• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Intel system bulid advice

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Lord ZipLoc
thanks for all the help, the psu it coems with is 420w is that its too little power or just not name brand also which psu would you guys recommend and also stevty2889 what did you overclock the card to in terms of mhz and did you did it the bios?

I overclocked it using the software that came with the card. Running at 550/1025 over the stock 500/1000. Haven't tried to go higher yet, but it might be able to handle more. Antec, enermax, fortron, seasonic, OCZ, and Xclio are good brands for PSU's, there are others as well. Your's might be ok, but personaly I would rather get a brand I know I can trust.
 
Originally posted by: boshuter
Originally posted by: shoRunner
i'd say go with the 550, its faster and the same price. it may not be 64 bit, but intel in a 64 bit environment are slower.


That is simply not true, the 500 series are not faster in any bench I've ever run them in. I have a 571 3.8es, a 650 3.4es, and a 660 3.6es. The 571 and the 660 will both do 4.45ghz and running the same benches the 660 outscores the 571 by a significant amount. The 2mb cache does wonders:thumbsup:

it really all depends on the benchmark
 
Originally posted by: shoRunner
Originally posted by: boshuter
Originally posted by: shoRunner
i'd say go with the 550, its faster and the same price. it may not be 64 bit, but intel in a 64 bit environment are slower.


That is simply not true, the 500 series are not faster in any bench I've ever run them in. I have a 571 3.8es, a 650 3.4es, and a 660 3.6es. The 571 and the 660 will both do 4.45ghz and running the same benches the 660 outscores the 571 by a significant amount. The 2mb cache does wonders:thumbsup:

it really all depends on the benchmark


Sure it does.. :roll:
 
Back
Top