Iran ready to share nuclear know-how with other Islamic countries!!!

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: HardWarrior

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
(more of the same)

What a snot-nosed, thread-crapping punk you are, son. You'd be a sad case, if I cared. I urge you to burn your computer and never darken this place again, okay?

LOL - it's very amazing how the phrase 'You must live in a very naive world. ' threw you into a rage and made you unable to reply to any portion of my post. Then when I confront you with the truth and exposed your own extremism, you become angry again.

Again, I desperately urge you to seek help!

 

[oslama]

Originally posted by: Nocturnal
This just made my eyes go :Q

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/iran_nuclear...0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--

good for them

 

[HardWarrior]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: HardWarrior

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
(more of the same)

What a snot-nosed, thread-crapping punk you are, son. You'd be a sad case, if I cared. I urge you to burn your computer and never darken this place again, okay?

LOL - it's very amazing how the phrase 'You must live in a very naive world. ' threw you into a rage and made you unable to reply to any portion of my post. Then when I confront you with the truth and exposed your own extremism, you become angry again.

Again, I desperately urge you to seek help!

You're delusional AND stupid, son. That's no way to negotiate life. I didn't reply on topic because your ?post? was laced with unnecessary and unprovoked invective. Your ?musings? have so far amounted to nothing more than self-serving pap. Do you go for insults FIRST in real life? I think not, e-bombasts and post-retards are VERY quiet away from their keyboards, yes? This discussion was steaming right along until your post-crazy ass appeared.

What you're doing now, out of some misplaced need for attention I think, is claiming victory when you can't even engage in a cordial conversation without slapping yourself on the back and spewing nonsense. "You're an extremist!!! You're an extremist!!! You're an extremist, and I've proven it too!!! I urge you to do this!!! I urge you to do that!!! (giggle)" How useless, pedestrian and childishly repetitive.

Moreover, don't pretend that any of this is fun for you, simpleton. You're probably sucking lemons and stabbing yourself with a fork right now.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: HardWarrior
You're delusional AND stupid, son. That's no way to negotiate life. I didn't reply on topic because your ?post? was laced with unnecessary and unprovoked invective. Your ?musings? have so far amounted to nothing more than self-serving pap. Do you go for insults FIRST in real life? I think not, e-bombasts and post-retards are VERY quiet away from their keyboards, yes? This discussion was steaming right along until your post-crazy ass appeared.

Child, you freaked out upon seeing 'you must live in a naive world' or a similar statement - after you start talking about my 'misgivings' and how it relates to the government's failures. Both of our statemetns were really hardly an insult if they can even be considered an insult! And then when you explode in an extremist rant, I point out yet another mistake and you go off on another childish tirade. Boy, if you get so insulted from nothing and freak out when someone corrects you when you were blatantly wrong, then you're not going to travel far in life. High school will certainly be a challenge for you if you do not learn to correct your ways.

What you're doing now, out of some misplaced need for attention I think, is claiming victory when you can't even engage in a cordial conversation without slapping yourself on the back and spewing nonsense. "You're an extremist!!! You're an extremist!!! You're an extremist, and I've proven it too!!! I urge you to do this!!! I urge you to do that!!! (giggle)" How useless, pedestrian and childishly repetitive.

:laugh: - If an extremist label disturbs you so, then I would suggest that you refrain from such extremist idiocy. Again you cry and vent when someone points out how corrupted you have become! Son, I beg you, there is still time for us to fix your ailment!

The sad thing is that I actually addressed your points, but you simply replied with feces and likely ran to your parents. Then I addressed how your post (filled with conspiracy theories and classic extremist behavior) exposed your true extremist nature. So, please, spare me the revisionist history.

Moreover, don't pretend that any of this is fun for you, simpleton. You're probably sucking lemons and stabbing yourself with a fork right now.

Is that what kids do these days? :laugh:

 

[HardWarrior]

Again, "I freaked you out!!!" "You're an extremist!!!" "You're naive!!!" As if chanting something, over and over, makes it so. I haven't seen this sort of witless prattle since Cad's last post. But by all means, keep it coming, maybe you'll pop an aneurism or get banned.

 

[tooltime]

yikes, where is this going

 

[HardWarrior]

Originally posted by: tooltime
yikes, where is this going

Nowhere, which seems to be just what this moron wanted. Look back through the thread, things were fairly civil, and informative, until he showed up.

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: kermalou
nice, let them share, another reason for us to nuke the hell out of the middle east (excpet for Israel of course)

SO the cliffnotes are :

We can have Nukes -----> America Fck Yaa

Muslims are not supposed to be threatend by that , and not be threatend by the fact that Israel has a huge stockpile of nuclear warheads that no body from the UN asks them about, Mhmm

WTF do we have the righ to own Nuclear warheads and others can't ? We are the only nation that have used a nuclear bomb so far you ignorant Zionist " except for israel " my ass Israel should be erased for their crimes against humanity, Invading a country that never have hurt them. and restarting a conflict that was over a thousand years ago.

For every zionist out there like this dude if you want Israel to be protected then stop causing the deaths of young americans on the battlefronts let them come back home, and you go to the frontlines with your rich media controlling zionist buddys and go defend Israel. otherwise STFU !!!!!

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: HardWarrior
Again, "I freaked you out!!!" "You're an extremist!!!" "You're naive!!!" As if chanting something, over and over, makes it so. I haven't seen this sort of witless prattle since Cad's last post. But by all means, keep it coming, maybe you'll pop an aneurism or get banned.

Look back at the history of this thread. I made a post, you commented upon it, I then commented on the entirety of your post. You prattle on about how my 'misgivings' somehow validate the government's failings and I ask you to clarify. In my response, I say that your remarks are indicative of you living in a naive state. You then proceed to ignore my entire post, which point by point addresses your post, and go off on a childish and insult filled tirade from a hardly insulting point. Child, stop with the revisionist history.

 

[HardWarrior]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: HardWarrior
That simply is not true. There is no sovereign "right" to interfere in the internal workings of another nation. That we constantly attempt to doesn't make it right, or lawful.

It's not 'illegal' or necessarily wrong either.

If you don't want other countries doing the same to you it is. In addition, the UN charter, which we signed, is very specific about meddling, and that includes unprovoked attacks. The UN charter is the closest thing there is to international "law." Here's a perfect example of what I meant by "might makes right" being the unspoken basis for what the US does. We've demanded that Syria remove itself from all issues Lebanon, including the recent election. We said this while there's a massive US military force right next-door, trying to control every aspect of Iraqi life, with devastating results. Don't you see this as at least a little hypocritical? The Arab press did, and rightfully so.

(Notice no insults, grand standing or finger pointing? If you disagree then fine, but I?m not crazy or "extreme" because we don?t see the situation the same way.)

 

[mOeeOm]

(Notice no insults, grand standing or finger pointing? If you disagree then fine, but I?m not crazy or "extreme" because we don?t see the situation the same way.)

I've tried that approach...lying and name-calling is his game -_-

 

[HardWarrior]

Originally posted by: mOeeOm

(Notice no insults, grand standing or finger pointing? If you disagree then fine, but I?m not crazy or "extreme" because we don?t see the situation the same way.)

I've tried that approach...lying and name-calling is his game -_-

We'll see, huh?

 

[raildogg]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: kermalou
nice, let them share, another reason for us to nuke the hell out of the middle east (excpet for Israel of course)

SO the cliffnotes are :

We can have Nukes -----> America Fck Yaa

Muslims are not supposed to be threatend by that , and not be threatend by the fact that Israel has a huge stockpile of nuclear warheads that no body from the UN asks them about, Mhmm

WTF do we have the righ to own Nuclear warheads and others can't ? We are the only nation that have used a nuclear bomb so far you ignorant Zionist " except for israel " my ass Israel should be erased for their crimes against humanity, Invading a country that never have hurt them. and restarting a conflict that was over a thousand years ago.

For every zionist out there like this dude if you want Israel to be protected then stop causing the deaths of young americans on the battlefronts let them come back home, and you go to the frontlines with your rich media controlling zionist buddys and go defend Israel. otherwise STFU !!!!!

Easy there, Goostepper!

yes, certain countries should never be allowed to have nukes. We failed in the 90s to control N. Korea and now they are making 5 nukes a year. at least 5.

responsible nations with stable leadership, that show that they can control the nuclear weapons and demonstrate that they really do need them can have them. Iran wants nukes so it can blackmail America and other countries. do you not realize that the Arab countries will not sit still if Iran gets nukes? Egypt will get them. so will Saudi Arabia.

then there will be nukes all over the middle east in the hands of muslim extremists! if one gets stolen, you are talking about a 9/11 times a 100. if not higher. that is unacceptable. America comes first.

What about the Arab countries that attacked Israel and then got their asses handed to them? Israel is a tiny sliver of land. I want Jews to have a homeland. they've suffered enough at the hands of Europeans for many years, and now they're suffering at the hands of Arabs. they need some sort of protection.

and yes, I support Israel and wish we could give Israel all the weapons that it wants.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: HardWarrior
If you don't want other countries doing the same to you it is.

Ideally, the government probably doesn't want foreign interference, but it is a natural action in the real world. In addition, the makeup of the government and certain circumstances change these conditions.

In addition, the UN charter, which we signed, is very specific about meddling, and that includes unprovoked attacks. The UN charter is the closest thing there is to international "law." Here's a perfect example of what I meant by "might makes right" being the unspoken basis for what the US does. We've demanded that Syria remove itself from all issues Lebanon, including the recent election.

But the UN charter and 'law' is not exactly that specific and can be interpreted like any other 'law'.

We said this while there's a massive US military force right next-door, trying to control every aspect of Iraqi life, with devastating results. Don't you see this as at least a little hypocritical? The Arab press did, and rightfully so.

It may very well be hypocritical, but the circumstances are completely different and makes any comparison illogical, IMO.

(Notice no insults, grand standing or finger pointing? If you disagree then fine, but I?m not crazy or "extreme" because we don?t see the situation the same way.)

I've never said that you were crazy or extreme because we don't see the situation the same way.

 

[HardWarrior]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Ideally, the government probably doesn't want foreign interference, but it is a natural action in the real world. In addition, the makeup of the government and certain circumstances change these conditions.

In no way is this sort of behavior "natural." Nothing in our constitution grants the federal government the power to interfere in the affairs of other nations. That it does so is a testimonial to how far out of control we've allowed it to become. Yes, governments change, and well they should, but what right do we have muck around with other nations like chess peices when we can't even keep our own house in order.

But the UN charter and 'law' is not exactly that specific and can be interpreted like any other 'law'.

Can I assume that you feel the say way about the constitution?

It may very well be hypocritical, but the circumstances are completely different and makes any comparison illogical, IMO.

How are they different, and what makes the analogy "illogical?"

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: HardWarrior
In no way is this sort of behavior "natural." Nothing in our constitution grants the federal government the power to interfere in the affairs of other nations. That it does so is a testimonial to how far out of control we've allowed it to become. Yes, governments change, and well they should, but what right do we have muck around with other nations like chess peices when we can't even keep our own house in order.

I would say that it is 'natural' in the real world and under real interactions between real countries. In addition, the makeup of the government and the condition that sparks the interference can be an acceptable reason, IMO.

Can I assume that you feel the say way about the constitution?

I was under the assumption that it was already like that. Law is not straight-forward. It can always be argued and a case can always be presented.

How are they different, and what makes the analogy "illogical?"

Because Iraq is under chaos and if the US troops left, it would devolve even further. The situation is not anywhere near the same as Syria. In addition, I don't see how the US is really controlling 'every aspect of Iraqi life', but even then I would consider these extraordinary circumstances.

 

[HardWarrior]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
I would say that it is 'natural' in the real world and under real interactions between real countries. In addition, the makeup of the government and the condition that sparks the interference can be an acceptable reason, IMO.

There was nothing about Irag that warranted American intervention. The results of which speak for themselves. You seem to want to abstract what actually happens, while still clinging to the idea that said abstraction is instead reality. Can we speak specifically? Based on what you SEE and know of, please tell me where our intervention in Iraq has helped us or the Iraqi people in any tangible way. No high-sounding principles, no abstractions.

I was under the assumption that it was already like that. Law is not straight-forward. It can always be argued and a case can always be presented.

Actually that isn't quite true. Are you aware of the idea that the constitution is "the law of the land?" It can't be easily changed, but it can be more easily interpreted. Those interpretations, statutes, are elastic in nature, but they are tied to the constitution in that they can't turn it off. Most of what the fed (state and local governments are guilty of this as well) does is beyond what was defined as it being able to do. By definition, in a land of laws not men, this means the fed is acting in a lawless, illegal manner in fully 90% of its actions. This is a fact, whether you personally agree with those unlawful actions (nation building and endless, fruitless, brutal, expensive interventions) or not.

Because Iraq is under chaos and if the US troops left, it would devolve even further.

Iraq is in a bad way BECAUSE of 14+ years of American intervention. Iraq was a prosporous, progressive and wealthy country before we interfered, at least compared to its neighbors. You are aware that they, meaning the American installed and protected government, has asked us to depart as quickly as possible? How does this fact affect your thoughts on this matter?

The situation is not anywhere near the same as Syria.

No, the situation in Iraq is much worse than what existed in Syria-occupied Lebanon, as indicated factually by the death-toll and strife in Iraq.

In addition, I don't see how the US is really controlling 'every aspect of Iraqi life', but even then I would consider these extraordinary circumstances.

Yet it's true. Everything from oil production to laws to the penal system to commerce to the availability of food-water-electricity are controlled by the US. This is a fact RM, and the American people would be FURIOUS if forced to live under these conditions regardless of the occupier's stated motives, just like the Iraqi people are furious. No, these aren't "extraordinary circumstances", they're the exact same circumstances, more or less, that occupied people have had to deal with for centuries. Just slapping a velvet propaganda glove on an iron fist doesn't decrease the injury that that fist can impart. Again, what I'm saying here is FACT, no abstractions.

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: raildogg

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: kermalou
nice, let them share, another reason for us to nuke the hell out of the middle east (excpet for Israel of course)

SO the cliffnotes are :

We can have Nukes -----> America Fck Yaa

Muslims are not supposed to be threatend by that , and not be threatend by the fact that Israel has a huge stockpile of nuclear warheads that no body from the UN asks them about, Mhmm

WTF do we have the righ to own Nuclear warheads and others can't ? We are the only nation that have used a nuclear bomb so far you ignorant Zionist " except for israel " my ass Israel should be erased for their crimes against humanity, Invading a country that never have hurt them. and restarting a conflict that was over a thousand years ago.

For every zionist out there like this dude if you want Israel to be protected then stop causing the deaths of young americans on the battlefronts let them come back home, and you go to the frontlines with your rich media controlling zionist buddys and go defend Israel. otherwise STFU !!!!!

Easy there, Goostepper!

yes, certain countries should never be allowed to have nukes. We failed in the 90s to control N. Korea and now they are making 5 nukes a year. at least 5.

responsible nations with stable leadership, that show that they can control the nuclear weapons and demonstrate that they really do need them can have them. Iran wants nukes so it can blackmail America and other countries. do you not realize that the Arab countries will not sit still if Iran gets nukes? Egypt will get them. so will Saudi Arabia.

then there will be nukes all over the middle east in the hands of muslim extremists! if one gets stolen, you are talking about a 9/11 times a 100. if not higher. that is unacceptable. America comes first.

What about the Arab countries that attacked Israel and then got their asses handed to them? Israel is a tiny sliver of land. I want Jews to have a homeland. they've suffered enough at the hands of Europeans for many years, and now they're suffering at the hands of Arabs. they need some sort of protection.

and yes, I support Israel and wish we could give Israel all the weapons that it wants.

Where do you get your information from ? The jews came to Palestine under British protection
they killed innocent Arabs ( Christians and Muslims alike) and they destroyed homes to make space for themselves, how can they do such a thing and call them selves upressed !!!!
If I were a Palestenian then I would do whatever it takes inorder to kick them out of my land, that they kicked me out of ( An eye for an eye). And the ones that kill my ppl I would kill them (An eye for an eye)

And concerning the Arab countries, that as you claim stormed Israel because they are a buch of jew-haters, they have seen what the jews where trying to do in Palestine they have the ambitions of taking over the entire area ( and FIY the israeli kenest has a sign that says : " Your land Israel , from the Nile to the ophrite" Got the hint ? ) they saw the masscares that jews were behind, how do you expect them to react when they see their Christian & Muslim brothers being slautered by the jews ?

Did israel win the battle ? Yes they did , if you have the allies supplying you with the latest weapons and assistance, I don't find any reason why not to win while those Arabs are using weapons from the days of the Othoman empire.

So if Arabs aren't allowed to use nuclear weapons because if some terrorists laid there hand on it they will use them against israel or even us. Well why not speculate the same for israel, what if some jewish extremists laid their hands on some Nukes ?

And for God's sake if the jews where so upressed in Europe why between among all the empty spots in the world at that time they had to pick a place where they KNOW they will have conflicts in with the original residents due to relegious issues between both sides. If Europeans cared so much about the jews why haven't they given them thier own country in Europe, that's complete hypocrisy.

And BTW all of the current problems and past problems my country faces today are because of ppl like you, if it hadn't for you ppl 9/11 wouldn't have happened, and the Arabs wouldn't have been hostile to us , who knows maybe we would have had excellent relations, I don't see the Arabs right now having prblems with any country that didn't harm them. If you want to call me "Anti-Semetic" then I am honored to here that, because ATM Anti " Anti-Semetisim" have become more dangerous then "Anti-Semetisim" itself, it made us turn a blind eye to the zionists everytime they threw the word around and now look what level we have reached. Thanx to ppl like you.

 

[raildogg]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: raildogg

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: kermalou
nice, let them share, another reason for us to nuke the hell out of the middle east (excpet for Israel of course)

SO the cliffnotes are :

We can have Nukes -----> America Fck Yaa

Muslims are not supposed to be threatend by that , and not be threatend by the fact that Israel has a huge stockpile of nuclear warheads that no body from the UN asks them about, Mhmm

WTF do we have the righ to own Nuclear warheads and others can't ? We are the only nation that have used a nuclear bomb so far you ignorant Zionist " except for israel " my ass Israel should be erased for their crimes against humanity, Invading a country that never have hurt them. and restarting a conflict that was over a thousand years ago.

For every zionist out there like this dude if you want Israel to be protected then stop causing the deaths of young americans on the battlefronts let them come back home, and you go to the frontlines with your rich media controlling zionist buddys and go defend Israel. otherwise STFU !!!!!

Easy there, Goostepper!

yes, certain countries should never be allowed to have nukes. We failed in the 90s to control N. Korea and now they are making 5 nukes a year. at least 5.

responsible nations with stable leadership, that show that they can control the nuclear weapons and demonstrate that they really do need them can have them. Iran wants nukes so it can blackmail America and other countries. do you not realize that the Arab countries will not sit still if Iran gets nukes? Egypt will get them. so will Saudi Arabia.

then there will be nukes all over the middle east in the hands of muslim extremists! if one gets stolen, you are talking about a 9/11 times a 100. if not higher. that is unacceptable. America comes first.

What about the Arab countries that attacked Israel and then got their asses handed to them? Israel is a tiny sliver of land. I want Jews to have a homeland. they've suffered enough at the hands of Europeans for many years, and now they're suffering at the hands of Arabs. they need some sort of protection.

and yes, I support Israel and wish we could give Israel all the weapons that it wants.

Where do you get your information from ? The jews came to Palestine under British protection
they killed innocent Arabs ( Christians and Muslims alike) and they destroyed homes to make space for themselves, how can they do such a thing and call them selves upressed !!!!
If I were a Palestenian then I would do whatever it takes inorder to kick them out of my land, that they kicked me out of ( An eye for an eye). And the ones that kill my ppl I would kill them (An eye for an eye)

And concerning the Arab countries, that as you claim stormed Israel because they are a buch of jew-haters, they have seen what the jews where trying to do in Palestine they have the ambitions of taking over the entire area ( and FIY the israeli kenest has a sign that says : " Your land Israel , from the Nile to the ophrite" Got the hint ? ) they saw the masscares that jews were behind, how do you expect them to react when they see their Christian & Muslim brothers being slautered by the jews ?

Did israel win the battle ? Yes they did , if you have the allies supplying you with the latest weapons and assistance, I don't find any reason why not to win while those Arabs are using weapons from the days of the Othoman empire.

So if Arabs aren't allowed to use nuclear weapons because if some terrorists laid there hand on it they will use them against israel or even us. Well why not speculate the same for israel, what if some jewish extremists laid their hands on some Nukes ?

And for God's sake if the jews where so upressed in Europe why between among all the empty spots in the world at that time they had to pick a place where they KNOW they will have conflicts in with the original residents due to relegious issues between both sides. If Europeans cared so much about the jews why haven't they given them there own country in Europe, that's complete HYPOCRICY.

And BTW all of the current problems and past problems my country faces today are because of ppl like you, if it hadn't for you ppl 9/11 wouldn't have happened, and the Arabs wouldn't have been hostile to us , who knows maybe we would have had excellent relations, I don't see the Arabs right now having prblems with any country that didn't harm them. If you want to call me "Anti-Semetic" then I am honored to here that, because ATM Anti " Anti-Semetisim" have become more dangerous then "Anti-Semetisim" itself, it made us turn a blind eye to the zionists everytime they threw the word around and now look what level we have reached. Thanx to ppl like you.

you naive person you

Jews have had a presence in that area for a while, thats the most logical places for a Jewish state.

oh right! so now the 3,000 dead Americans are at fault that 19 Arabs killed them? we are at fault that they attacked us? we are at fault because Islam has a huge extreme element to it? you sound just like that pony tailed professor at the Colorado university. tell that to the families of the 3,000 dead Americans that it is their fault that they are dead.

you are just another Arab apologist. nothing to see here. there is a reason why extreme elements from Islam are at war with the rest of the world and America was part of that!

I support Israel and I hope they succeed. if that pisses you off, tough luck. im glad Democrats and Republicans alike support Israel.

Hitler would be proud of you. you are blaming all the current problems on those Jews eh. if it hadn't been for those Jews the world would be a much better place, huh? well, thanks to this country, that is not the case. tell me, what do the Jews have to do with Chechnya? Kashmir? Phillipines? Indonesia? the Balkans? many parts of Africa? Thailand? Afghanistan? Central Asia? NOTHING. those areas are dealing with muslim extremism that is not connected in any way to Israel.

so put away that blind hatred

 

[MegaWorks]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: raildogg

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: kermalou
nice, let them share, another reason for us to nuke the hell out of the middle east (excpet for Israel of course)

SO the cliffnotes are :

We can have Nukes -----> America Fck Yaa

Muslims are not supposed to be threatend by that , and not be threatend by the fact that Israel has a huge stockpile of nuclear warheads that no body from the UN asks them about, Mhmm

WTF do we have the righ to own Nuclear warheads and others can't ? We are the only nation that have used a nuclear bomb so far you ignorant Zionist " except for israel " my ass Israel should be erased for their crimes against humanity, Invading a country that never have hurt them. and restarting a conflict that was over a thousand years ago.

For every zionist out there like this dude if you want Israel to be protected then stop causing the deaths of young americans on the battlefronts let them come back home, and you go to the frontlines with your rich media controlling zionist buddys and go defend Israel. otherwise STFU !!!!!

Easy there, Goostepper!

yes, certain countries should never be allowed to have nukes. We failed in the 90s to control N. Korea and now they are making 5 nukes a year. at least 5.

responsible nations with stable leadership, that show that they can control the nuclear weapons and demonstrate that they really do need them can have them. Iran wants nukes so it can blackmail America and other countries. do you not realize that the Arab countries will not sit still if Iran gets nukes? Egypt will get them. so will Saudi Arabia.

then there will be nukes all over the middle east in the hands of muslim extremists! if one gets stolen, you are talking about a 9/11 times a 100. if not higher. that is unacceptable. America comes first.

What about the Arab countries that attacked Israel and then got their asses handed to them? Israel is a tiny sliver of land. I want Jews to have a homeland. they've suffered enough at the hands of Europeans for many years, and now they're suffering at the hands of Arabs. they need some sort of protection.

and yes, I support Israel and wish we could give Israel all the weapons that it wants.

Where do you get your information from ? The jews came to Palestine under British protection
they killed innocent Arabs ( Christians and Muslims alike) and they destroyed homes to make space for themselves, how can they do such a thing and call them selves upressed !!!!
If I were a Palestenian then I would do whatever it takes inorder to kick them out of my land, that they kicked me out of ( An eye for an eye). And the ones that kill my ppl I would kill them (An eye for an eye)

And concerning the Arab countries, that as you claim stormed Israel because they are a buch of jew-haters, they have seen what the jews where trying to do in Palestine they have the ambitions of taking over the entire area ( and FIY the israeli kenest has a sign that says : " Your land Israel , from the Nile to the ophrite" Got the hint ? ) they saw the masscares that jews were behind, how do you expect them to react when they see their Christian & Muslim brothers being slautered by the jews ?

Did israel win the battle ? Yes they did , if you have the allies supplying you with the latest weapons and assistance, I don't find any reason why not to win while those Arabs are using weapons from the days of the Othoman empire.

So if Arabs aren't allowed to use nuclear weapons because if some terrorists laid there hand on it they will use them against israel or even us. Well why not speculate the same for israel, what if some jewish extremists laid their hands on some Nukes ?

And for God's sake if the jews where so upressed in Europe why between among all the empty spots in the world at that time they had to pick a place where they KNOW they will have conflicts in with the original residents due to relegious issues between both sides. If Europeans cared so much about the jews why haven't they given them thier own country in Europe, that's complete hypocrisy.

And BTW all of the current problems and past problems my country faces today are because of ppl like you, if it hadn't for you ppl 9/11 wouldn't have happened, and the Arabs wouldn't have been hostile to us , who knows maybe we would have had excellent relations, I don't see the Arabs right now having prblems with any country that didn't harm them. If you want to call me "Anti-Semetic" then I am honored to here that, because ATM Anti " Anti-Semetisim" have become more dangerous then "Anti-Semetisim" itself, it made us turn a blind eye to the zionists everytime they threw the word around and now look what level we have reached. Thanx to ppl like you.

raildogg is a nice guy, he's just lost. Sorry raildogg

 

[raildogg]

Originally posted by: MegaWorks

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: raildogg

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: kermalou
nice, let them share, another reason for us to nuke the hell out of the middle east (excpet for Israel of course)

SO the cliffnotes are :

We can have Nukes -----> America Fck Yaa

Muslims are not supposed to be threatend by that , and not be threatend by the fact that Israel has a huge stockpile of nuclear warheads that no body from the UN asks them about, Mhmm

WTF do we have the righ to own Nuclear warheads and others can't ? We are the only nation that have used a nuclear bomb so far you ignorant Zionist " except for israel " my ass Israel should be erased for their crimes against humanity, Invading a country that never have hurt them. and restarting a conflict that was over a thousand years ago.

For every zionist out there like this dude if you want Israel to be protected then stop causing the deaths of young americans on the battlefronts let them come back home, and you go to the frontlines with your rich media controlling zionist buddys and go defend Israel. otherwise STFU !!!!!

Easy there, Goostepper!

yes, certain countries should never be allowed to have nukes. We failed in the 90s to control N. Korea and now they are making 5 nukes a year. at least 5.

responsible nations with stable leadership, that show that they can control the nuclear weapons and demonstrate that they really do need them can have them. Iran wants nukes so it can blackmail America and other countries. do you not realize that the Arab countries will not sit still if Iran gets nukes? Egypt will get them. so will Saudi Arabia.

then there will be nukes all over the middle east in the hands of muslim extremists! if one gets stolen, you are talking about a 9/11 times a 100. if not higher. that is unacceptable. America comes first.

What about the Arab countries that attacked Israel and then got their asses handed to them? Israel is a tiny sliver of land. I want Jews to have a homeland. they've suffered enough at the hands of Europeans for many years, and now they're suffering at the hands of Arabs. they need some sort of protection.

and yes, I support Israel and wish we could give Israel all the weapons that it wants.

Where do you get your information from ? The jews came to Palestine under British protection
they killed innocent Arabs ( Christians and Muslims alike) and they destroyed homes to make space for themselves, how can they do such a thing and call them selves upressed !!!!
If I were a Palestenian then I would do whatever it takes inorder to kick them out of my land, that they kicked me out of ( An eye for an eye). And the ones that kill my ppl I would kill them (An eye for an eye)

And concerning the Arab countries, that as you claim stormed Israel because they are a buch of jew-haters, they have seen what the jews where trying to do in Palestine they have the ambitions of taking over the entire area ( and FIY the israeli kenest has a sign that says : " Your land Israel , from the Nile to the ophrite" Got the hint ? ) they saw the masscares that jews were behind, how do you expect them to react when they see their Christian & Muslim brothers being slautered by the jews ?

Did israel win the battle ? Yes they did , if you have the allies supplying you with the latest weapons and assistance, I don't find any reason why not to win while those Arabs are using weapons from the days of the Othoman empire.

So if Arabs aren't allowed to use nuclear weapons because if some terrorists laid there hand on it they will use them against israel or even us. Well why not speculate the same for israel, what if some jewish extremists laid their hands on some Nukes ?

And for God's sake if the jews where so upressed in Europe why between among all the empty spots in the world at that time they had to pick a place where they KNOW they will have conflicts in with the original residents due to relegious issues between both sides. If Europeans cared so much about the jews why haven't they given them thier own country in Europe, that's complete hypocrisy.

And BTW all of the current problems and past problems my country faces today are because of ppl like you, if it hadn't for you ppl 9/11 wouldn't have happened, and the Arabs wouldn't have been hostile to us , who knows maybe we would have had excellent relations, I don't see the Arabs right now having prblems with any country that didn't harm them. If you want to call me "Anti-Semetic" then I am honored to here that, because ATM Anti " Anti-Semetisim" have become more dangerous then "Anti-Semetisim" itself, it made us turn a blind eye to the zionists everytime they threw the word around and now look what level we have reached. Thanx to ppl like you.

raildogg is a nice guy, he's just lost. Sorry raildogg

my only hope is for you to lead me through!

 

[MegaWorks]

Originally posted by: raildogg

Originally posted by: MegaWorks

raildogg is a nice guy, he's just lost. Sorry raildogg

Israel = bad
Arab countries = good

did I find my way to the good side now?

thanks!

You're still lost buddy! It's funny that you talk sh!t about these Arab Country that your government support, and even some of them have relations with Israel while they treat their citizens like garbage.

Hypocrisy at it?s best! Go ahead and scream Freedom!

 

[raildogg]

Originally posted by: MegaWorks

Originally posted by: raildogg

Originally posted by: MegaWorks

raildogg is a nice guy, he's just lost. Sorry raildogg

Israel = bad
Arab countries = good

did I find my way to the good side now?

thanks!

You're still lost buddy! It's funny that you talk sh!t about these Arab Country that your government support, and even some of them have relations with Israel while they treat their citizens like garbage.

Hypocrisy at it?s best! Go ahead and scream Freedom!

what does that have anything to do with anything? Did I say I approve of my government having these type of relations with the Saudis?

wait, on second though

talk sh*t about Arab countries? No way!

why would I do that? these countries are what we should model ourselves on!

am I on the right track?

 

[MegaWorks]

No what bothers me is that you?re one of the biggest supporter of this government that claims it wants to spread freedom in the Middle East. But we all know it?s complete BS! You guys want puppets in this region; you want more Hosni Mubaraks and king Abdullah's.

 

[raildogg]

Originally posted by: MegaWorks
No what bothers me is that you?re one of the biggest supporter of this government that claims it wants to spread freedom in the Middle East. But we all know it?s complete BS! You guys want puppets in this region; you want more Hosni Mubaraks and king Abdullah's.

If it were up to me, we would have no relations with any of these countries over there. Egypt is one of the most oppressive countries in the world, yet we call it a freedom loving country. If it were up to me, I would classify Pakistan (not in the middle east, by the way) as a terrorist country, not an ally!

But thanks for confusing me with whatever you're thinking!