Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads

Page 194 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
942
857
106
Wildcat Lake (WCL) Specs

Intel Wildcat Lake (WCL) is upcoming mobile SoC replacing Raptor Lake-U. WCL consists of 2 tiles: compute tile and PCD tile. It is true single die consists of CPU, GPU and NPU that is fabbed by 18-A process. Last time I checked, PCD tile is fabbed by TSMC N6 process. They are connected through UCIe, not D2D; a first from Intel. Expecting launching in Q1 2026.

Intel Raptor Lake UIntel Wildcat Lake 15W?Intel Lunar LakeIntel Panther Lake 4+0+4
Launch DateQ1-2024Q2-2026Q3-2024Q1-2026
ModelIntel 150UIntel Core 7Core Ultra 7 268VCore Ultra 7 365
Dies2223
NodeIntel 7 + ?Intel 18-A + TSMC N6TSMC N3B + N6Intel 18-A + Intel 3 + TSMC N6
CPU2 P-core + 8 E-cores2 P-core + 4 LP E-cores4 P-core + 4 LP E-cores4 P-core + 4 LP E-cores
Threads12688
Max Clock5.4 GHz?5 GHz4.8 GHz
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB12 MB
TDP15 - 55 W15 W ?17 - 37 W25 - 55 W
Memory128-bit LPDDR5-520064-bit LPDDR5128-bit LPDDR5x-8533128-bit LPDDR5x-7467
Size96 GB32 GB128 GB
Bandwidth136 GB/s
GPUIntel GraphicsIntel GraphicsArc 140VIntel Graphics
RTNoNoYESYES
EU / Xe96 EU2 Xe8 Xe4 Xe
Max Clock1.3 GHz?2 GHz2.5 GHz
NPUGNA 3.018 TOPS48 TOPS49 TOPS






PPT1.jpg
PPT2.jpg
PPT3.jpg



As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



LNL-MX.png
 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,044
  • LNL.png
    LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,531
  • INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg
    INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg
    181.4 KB · Views: 72,439
  • Clockspeed.png
    Clockspeed.png
    611.8 KB · Views: 72,326
Last edited:

lightisgood

Senior member
May 27, 2022
250
121
86

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,383
4,096
136
Actually, MTL's NOC fabric is extremely power efficient and far more power efficient than AMD's Infinity fabric. The single culprit for higher power draw in MTL is the CPU tile (RWC) itself. Maybe requires a pcode update or is just plain bad considering it is an ageing design. Either way, it's time for RWC to go away.
Before we throw RWC into the trash can let's see some head-to-head power results of RWC on Intel 4 vs. RPC on Intel 7.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: igor_kavinski
Jul 27, 2020
28,174
19,217
146
Before we throw RWC into the trash can
I'm just trying to understand why people hate it so much. I mean, Hello. No one threw the Skylake derivatives into the trash. In fact, people happily paid money for 10900K CPUs. Everyone hating RWC should just chill. In monolithic form, I'm sure it would've been nice. It just can't put its best foot forward due to Intel desperately trying to make up for all its missteps over the past several years by putting it in a disaggregated tile arch.
 

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,924
1,284
106
This is based on what?
Based on the NoC itself. It was acquired by Keller himself I think. One of it's primary goals of the NoC is to reduce SoC power. It's more power efficient than the bus it replaces as the links are somehow packetized like in a LAN. The tile-to-tile NoC links are handled by Foveros which has one of the Industries highest power efficiency. The NoC by itself cannot be the source of the high power draw we see in some of the MTL power usage tests.
 

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,924
1,284
106
I'm just trying to understand why people hate it so much. I mean, Hello. No one threw the Skylake derivatives into the trash. In fact, people happily paid money for 10900K CPUs. Everyone hating RWC should just chill. In monolithic form, I'm sure it would've been nice. It just can't put its best foot forward due to Intel desperately trying to make up for all its missteps over the past several years by putting it in a disaggregated tile arch.
I remember seeing a slide posted in this forum by one of the members a while back which clearly showed that RWC is actually more a derivative of GLC rather than RPC. Even including all the power and performance optimizations in RWC, it's still putting a lipstick on a hog, because GLC & RPC are power hogs. Without a doubt, RWC is the weakest link in the (MTL) chain imho.
 
Jul 27, 2020
28,174
19,217
146
Without a doubt, RWC is the weakest link in the (MTL) chain imho.
Since Intel announced before Alder Lake that they made their architectures process node agnostic, I wonder why they didn't just bring LNC forward in Meteor Lake? Being lazy and overconfident as usual, I suppose?
 

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,924
1,284
106
Since Intel announced before Alder Lake that they made their architectures process node agnostic, I wonder why they didn't just bring LNC forward in Meteor Lake? Being lazy and overconfident as usual, I suppose?
A new architecture like LNC is a monumental task that takes a lot of time I think. RWC development started way too early. If I remember right, MTL CPU tile taped-in long ago. And ARL CPU tile taped-in only very recently I think. Thats a long gap. LNC never stood a chance (with MTL) as Intel was playing it very safe. It's gonna be very interesting when LNC debuts with ARL though.
 

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
7,484
17,882
136
I remember seeing a slide posted in this forum by one of the members a while back which clearly showed that RWC is actually more a derivative of GLC rather than RPC. Even including all the power and performance optimizations in RWC, it's still putting a lipstick on a hog, because GLC & RPC are power hogs. Without a doubt, RWC is the weakest link in the (MTL) chain imho.
So, just for the record, your though Intel was going to dominate mobile with lipstick on a power hog?
 

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,924
1,284
106
So, just for the record, your though Intel was going to dominate mobile with lipstick on a power hog?
Not really. Like I keep saying often, the strength of MTL lies in it's LP E cores. The CPU tile should fire up only when needed and shouldn't be much of a problem in everyday workloads. At least, thats the whole idea.

It'll be interesting to see the results when more OEMs release their MTL laptops soon.
 

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,924
1,284
106
Of course the CPU tile will turn on and turn off constantly and I think it'll look more like this in real world scenario. Just sayin...

1703261461663.jpeg

Overall, the CPU tile power usage shouldn't be a big deal during average everyday use.
 

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
4,384
2,762
106

MTL NPU loses to Ryzen in a couple tests. But it wins by a good margin too. The real AI match will begin on release of Windows 12.
I guess Snapdragon X Elite will be crushing those tests, thanks to the whopping 45 TOPS of NPU and combined 75 TOPS for the SoC.

Atleast until Strix Point and Arrow Lake arrive I guess.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
23,219
13,300
136
Next-Gen AMD 700-Series “AM5” & Intel 800-Series “LGA 1851” Socket Motherboards Aiming Q3 2024 Launch

So, Arrow Lake-S should launch in 3Q24.

Intel could put Raptor Lake Refresh on that socket as well. There's no indicator that Arrow Lake will launch before October of next year.