Cerb
Elite Member
How is that misleading?Originally posted by: preslove
The battery life issue is misleading. Most of those other flash players take sing triple a batteries, whereas the suffle recharges from the usb port.
How is that misleading?Originally posted by: preslove
The battery life issue is misleading. Most of those other flash players take sing triple a batteries, whereas the suffle recharges from the usb port.
Sure, if you wanna what-if to death...I can think of reasons that 60 gb wouldn't be enough.Originally posted by: Cerb
Listen to five albums? No. But what if I am not at home, and I feel like listening to something that isn't on those five albums?Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Change it when you get home each night?Originally posted by: Cerb
Er, dude, 512MB is at most 7 albums (45min) at any decent quality. With newer albums (often ~60min), 4-5. That's not even what a CD can hold. And if you don't have a PC around with other music on it...well, what do you do if you're no longer in the mood for the music you stuck on there?Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Yeah, but unless you go on road trips every weekend, who really needs more than 512mb worth of music on their person? 😛Originally posted by: ElFenix
get a mini instead! (all part of steve job's evil plan... you go in there wanting a shuffle, and then you think... for just $50 more i can get 4x the storage and a screen!)
-Cerbie, who'd actually buy an Ipod if they were UMSDs.
If during the course of a normal day, you manage to listen to five albums enough that you get sick of them, then you probably have a pretty easy job...that will be done by robots soon. 😛
So I put on Dirt, Promised Land, Dvorak's no. 9, Toys in the Attic, and JCS...but then I feel like listening to some bluesy stuff. I'm screwed. Just accept that there's a reason larger capacity players exist in various kinds for good reason.
Lossless MP3s are an impossibility (transparent MP3s are not, though).Originally posted by: b0mbrman
I guess...if you feel compelled for some reason to have super-high quality, lossless MP3's that you're only gonna listen to through earbuds anyway...Originally posted by: Anubis
it has a useless amount of spaceOriginally posted by: b0mbrman
I can fill it with one...what's your point?Originally posted by: Anubis
i can fill 512 megs with 4 mp3sOriginally posted by: b0mbrman
Yeah, but unless you go on road trips every weekend, who really needs more than 512mb worth of music on their person? 😛Originally posted by: ElFenix
get a mini instead! (all part of steve job's evil plan... you go in there wanting a shuffle, and then you think... for just $50 more i can get 4x the storage and a screen!)
Originally posted by: preslove
The battery life issue is misleading. Most of those other flash players take sing triple a batteries, whereas the suffle recharges from the usb port.
AwesomeOriginally posted by: Cerb
Lossless MP3s are an impossibility (transparent MP3s are not, though).Originally posted by: b0mbrman
I guess...if you feel compelled for some reason to have super-high quality, lossless MP3's that you're only gonna listen to through earbuds anyway...Originally posted by: Anubis
it has a useless amount of spaceOriginally posted by: b0mbrman
I can fill it with one...what's your point?Originally posted by: Anubis
i can fill 512 megs with 4 mp3sOriginally posted by: b0mbrman
Yeah, but unless you go on road trips every weekend, who really needs more than 512mb worth of music on their person? 😛Originally posted by: ElFenix
get a mini instead! (all part of steve job's evil plan... you go in there wanting a shuffle, and then you think... for just $50 more i can get 4x the storage and a screen!)
Maybe so, but it's a lot better than 512MB. In fact, 1GB offers a significant amount of additional choice.Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Sure, if you wanna what-if to death...I can think of reasons that 60 gb wouldn't be enough.Originally posted by: Cerb
Listen to five albums? No. But what if I am not at home, and I feel like listening to something that isn't on those five albums?Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Change it when you get home each night?Originally posted by: Cerb
Er, dude, 512MB is at most 7 albums (45min) at any decent quality. With newer albums (often ~60min), 4-5. That's not even what a CD can hold. And if you don't have a PC around with other music on it...well, what do you do if you're no longer in the mood for the music you stuck on there?Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Yeah, but unless you go on road trips every weekend, who really needs more than 512mb worth of music on their person? 😛Originally posted by: ElFenix
get a mini instead! (all part of steve job's evil plan... you go in there wanting a shuffle, and then you think... for just $50 more i can get 4x the storage and a screen!)
-Cerbie, who'd actually buy an Ipod if they were UMSDs.
If during the course of a normal day, you manage to listen to five albums enough that you get sick of them, then you probably have a pretty easy job...that will be done by robots soon. 😛
So I put on Dirt, Promised Land, Dvorak's no. 9, Toys in the Attic, and JCS...but then I feel like listening to some bluesy stuff. I'm screwed. Just accept that there's a reason larger capacity players exist in various kinds for good reason.
Originally posted by: Cerb
How is that misleading?Originally posted by: preslove
The battery life issue is misleading. Most of those other flash players take sing triple a batteries, whereas the suffle recharges from the usb port.
A significant amount to the tune of...say...double?Originally posted by: Cerb
Maybe so, but it's a lot better than 512MB. In fact, 1GB offers a significant amount of additional choice.Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Sure, if you wanna what-if to death...I can think of reasons that 60 gb wouldn't be enough.Originally posted by: Cerb
Listen to five albums? No. But what if I am not at home, and I feel like listening to something that isn't on those five albums?Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Change it when you get home each night?Originally posted by: Cerb
Er, dude, 512MB is at most 7 albums (45min) at any decent quality. With newer albums (often ~60min), 4-5. That's not even what a CD can hold. And if you don't have a PC around with other music on it...well, what do you do if you're no longer in the mood for the music you stuck on there?Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Yeah, but unless you go on road trips every weekend, who really needs more than 512mb worth of music on their person? 😛Originally posted by: ElFenix
get a mini instead! (all part of steve job's evil plan... you go in there wanting a shuffle, and then you think... for just $50 more i can get 4x the storage and a screen!)
-Cerbie, who'd actually buy an Ipod if they were UMSDs.
If during the course of a normal day, you manage to listen to five albums enough that you get sick of them, then you probably have a pretty easy job...that will be done by robots soon. 😛
So I put on Dirt, Promised Land, Dvorak's no. 9, Toys in the Attic, and JCS...but then I feel like listening to some bluesy stuff. I'm screwed. Just accept that there's a reason larger capacity players exist in various kinds for good reason.
:laugh: $5 for AAA or AA batteries (1 in player, 1 in charger) that will last you several years (500-1000 charge cycles) is expensive? Even with a charger, that's only $25--less if you consider it worth the time to look for better prices.Originally posted by: preslove
Uhm... people are sh!tting on the shuffle for having crappy batter life when it recharges by itself. The other players have Tripple fvcing A batteries, which are expensive, especially as rechargeable.Originally posted by: Cerb
How is that misleading?Originally posted by: preslove
The battery life issue is misleading. Most of those other flash players take sing triple a batteries, whereas the suffle recharges from the usb port.
Yes. Almost exactly double. Strange how binary works. 🙂Originally posted by: b0mbrman
A significant amount to the tune of...say...double?Originally posted by: Cerb
Maybe so, but it's a lot better than 512MB. In fact, 1GB offers a significant amount of additional choice.Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Sure, if you wanna what-if to death...I can think of reasons that 60 gb wouldn't be enough.Originally posted by: Cerb
Listen to five albums? No. But what if I am not at home, and I feel like listening to something that isn't on those five albums?Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Change it when you get home each night?Originally posted by: Cerb
Er, dude, 512MB is at most 7 albums (45min) at any decent quality. With newer albums (often ~60min), 4-5. That's not even what a CD can hold. And if you don't have a PC around with other music on it...well, what do you do if you're no longer in the mood for the music you stuck on there?Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Yeah, but unless you go on road trips every weekend, who really needs more than 512mb worth of music on their person? 😛Originally posted by: ElFenix
get a mini instead! (all part of steve job's evil plan... you go in there wanting a shuffle, and then you think... for just $50 more i can get 4x the storage and a screen!)
-Cerbie, who'd actually buy an Ipod if they were UMSDs.
If during the course of a normal day, you manage to listen to five albums enough that you get sick of them, then you probably have a pretty easy job...that will be done by robots soon. 😛
So I put on Dirt, Promised Land, Dvorak's no. 9, Toys in the Attic, and JCS...but then I feel like listening to some bluesy stuff. I'm screwed. Just accept that there's a reason larger capacity players exist in various kinds for good reason.
Do iFanbois live under a rock, or what?Originally posted by: preslove
Uhm... people are sh!tting on the shuffle for having crappy batter life when it recharges by itself. The other players have Tripple fvcing A batteries, which are expensive, especially as rechargeable.
Not quite any proof, just a bunch of opinionated blubber.Originally posted by: Ornery
Are they good? Any problems with them? etc.)
They do too little for too much. Guess you have enough proof of that by now, no?
Originally posted by: blurredvision
Not quite any proof, just a bunch of opinionated blubber.Originally posted by: Ornery
Are they good? Any problems with them? etc.)
They do too little for too much. Guess you have enough proof of that by now, no?
Originally posted by: Ornery
What in that list is NOT true?
- They cost more
- No LCD
- Require iTunes software
- No FM
- Minimal battery life...
They cost more. What, $15? No LCD. They weren't designed with an LCD in mind, get over it. Require iTunes software, big deal. Companies require their own software all the time, it's nothing new. iTunes is definitely one of the leaders in the market, so atleast your being forced to use one of the best. No FM, I'll give you that. Minimal battery life, that subject has been beaten to death in this thread. It's perfectly understandable why it has a smaller battery life, and hell, 12 hours is nothing to scoff at. I'll gladly take a self-rechargable player over keeping up with batteries for an extra 4 hours. Depending on how much you use the player, you'll end up saving more money in the long run over saving $15 at the initial purchase.Originally posted by: Ornery
What in that list is NOT true?
- They cost more
- No LCD
- Require iTunes software
- No FM
- Minimal battery life...
Meh, I'd rather spend the extra $20 and keep the wear and tear off my PDA...but that's just how I get down.Originally posted by: Freejack2
Hmm, all this talk about ipods is making me more and more tempted to spend the $80 to get the headphone adapter and a 1gb sd card to turn my treo into a portable mp3 player. When Apple makes a combo cell phone, mp3 player, and pda device I'll pay attention to their products. Until then...