's people, but to annex land and seize assets. I don't expect the US or any other nation would be big on this idea at all. It would undermine everything the pro-war nations are currently saying.


 

jahawkin

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2000
1,355
0
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: jahawkin
The Turks want to extend their boarder into northern Iraq as well, and have plans to do so if/when US led invasion begins. The whole place could turn into a huge mess....
That's the first I've heard of this. I can't see any support from the international body for Turkey extending its borders into Iraq. I don't see it happening.

Of course it will be done for Turkish "security." I'll try to find the links....
I'm sure Turkey would like it but if it happened the world would see the US as leading an attack on a soverign nation not just to secure peace in the world and help that nation's people, but to annex land and seize assets. I don't expect the US or any other nation would be big on this idea at all. It would undermine everything the pro-war nations are currently saying.

Here it is:
"Turkey is raising its price for allowing U.S. forces to invade Iraq from its territory. In early negotiations with the United States, Ankara spoke of sending in Turkish troops to set up a ?buffer zone? perhaps 15 miles deep along the Iraqi border. This would prevent a flood of Kurdish refugees from northern Iraq, the Turks said."
Edit: Oops, here's the better quote:
"BUT NOW, NEWSWEEK has learned, Turkey is demanding that it send 60,000 to 80,000 of its own troops into northern Iraq to establish ?strategic positions? across a ?security arc? as much as 140 to 170 miles deep in Iraq."
Edit 2: Read another article stating most Turkish troops in this plan would be under US command, but still 10-15 thousand under Turkish command...
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: jahawkin The Turks want to extend their boarder into northern Iraq as well, and have plans to do so if/when US led invasion begins. The whole place could turn into a huge mess....
That's the first I've heard of this. I can't see any support from the international body for Turkey extending its borders into Iraq. I don't see it happening.

Thought this was common knowlege. Remember that Iraq is not a "natural" country. It was set up by the British after WWI with 3 distinct groups. The goal was to have a country so divided, it would never be a threat. Worked for a while, but Saddam-like leaders managed to keep it together. Once Saddam is gone, look for the Iraqi people to want to split up the country, and realign or be annexed by neighboring countries.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Here it is:
"Turkey is raising its price for allowing U.S. forces to invade Iraq from its territory. In early negotiations with the United States, Ankara spoke of sending in Turkish troops to set up a ?buffer zone? perhaps 15 miles deep along the Iraqi border. This would prevent a flood of Kurdish refugees from northern Iraq, the Turks said."
Hmm, I guess I could see the argument for that. Turkey needs to fug off with that raising its price crap. The US already offered $26B I think to launch attacks from Turkey and now Turkey wants twice that.
"BUT NOW, NEWSWEEK has learned, Turkey is demanding that it send 60,000 to 80,000 of its own troops into northern Iraq to establish ?strategic positions? across a ?security arc? as much as 140 to 170 miles deep in Iraq."
Ah, that's just silly now :Q

 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: jahawkin
The Turks want to extend their boarder into northern Iraq as well, and have plans to do so if/when US led invasion begins. The whole place could turn into a huge mess....
That's the first I've heard of this. I can't see any support from the international body for Turkey extending its borders into Iraq. I don't see it happening.

Of course it will be done for Turkish "security." I'll try to find the links....
I'm sure Turkey would like it but if it happened the world would see the US as leading an attack on a soverign nation not just to secure peace in the world and help that nation's people, but to annex land and seize assets. I don't expect the US or any other nation would be big on this idea at all. It would undermine everything the pro-war nations are currently saying.

Here it is:
"Turkey is raising its price for allowing U.S. forces to invade Iraq from its territory. In early negotiations with the United States, Ankara spoke of sending in Turkish troops to set up a ?buffer zone? perhaps 15 miles deep along the Iraqi border. This would prevent a flood of Kurdish refugees from northern Iraq, the Turks said."
Edit: Oops, here's the better quote:
"BUT NOW, NEWSWEEK has learned, Turkey is demanding that it send 60,000 to 80,000 of its own troops into northern Iraq to establish ?strategic positions? across a ?security arc? as much as 140 to 170 miles deep in Iraq."

From the sounds of it, we are not going to pay them any more.
 

Tripleshot

Elite Member
Jan 29, 2000
7,218
1
0
Iran is invading anything. And there is already negotiated responses to Turkey DEFENDING its border when the war begins from an onslaught of Kurds crosing the border to escape from Saddam.

If an opposition group indeed has crossed into Iraq from Iran, it is probably a welcome thing by the people who inhabit the North. It is in the interest of the indeginous people of Iraq to resolve governship of the country after military action has dealt with the "regime change", which is the sole reason we are going to war in the first place.

After a legitimate democratic and fair government is installed, then Iraq will recieve the things needed to rebuild, and they can barter for that with the oil reserves it has. It is a win win situation for Iraq. Do we really know who is best to rule Iraq after Saddam is gone? No, but you can be sure the people of Iraq are not remotely interested in Tommy Franks running the country.

Discussions about France,Germany,Belgium or Russia holding out for favorable relief for oil contracts or paid of debts is folly. The new goveernment in Iraq will have to deal with any outstanding unfullfilled contractural agreements the Saddam may or may not have made. If you make a deal with a dead man, don't expect to get paid. And don't expect the dead mans family to pay the debt.

You dance with the Devil , you just might get burned. Suck it France/Germany/Belgium :disgust:
 

Whitecloak

Diamond Member
May 4, 2001
6,074
2
0
Originally posted by: Tripleshot


You dance with the Devil , you just might get burned. Suck it France/Germany/Belgium :disgust:

the same can be said for the support given to osama and the taliban by the US during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Everything is so simple and easy.
Kurds are helping us fight Saddam, their goal is to establish a Kurdish state. If Saddam is defeated, they sure are going to try to do so. I doubt they will want to remain part of Iraq. If Iraq is weakened, they will secede. Turkey will not allow it, because it will eventually lead to Turkish part of Kurdistan joining the one on Iraqi side, and another civil war with the Kurds for Turkey. Turkey is part of NATO, so there is a chance we will be fighting the Kurds who are now helping us against Saddam. So instead of criticizing Saddam for opressing the Kurds, we are going to be in the unenviable position of either having to opress them or helping Turkey opress them. There are geopolitical issues here that I don't think are given sufficient consideration by Bush, who can't think past 2004.
 

coolVariable

Diamond Member
May 18, 2001
3,724
0
76
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Everything is so simple and easy.
Kurds are helping us fight Saddam, their goal is to establish a Kurdish state. If Saddam is defeated, they sure are going to try to do so. I doubt they will want to remain part of Iraq. If Iraq is weakened, they will secede. Turkey will not allow it, because it will eventually lead to Turkish part of Kurdistan joining the one on Iraqi side, and another civil war with the Kurds for Turkey. Turkey is part of NATO, so there is a chance we will be fighting the Kurds who are now helping us against Saddam. So instead of criticizing Saddam for opressing the Kurds, we are going to be in the unenviable position of either having to opress them or helping Turkey opress them. There are geopolitical issues here that I don't think are given sufficient consideration by Bush, who can't think past 2004.


I agree.
 

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Everything is so simple and easy.
Kurds are helping us fight Saddam, their goal is to establish a Kurdish state. If Saddam is defeated, they sure are going to try to do so. I doubt they will want to remain part of Iraq. If Iraq is weakened, they will secede. Turkey will not allow it, because it will eventually lead to Turkish part of Kurdistan joining the one on Iraqi side, and another civil war with the Kurds for Turkey. Turkey is part of NATO, so there is a chance we will be fighting the Kurds who are now helping us against Saddam. So instead of criticizing Saddam for opressing the Kurds, we are going to be in the unenviable position of either having to opress them or helping Turkey opress them. There are geopolitical issues here that I don't think are given sufficient consideration by Bush, who can't think past 2004.

Kurdistan also extends into Iran, but it is doubtful that they will get anywhere with Turkey or Iran, i.e. they have no friends. Look, this is a common thread throughout the area. The country of Macedonia looks to the province of "Macedonia" in Greece as theirs. The Iranians see Azerbaijan as theirs since they have a province by the same name, and actually held that area of the old borders of Persia. Kurds may help, but it'll only give them a voice, not a new country.
 

Skyclad1uhm1

Lifer
Aug 10, 2001
11,383
87
91
The Turks don't want the Kurds to cross the border, that's why they are tightening security.

A Dutch newssite reports that the Iranians crossing the border are mostly exiled members of the Iraqi opposition, that they were stationed near the southern border, but most likely crossed a bit more to the north somewhere in December.
 

Bluga

Banned
Nov 28, 2000
4,315
0
0
Originally posted by: Tripleshot
Iran is invading anything. And there is already negotiated responses to Turkey DEFENDING its border when the war begins from an onslaught of Kurds crosing the border to escape from Saddam.

If an opposition group indeed has crossed into Iraq from Iran, it is probably a welcome thing by the people who inhabit the North. It is in the interest of the indeginous people of Iraq to resolve governship of the country after military action has dealt with the "regime change", which is the sole reason we are going to war in the first place.

After a legitimate democratic and fair government is installed, then Iraq will recieve the things needed to rebuild, and they can barter for that with the oil reserves it has. It is a win win situation for Iraq. Do we really know who is best to rule Iraq after Saddam is gone? No, but you can be sure the people of Iraq are not remotely interested in Tommy Franks running the country.

Discussions about France,Germany,Belgium or Russia holding out for favorable relief for oil contracts or paid of debts is folly. The new goveernment in Iraq will have to deal with any outstanding unfullfilled contractural agreements the Saddam may or may not have made. If you make a deal with a dead man, don't expect to get paid. And don't expect the dead mans family to pay the debt.

You dance with the Devil , you just might get burned. Suck it France/Germany/Belgium :disgust:

Suck it USA, the world doesn't revolve around you.

I hope the world will stand up aganist the biggest threat.

 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: whitecloak
Originally posted by: Tripleshot


You dance with the Devil , you just might get burned. Suck it France/Germany/Belgium :disgust:

the same can be said for the support given to osama and the taliban by the US during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

There was no Taliban until 1995. OBL was a minor player in that war. Study before posting.
 

Mookow

Lifer
Apr 24, 2001
10,162
0
0
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: whitecloak
Originally posted by: Tripleshot


You dance with the Devil , you just might get burned. Suck it France/Germany/Belgium :disgust:

the same can be said for the support given to osama and the taliban by the US during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

There was no Taliban until 1995. OBL was a minor player in that war. Study before posting.

Oh come on! Quit telling him to study and learn. I much prefer getting a good laugh out of the idiots on ATOT ;)
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
eh, hope the iranians and iraqi's start fighting again and annihilate each other.