Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Featured
Forums
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
C
controlflow
Member
Messages
132
Featured content
0
Profile views
246
Reaction score
213
Points
116
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Last seen
Yesterday at 5:48 PM
Find
Find content
Find all content by controlflow
Find all threads by controlflow
Latest activity
Postings
Featured content
About
Trophies
C
controlflow
reacted to
dullard's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
Nice list of grievances. Mind if I modify it? 1. ARL in October that barely moves the performance meter, especially in ST (and this...
Yesterday at 5:52 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
DavidC1's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
Again, why not just wait until it's review day for both? It's pointless. SpeedMark, Geekbench, CrossMark, and Cinebench has their own...
Yesterday at 5:45 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
dullard's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
Great, then please list your known Intel clocks for all upcoming Arrow Lake chips here, known final performances here, known Arrow Lake...
Thursday at 5:47 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
dullard's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
Why wait? We don't know final clocks (although the rumors are likely true), final microcode impacts, final price, final availability...
Thursday at 12:35 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
dullard's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
Mikk is correct. Intel uses the label "estimate" because the products are not yet released and SPEC often requires that label. Below...
Thursday at 12:35 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
mikk's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
Estimate is also tested, Intel always uses the term estimate and people don't get it.
Thursday at 12:34 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
coercitiv's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
It was supposedly going to get more performance by: having more cache running fabrics at higher speeds, lowering internal latencies...
Thursday at 12:33 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
CouncilorIrissa's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
Intel literally published the data a month and a half ago, +14% over RWC that is marginally slower than RPC. +14% IPC at -8% clock speed...
Thursday at 12:31 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
AMDK11's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
However, I will wait for the final tests and the IPC (LionCove) increase compared to RaptorCove before I finally evaluate ArrowLake.
Thursday at 12:31 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
H433x0n's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
You listed 2 things, not 3. N3B is advertised as -1% to +4% performance improvement OR +3% to +8% efficiency advantage over N4P. For...
Wednesday at 11:37 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
H433x0n's post
in the thread
Discussion
Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
with
Like
.
That was never the consensus viewpoint. There was never any evidence to expect anymore than 1-2% IPC over LNL’s version of Lion Cove...
Wednesday at 11:36 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
CouncilorIrissa's post
in the thread
Discussion
Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)
with
Haha
.
The 32% meme propelled this thread to 662 pages. It's not something that you erase at this point :p
Wednesday at 5:02 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
lucasworais's post
in the thread
Discussion
Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)
with
Haha
.
+32% IPC Zen5 on August 15th!!
Wednesday at 4:55 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
CouncilorIrissa's post
in the thread
Discussion
Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)
with
Like
.
No, CPU design and manufacturing is just complicated. These companies are packed with talented and highly professional people, yet...
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
C
controlflow
reacted to
SarahKerrigan's post
in the thread
Discussion
Zen 5 Architecture & Technical discussion
with
Like
.
I think such claims are best viewed with a healthy skepticism. The history of claims of "just you wait! This will be so much faster when...
Wednesday at 4:52 PM
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
RESOURCES
Advertising
Cookies Policies
Privacy
Term & Conditions
FOLLOW
Facebook
Twitter
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…