Apparently yes. Given so, do you think 1.25B is ok?
I have a lot of confidence in Dirk, and I can only assume I am operating at a distinct deficit in terms of the specifics and the details of the settlement deal, so I am inclined to assume the deal is the best AMD rationalized they could carve out for themselves at this juncture.
I'm not saying $1.25B is too little compensation for the damages AMD suffered, my prior post was probably written poorly/hastily and I did not mean to create the impression that this was/is my opinion on the settlement, but rather I am saying I presumed AMD was going to enrich themselves far better than to the tune of $1.25B for the sake of their own financial future.
This hardly changes the playing field, the rate of change in the gap between Intel and AMD remains unaffected by this settlement and it is the rate of change in the gap that is suffocating AMD slowly but surely.
$1.25B in the coffers merely delays the inevitable but changes nothing of the probabilities of what the inevitable outcome entails.
The best thing AMD could do with that $1.25B is buy Intel stock. That way they are at least hedged against Intel being the progenitor of their own demise. If AMD dies because Intel triumphs then at least the 1.25B increases in value. If AMD pulls some miracle out of their collective managerial asses then Intel whithers and so too the value of that 1.25B INTC asset but only because AMD is doing so much better.
(kind of like the move TSMC just did with SMIC, not entirely the same, by analogous in some ways)