• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Iran ready to share nuclear know-how with other Islamic countries!!!

Let them all go nuclear.Then let them learn the doctrine of MAD.If they fail to learn, we win in the end.If they learn everybody wins.
 
nice, let them share, another reason for us to nuke the hell out of the middle east (excpet for Israel of course)
 
You know what really annoys me isn't that they are going nuclear it's that we aren't doing it for them. If we took what China is doing and started manufacturing those types of reactors we could just sell them to Iran.

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.09/china.html

That way they would have cheap power and they wouldn't be able to use the tech to build weapons. I also think we should start building them here as well.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Why not? If it keeps the rest of the Middle East from being invaded by power-hungry capitalists...
Click to expand...

But, there is no weapons program right?

:roll:
 
Muslim countries can't have the nuke, just Christian ones? The only way to get a chair at the world table is to go nuclear.
 
Originally posted by: Todd33
Muslim countries can't have the nuke, just Christian ones? The only way to get a chair at the world table is to go nuclear.
Click to expand...

Like that big ol Christian nation called China and the USSR before it.

 
Originally posted by: azazyel
You know what really annoys me isn't that they are going nuclear it's that we aren't doing it for them. If we took what China is doing and started manufacturing those types of reactors we could just sell them to Iran.

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.09/china.html

That way they would have cheap power and they wouldn't be able to use the tech to build weapons. I also think we should start building them here as well.
Click to expand...

Being a pro-US job nut and an anti trade deficit nut, I might just like your idea. 🙂

(oh, and none of the "you're simply a nut" jokes! 😛)
 
Originally posted by: Engineer

Being a pro-US job nut and an anti trade deficit nut, I might just like your idea. 🙂

(oh, and none of the "you're simply a nut" jokes! 😛)
Click to expand...

It just annoys me that there are so many opportunities for the US to increase it's production and strengthen in economy but we don't do it. I thought that was the point of having a Republican Party.

One of these reactors would only provide power for about 4K people but it is almost completely meltdown proof. It's clean, it's renewable and it's safe and the Chinese are growing the output potential. If we could get on board and start manufacturing some of the parts we can set them up here and sell them to the ME. And because they use graphite balls with only specks of uranium they can't make weapons out them and they would have no excuse to continue their program if we can provide the power cheaper.

Also the whole war on drugs thing annoys the hell out of me. I don't know how much but because of the 'war' we have to import all of our hemp material which could easily be grown and processed here. I'm sure you remember this...

"A founding father of the Reagan Revolution has put his John Hancock on a pro-pot report.

Milton Friedman leads a list of more than 500 economists from around the U.S. who today will publicly endorse a Harvard University economist's report on the costs of marijuana prohibition and the potential revenue gains from the U.S. government instead legalizing it and taxing its sale. Ending prohibition enforcement would save $7.7 billion in combined state and federal spending, the report says, while taxation would yield up to $6.2 billion a year."

http://www.forbes.com/services/2005/06/02/cz_qh_0602pot.html

 
Originally posted by: kermalou
nice, let them share, another reason for us to nuke the hell out of the middle east (excpet for Israel of course)
Click to expand...

Israel has nukes. The only way I'd even consider supporting nuking the mideast is if Israel got theirs too.
 
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Todd33
Muslim countries can't have the nuke, just Christian ones? The only way to get a chair at the world table is to go nuclear.
Click to expand...

Like that big ol Christian nation called China and the USSR before it.
Click to expand...

Or India and Pakistan, with the latter having the second largest Muslim population and the former not far behind them.

I'm more worried about Pakistan than Iran though.
 
share with me, share with me. not many islamic countries could build nuclear powerplants anyway. i'd like to see the palestinians even break ground. israel would bomb it the second the shovel hit the dirt
 
Originally posted by: Todd33
Muslim countries can't have the nuke, just Christian ones? The only way to get a chair at the world table is to go nuclear.
Click to expand...

I didnt know Russia, China, India, etc are "Christian countries."
 
"Bush spoke of the diplomatic progress he was making with Europe. [Clip of Bush: 'When we talk about Iran that's a place that I am getting good advice from European partners.'] Ohhh good advice? What did you learned from your European partners. [Clip of Bush: 'Iran is not Iraq.'] Although they do sound very similar. Are you sure you bombed the right one?"
--Jon Stewart

I keep saying, Jon Stewart is really on to something 😛

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top