Discussion Intel's past, present and future

Page 48 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
3,386
3,275
106
However, even with commercially available technology, EMIB is evaluated as being difficult to manufacture ultra-large chips at the wafer level. For this reason, the industry believes that Intel may be considering new EMIB technology and facility investments for Dojo 3.
What's the die size for Dojo Cause GNR is pretty big it's around 2200mm2( 2.5X reticle) sq total silicon.
 

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
3,386
3,275
106
JFC Intel can't catch a break man.
Knowing Trump I know what happened he demanded Intel put more continue Ohio and stuff Intel refuses and we are here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and marees

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,951
5,267
106
IMG_2384.jpeg

What, is a good response. Earlier we got a US senator demanding the Intel board on Tans loyalty to the US of A.
 

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
3,386
3,275
106
Apple won’t. Tim Cook played Trump, you have to be smart and say that are doing it on paper without saying it directly.
I know that lol but can't say that about Trump it's going to be a repeat of Foxcon and this time it's going to large number of companies doing this lol
 

Josh128

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2022
1,102
1,666
106
Trumps public statements that LBT should resign seems like a shareholder lawsuit just waiting to happen. His words directly affect a companies stock performance, and he knows this. New laws may be written due to this very thing...

The train of society in America continues to derail. Whats next?
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,951
5,267
106
Trumps public statements that LBT should resign seems like a shareholder lawsuit just waiting to happen. His words directly affect a companies stock performance, and he knows this. New laws may be written due to this very thing...

The train of society in America continues to derail. Whats next?
What laws? Have you seen the state of Congress lately?
 

Win2012R2

Golden Member
Dec 5, 2024
1,058
1,091
96
Intel shareholders would sue Trump?
They got actionable case in case of tariffs which are clearly illegal, in fact all big firms affected by them should have already had lawsuit about that
It’s more like a kid throwing a tantrum, some appease their child but smart parents don’t give in.
It's a "kid" with a loaded gun and immunity
 

johnsonwax

Senior member
Jun 27, 2024
274
443
96
I mean has he thought where is apple going to find $600 Billion to invest in US Apple's Capex is like $10 Billion a year how can they invest $600 Billion by this capex.
Well, Apple can do that. They've returned $1T to shareholders, they can invest $600B in the US.

But I'll tell you a secret - all of the investments into the US that Trump is getting in his deals - from Apple, from TSMC, from the EU, from Japan? They're all meaningless. Trump knows they're meaningless, but he knows he has no leverage so he puts that forward as a way to save face for losing on a negotiation.
 

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
3,386
3,275
106
a
Well, Apple can do that. They've returned $1T to shareholders, they can invest $600B in the US.

But I'll tell you a secret - all of the investments into the US that Trump is getting in his deals - from Apple, from TSMC, from the EU, from Japan? They're all meaningless. Trump knows they're meaningless, but he knows he has no leverage so he puts that forward as a way to save face for losing on a negotiation.
i know that tbh i should edit my post people keep thinking i don't know that 🤣
 

Khato

Golden Member
Jul 15, 2001
1,257
328
136
While I have no notion of the reasons behind it, my current impression is that LBT is destroying Intel. Seems to be a classic, clueless CEO. Nothing he's promised has come to pass - there's just as much middle management and pointless meetings as ever. If anything there's more than there used to be... because the solution is always to fire engineers who do the work and hire outside 'expert' management. Hence I'll be quite happy if Trump gets his way and LBT is ousted. Intel was better off with their interim CEO structure... or just bring back Pat with a leash on foundry spending. If they hadn't ousted Pat, he likely would have played Trump like a fiddle and gotten Intel into a far, far better position by now. Instead it's been TSMC/Apple that have been whispering in Trump's ear and getting all the tariff carve outs to remain unaffected. Say what you will about Pat, but he knew how to play politics.
 

DZero

Golden Member
Jun 20, 2024
1,363
501
96
While I have no notion of the reasons behind it, my current impression is that LBT is destroying Intel. Seems to be a classic, clueless CEO. Nothing he's promised has come to pass - there's just as much middle management and pointless meetings as ever. If anything there's more than there used to be... because the solution is always to fire engineers who do the work and hire outside 'expert' management. Hence I'll be quite happy if Trump gets his way and LBT is ousted. Intel was better off with their interim CEO structure... or just bring back Pat with a leash on foundry spending. If they hadn't ousted Pat, he likely would have played Trump like a fiddle and gotten Intel into a far, far better position by now. Instead it's been TSMC/Apple that have been whispering in Trump's ear and getting all the tariff carve outs to remain unaffected. Say what you will about Pat, but he knew how to play politics.
Pat is the reason Intel is on that state in the first place.