Intel processors crashing Unreal engine games (and others)

Page 62 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
6,598
13,938
136
Here's a sample of the PR hell I talked about in my previous post:
At the end of the day, it felt like Intel was grasping at straws. They pounced at the opportunity to claim that one of the CPUs was a tray product, citing a serial number that was never even provided. Then when that didn't pan out, they pivoted to claiming it was re-marked. When I pressed them, giving several pieces of evidence for why each one was indeed valid, they stated I could continue with the RMA process but then turned to threatening me with confiscation or destruction of my property if it didn't meet whatever their validation process (that they won't disclose) is. The odds of both of these being re-marked or not genuine seem extremely low. It's definitely a scare tactic. And even knowing this, it worked on me! This feels like extortion, scamming, you name it.

Even if Intel was right and both CPUs are re-marked, the way they handle the process in the light of the current situation is very bad to say the least. And keep in mind they had months to prepare for this, they don't get to claim this issue took them by surprise, with support needing more time to adjust.


[Later Edit] Oh look, they're at it again with the sneaky reddit info dissemination!

Oxidation Issue
The Via Oxidation issue currently reported in the press is a minor one that was addressed with manufacturing improvements and screens in early 2023.

The issue was identified in late 2022, and with the manufacturing improvements and additional screens implemented Intel was able to confirm full removal of impacted processors in our supply chain by early 2024. However, on-shelf inventory may have persisted into early 2024 as a result.


Minor manufacturing issues are an inescapable fact with all silicon products. Intel continuously works with customers to troubleshoot and remediate product failure reports and provides public communications on product issues when the customer risk exceeds Intel quality control thresholds.

So they just admitted a full year worth of CPUs produced in at least one location was subject to manufacturing defects. This is getting worse and worse, they knowingly sold faulty CPUs for an extended period of time. All of this feels surreal to me.
 
Last edited:

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
29,478
24,210
146
This bomb has had an odd mushroom shaped cloud rising up from it since the beginning.

They know the oxidation issues are about to be fully revealed by GN's investigation. So now they are revising their statements to include the fact those CPUs were still for sale in '24. Latent defects with strict liability is probably going to be served up along with a laundry list of others.

Stock is at $23 or so after hours. Chickens are coming home to roost.
 

Steltek

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2001
3,200
977
136
Stock is at $23 or so after hours. Chickens are coming home to roost.
That drop was solely due to the disastrous 2nd quarter earnings report alone. These chip issues aren't really even on the radar of most investors yet -- the company is playing it off with the analysts as a problem with a coming fix being cited every time in the same sentence.

I think their Come to Jesus moment will be the earnings reports for 3rd and 4th quarters of this year once their "fix" is released and the company can't hide the truth any longer from the greater media, i.e. that it doesn't actually fix any of their liabilities (just maybe prevent future ones, IF it even works).

Personally, I suspect that Intel as a company is done. Every major customer they've ever casually insulted by their high-handed, obnoxious past behaviors now have no reason not to remember every slight that Intel ever put them through. Intel's reputation for product quality was the only thing keeping them in the game before, but that is long gone at this point.

I predict bankruptcy is on the not too distant horizon, with a their money pit foundries either being spun of ala AMD and Global Foundries or sold outright.
 

Turbonium

Platinum Member
Mar 15, 2003
2,143
80
91
So silly question, but once I get my Alder Lake CPU in, should I wait for the mid-August microcode update before I swap it into the board? I'd imagine I don't have to, given it's not a 13th or 14th gen. Still, I am unsure.
 

H433x0n

Golden Member
Mar 15, 2023
1,166
1,510
96
Puget Systems published a blog about this issue.

However they set up their systems must work since their internal data shows 13th/14th gen reliability is similar/better than 11th gen.

Edit: These systems are based off of i7/i9 SKUs so it’s not artificially boosted by the presence of low clocking SKUs.
 
Last edited:

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
29,478
24,210
146
While this isn't the thread GN chose to reference (for good reason, Kocicak's is much older) here is the first takedown vid-


Nothing we don't already know, as I presumed. The good stuff will come when the FA lab and the deeper dive are shared.

Perfect closing statement about how Alder Lake was a promising return to form, and they blew it and failed hard.
 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,768
1,211
136
While this isn't the thread GN chose to reference (for good reason, Kocicak's is much older) here is the first takedown vid-


Nothing we don't already know, as I presumed. The good stuff will come when the FA lab and the deeper dive are shared.

Perfect closing statement about how Alder Lake was a promising return to form, and they blew it and failed hard.
the big standout to me was the talk about the wafer FOUP carriers getting held up between stations for too long leading to oxidation.

that seems like a fundamental failing in operations. which i guess jives with the leaks about the fab side running on skeleton crew levels of staff.
 

Ranulf

Platinum Member
Jul 18, 2001
2,510
1,571
136
Saw this mentioned over at OCUK's forum on this stuff.. From the GN video, about 35m40s in, talking about reddit moderator dropping that game dev's post to the intel subreddit asking questions last week or so. Allegedly this reddit mod also works at Tom's Hardware, I can't confirm that though. GN's video mentioned that the post gets taken down there but the mods let an anti-amd post stay in, not being off-topic.

Edit: Albert Thomas, freelancer at TH is the guy apparently.

Screenshot 2024-08-03 at 04-50-05 bizude (u_bizude) - R[...].png
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,050
10,381
136
While this isn't the thread GN chose to reference (for good reason, Kocicak's is much older) here is the first takedown vid-


Nothing we don't already know, as I presumed. The good stuff will come when the FA lab and the deeper dive are shared.

Perfect closing statement about how Alder Lake was a promising return to form, and they blew it and failed hard.

Intel acknowledging the oxidation issue started in 2022 and telling partners it wasn’t fully addressed until April 2024 was new to me.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
29,478
24,210
146
Intel acknowledging the oxidation issue started in 2022 and telling partners it wasn’t fully addressed until April 2024 was new to me.
Post 1526 at the top of this page ^

GN did a good job of laying out the chronology of all the anti consumer and dirtbag moves. I expect the next video to have juicier stuff from sources. Intel employees mostly stonewalled and refused to answer questions. I was stoked Steve said Intel can pound sand now. I have been SMDH at Intel failing to control the narrative for months, now they have lost the most trusted platform in the enthusiast space for getting their propaganda...um statements out.

back-to-you-steve-steve.gif
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,050
10,381
136
Post 1526 at the top of this page ^

GN did a good job of laying out the chronology of all the anti consumer and dirtbag moves. I expect the next video to have juicier stuff from sources. Intel employees mostly stonewalled and refused to answer questions. I was stoked Steve said Intel can pound sand now. I have been SMDH at Intel failing to control the narrative for months, now they have lost the most trusted platform in the enthusiast space for getting their propaganda...um statements out.

back-to-you-steve-steve.gif

Those sneaky edits, lol.
 

gdansk

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2011
2,843
4,228
136
I truly hope Intel comes out of the many messes it's in as a strong competitor in the CPU market.

You may not like them, but we still need them. The enthusiast landscape would be bleak otherwise.
Sure. We don't want them to die.

But I'm not optimistic about their QC/validation for a while - they might even be hit by these layoffs.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
29,478
24,210
146
I truly hope Intel comes out of the many messes it's in as a strong competitor in the CPU market.

You may not like them, but we still need them. The enthusiast landscape would be bleak otherwise.
This has nothing to do with liking them or not. They are like an addict; this is the intervention. Running with the analogy:

once they payback everyone they begged, borrowed, or stole money from to support their habit, get the help they need, and come out the other side clean and ready to rejoin society, I will welcome them with open arms. Until then it's tough love as the expression has it. I will always be on the side of my fellow consumers vs corpo scum.

We need competition, not necessarily Intel.
ARM is rising. My psychotic... um I meant psychic, yeah that's the ticket, psychic powers tell me, all Nvidia gaming boxes are coming. It'll even have it's own OS like the Steam Deck.

Doesn't matter really, Intel sitting in the backseat until AMD is at least 50% market share in every segment, is the best thing that could happen. Then and only then will we have true competition. Because Intel has been anti competition and anti consumer for far too long. They need to get back to understanding the customer is the boss, not them. I am going to have schadenfreude if Dell is hit hard by this. They have been doing the Predator arm wrestling meme with Intel for far too long.
 

Nothingness

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2013
3,031
1,971
136
We need competition, not necessarily Intel.
Agreed. But what company could replace Intel as an x86 CPU maker? Intel has behaved evilishly for too long, but they have great engineers and a lot of accumulated knowledge. On top of that if Intel collapses, predatory patent houses might get hold of parts of the Intel porfolio and attack all other CPU makers, including outside the x86 world. That could be a disaster.

There is competition on the Arm front in some segments. But at least one is missing: the gaming market. Sure it might change, but we're far from being there. And I don't think having AMD as the sole player would do any good to us.