Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads

Page 183 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
820
785
106
PPT1.jpg
PPT2.jpg
PPT3.jpg



As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



LNL-MX.png

Intel Core Ultra 100 - Meteor Lake

INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg

As mentioned by Tomshardware, TSMC will manufacture the I/O, SoC, and GPU tiles. That means Intel will manufacture only the CPU and Foveros tiles. (Notably, Intel calls the I/O tile an 'I/O Expander,' hence the IOE moniker.)



Clockspeed.png
 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,028
  • LNL.png
    LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,521
Last edited:

Khato

Golden Member
Jul 15, 2001
1,275
351
136
A bug whose correction improve perf/watt by 20%..?..
And you think that Intel engineers were unaware of the thing till launch day..?.
Yup.

Two distinct possibilities as to why the early review samples had months old pcode. First is that's the pcode version manufacturers were originally supplied with when starting their product validation and no one told them that they needed to update before sending out the review samples. Second is that it was intentional - get one mixed review cycle on launch, then get a second thanks to this large efficiency improvement as more laptop designs become available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: controlflow

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
32GB is the new 8GB.
Considering a lot of laptops have non-removable memory, It's stupid to buy anything less than 16GB, honestly, even that is not much If you have an IGP and want the laptop to be at least a bit future-proof.
Meteor Lake in the Ark

No base frequency spec for base power, which is strange?
Max frequency for SoC island CPU's is 2.5GHz.
185H being listed as launched Q4 '24. Really?

I see there Q4'23.
Screenshot_3.pngScreenshot_4.png
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,869
12,931
136
It would seem that some people are still clueless about how PL1/2 and Tau works on Intel mobile CPUs since Tiger Lake. As a result, they clutter these Intel threads with useless information and analyses.
It would seem that if Intel releases a product that does not hold up to the same testing regime that has been used for mobile CPUs for years, that Intel has a problem. Not the reviewers.
 

Khato

Golden Member
Jul 15, 2001
1,275
351
136
For all the noise that both Intel and AMD wish to make about the AI PC, they really need to hand-hold some reviewers or something to get such included in benchmark suites. The notebookcheck.com variant of their review included the UL Procyon AI Inference benchmark run on both GPU and NPU to compare performance and power, but there aren't any other comparison points of interest. (Summary of those results by the way is GPU is around 10% faster than NPU, but basically twice the power.) Have there been any reviews of MTL or Phoenix that properly dig into the NPU performance and efficiency? Or are we just supposed to take Intel's and AMD's word that these are magical IP blocks because they can be used for AI?
 

controlflow

Member
Feb 17, 2015
195
339
136
For all the noise that both Intel and AMD wish to make about the AI PC, they really need to hand-hold some reviewers or something to get such included in benchmark suites. The notebookcheck.com variant of their review included the UL Procyon AI Inference benchmark run on both GPU and NPU to compare performance and power, but there aren't any other comparison points of interest. (Summary of those results by the way is GPU is around 10% faster than NPU, but basically twice the power.) Have there been any reviews of MTL or Phoenix that properly dig into the NPU performance and efficiency? Or are we just supposed to take Intel's and AMD's word that these are magical IP blocks because they can be used for AI?
Have not seen much beyond this.

The claim is that CPU is best for low latency. GPU wins for throughput and NPU wins for efficiency/lowest energy cost for completing the task.
1702768870319.png
 

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,600
6,084
136
Careful there, the BestBuy full specs list says:
"System Memory (RAM)

32 gigabytes
Type of Memory (RAM)

LPDDR5X
System Memory RAM Speed

6400 megahertz"

Wouldn't be the first time a brand shipped its fastest configuration for the review only to quietly downgrade components for the mass market version hoping no one notices.
 

controlflow

Member
Feb 17, 2015
195
339
136
Careful there, the BestBuy full specs list says:
"System Memory (RAM)

32 gigabytes
Type of Memory (RAM)

LPDDR5X
System Memory RAM Speed

6400 megahertz"

Wouldn't be the first time a brand shipped its fastest configuration for the review only to quietly downgrade components for the mass market version hoping no one notices.

The Best Buy spec list is probably wrong. Up until today it also incorrectly listed the display as an IPS panel (corrected to OLED now) and it still claims it has Intel UHD graphics. It also had the wrong processor name yesterday and they updated that too.

Here is the official specs from Asus

The memory claims "Up to 32 GB LPDDR5x 7467 MHz RAM". I suppose the "up to" implies there can be some slower configurations...
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,136
3,719
136
MLID prognostications from May.

Just about everything was wrong.

Computer Architecture
Launches Q3 as 14th gen on desktop and 14th gen "HX" on laptop
5.4GHz boost for 45W models and 5.2GHz boost for 28W "H" Models
12-21% IPC increase over Raptor Lake
6+6 and 2+8 dies
Project IPC increase for Crestmont is +8% over Gracemont
Up to 10% IPC increase over Raptor Lake
512MB Adamantine prototypes being tested
30 to 45% less power at ISO frequency compared to Raptor Refresh below 45W
ARL and MTL share the same base tile so Intel could launch ARL with last gen Battlemage graphics if Lion Cove is ahead of schedule.
 

controlflow

Member
Feb 17, 2015
195
339
136
MLID prognostications from May.

Just about everything was wrong.

Computer Architecture
Launches Q3 as 14th gen on desktop and 14th gen "HX" on laptop
5.4GHz boost for 45W models and 5.2GHz boost for 28W "H" Models
12-21% IPC increase over Raptor Lake
6+6 and 2+8 dies
Project IPC increase for Crestmont is +8% over Gracemont
Up to 10% IPC increase over Raptor Lake
512MB Adamantine prototypes being tested
30 to 45% less power at ISO frequency compared to Raptor Refresh below 45W
ARL and MTL share the same base tile so Intel could launch ARL with last gen Battlemage graphics if Lion Cove is ahead of schedule.
It really amazes me that the nonsense this clown spews gets so much coverage and stated as news or facts by so many outlets. He is a random guy making YouTube videos out of his attic and his videos make it abundantly clear that he doesn't even have a technical understanding of any of the topics he tries to cover.
 

Saylick

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2012
4,005
9,402
136
It really amazes me that the nonsense this clown spews gets so much coverage and stated as news or facts by so many outlets. He is a random guy making YouTube videos out of his attic and his videos make it abundantly clear that he doesn't even have a technical understanding of any of the topics he tries to cover.
True, but what is also true is that the current state of tech journalism, especially as it pertains to semiconductors, is pretty bad. It's comprised of a bunch of people who don't have a formal background in electrical engineering or software engineering regurgitating whatever is currently trending on the internet, namely Twitter leaks, or just acting as a corporate mouthpiece by making puff pieces. Who cares about accuracy and legitimacy when pumping out crummy articles to rake in ad revenue trumps all? If a crappy site like WTFTech can succeed in today's tech journalism market by purely churning out articles faster and in higher quantities than its competitors, that says a lot imo. The authors there literally were just a bunch of college hacks who turned a hobby into a full-time hustle. I'll give them credit for working harder than the rest, but the bar is super low. I'd argue there's easily dozens of enthusiasts on AT Forum who are more knowledgeable than MLID or the authors at click-bait tech sites, but the reason why we don't make our own website is that we simply have better things to do (like typing out a long rant about said websites :p ).
 

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
4,384
2,761
106
MLID prognostications from May.

Just about everything was wrong.

Computer Architecture
Launches Q3 as 14th gen on desktop and 14th gen "HX" on laptop
5.4GHz boost for 45W models and 5.2GHz boost for 28W "H" Models
12-21% IPC increase over Raptor Lake
6+6 and 2+8 dies
Project IPC increase for Crestmont is +8% over Gracemont
Up to 10% IPC increase over Raptor Lake
512MB Adamantine prototypes being tested
30 to 45% less power at ISO frequency compared to Raptor Refresh below 45W
ARL and MTL share the same base tile so Intel could launch ARL with last gen Battlemage graphics if Lion Cove is ahead of schedule.
You forgot to mention that he retracted a lot of this stuff later, in the months leading up to MTL launch.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,136
3,719
136
You forgot to mention that he retracted a lot of this stuff later, in the months leading up to MTL launch.
Yeah so when you're far out from launch just make things up. As actual information becomes available change your earlier predictions, which were of course how you got the views in the first place. Brilliant and perfectly circular.
 

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,924
1,284
106
It really amazes me that the nonsense this clown spews gets so much coverage and stated as news or facts by so many outlets. He is a random guy making YouTube videos out of his attic and his videos make it abundantly clear that he doesn't even have a technical understanding of any of the topics he tries to cover.
The last one is very true. He seriously lacks technical understanding.