• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Intel Skylake / Kaby Lake

Page 44 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Not really, I already said about HSW power saving features. When software reads the core frequency the core needs to be active in order to do so. IOW when CPU-z is reading the frequency then bclk should not be in a power saving state. So the question remains. Why is it showing 24MHz?

A screenshot of SKL running 100MHz bclk would suffice to answer the question. 😉

Uhm... one of the earlier leaks?

JV57um2.jpg
 
Lets hope final results are better than that. It is only a 7 to 10 percent gain depending on turbo behavior, and that is for 2 generations. Even worse, it is not a consistent across the board gain. Most of the results are pretty much a wash, with the gains coming mainly from AES. The more leaks we see, the less optimistic I am becoming.
 
They're higher cause of DDR4 I bet, it seems that Skylake refresh is the one to get just like Devil's Canyon unless of course one's in desperate need of it 😛

Its quite clear that its hold back for a refresh. But thats what we need to get used to after Atoms kicked Core desktops down on the node priority list.

The DDR3 SKUs should also be 1866Mhz standard. At least thats what i saw on the Skylake NUCs.
 
Well, maybe the memory bandwidth will help igpu performance if anybody really cares on the desktop. Is mobile skylake DDR4 also?

Even broadwell was accepted to have about 5% better ipc than Haswell. Maybe skylake final shipping products in real x86 apps will show up better. I dont really know how relevant Geekbench is for x86, but it seems to be becoming the go-to measurement.
 
If these are any indication of real world performance Skylake is shaping up to be pretty sad. Then again geekbench is a terrible measurement.
 
Back
Top