Originally posted by: kamranziadar
Sorry i pressed twiced.
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: kamranziadar
Sorry i pressed twiced.
and instead of editing your second post, you went ahead and made a third. :thumbsup:
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Welcome to the forums. To learn your way around you should:
1. Use search to see the last 1,000 times this was asked.
2. Click the CPU/Chipsets tab at the top of the screen and Read The Friendly Articles.
Good questions bring helpful responses.
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: kamranziadar
Sorry i pressed twiced.
and instead of editing your second post, you went ahead and made a third. :thumbsup:
Originally posted by: belazeru
I know the T-Birds and XP offered a superior price/performance ratio compared to the pentiums of that time. Im not so sure if the same price performace ratio is still valid when comparing Athlon 64s to the Pentium Prescotts or Extreme editions.
Yup ! I agree.Originally posted by: DarkKnight
AMD all the way, in high performance, midrange,. and lowend.
Originally posted by: kimchee411
AMD is clearly a much better bang for the buck. But my needs aren't so demanding that I need to get THE fastest computer I possibly can, and since they can run more quiet, I'd buy a P4 so I can sleep at night.
Originally posted by: kimchee411
AMD is clearly a much better bang for the buck. But my needs aren't so demanding that I need to get THE fastest computer I possibly can, and since they can run more quiet, I'd buy a P4 so I can sleep at night.
Originally posted by: kimchee411
AMD is clearly a much better bang for the buck. But my needs aren't so demanding that I need to get THE fastest computer I possibly can, and since they can run more quiet, I'd buy a P4 so I can sleep at night.
Originally posted by: belazeru
I was just wonder which company makes better procs?
