Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread

Page 938 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Geddagod

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2021
1,671
1,703
136
AMD is not taking Intel market share anymore in CPU 🤣🤣
Prob not client esp after NVL launch but server results from AMD are going to be.... interesting.
Those have no customers.
Even if they don't it's still very weird Intel isn't saying anything....
While they mention Coral Rapids time and again they don't make any mention of
DMR-HD(RRF) or their E-core server roadmap.
Hmph
RTB(Rialto) was incremental/~30%? over PVC, even worse wrt timing.
Apparently PVC being recognized as one GPU was scuffed af so maybe RTB improved that situation
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
8,457
11,187
106
  • Like
Reactions: Joe NYC

Geddagod

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2021
1,671
1,703
136
NVL is garbage with no 1t, DOA for 2027.

It's a dead product when it haez no customers.

Really hard to pretend it's a single GPU when the d2d link was like a few hundred GB/s.
Yes I was informed of that a few weeks ago I did (edit:not) know the interconnect bandwidth was that poor originally
 
Last edited:

regen1

Senior member
Aug 28, 2025
351
432
96
Microscopic volume footprint.
Chinese seem to like it, majority of it went to them iirc. Good for video(web/media) for what matters to them. Even the 288 core version of SRF did go to them which wasn't generally available.
It was optimistically Turin-D perf at hella money.
Probably will win in some and lose in others, still could've been better than now it's coming when Venice is around the corner.

See, that's the thing, Graviton and friends are not really core spam platforms per se; they focus very much on scale up perf.
Ampere is dead for the same reasons Atom Xeons are dead.
Graviton 4 was easy for SRF and easier for CWF. CWF would be fine against Graviton 5. Atom/E-core Xeon even if dead could be temporary as it's supposed to be the main thing("Unified") in the future.
It gets vivisected by the SP7 Venice.
Never had any chances.
Doesn't always matter what AMD does. They have been winning for long but there's enough room for Intel, (ICL, SPR, EMR, GNR) Xeons still get sold plenty.
DMR-HD/RRF is way more complete than CWF, SRF wrt fabric, CPU perf, SIMD, etc. and it would've(theoretically) significantly better PPA than DMR-AP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 511 and Joe NYC

regen1

Senior member
Aug 28, 2025
351
432
96
Cancelling the nearby products(DMR-SP and more? for whatever reasons) and talking something up that's quite distant. All the Coral Rapid hype build up and there might be Zen 7 not too distant(timing-wise). Lot of the strategy seems dependent on CPU demand-rise and Nvidia-deal.

Apparently PVC being recognized as one GPU was scuffed af so maybe RTB improved that situation
RTB had same D2D as PVC iirc but have to check. Only Xe-Link B/W was doubled(same Xe-Link as PVC but fully enabled) plus other improvements. In any case RTB volume would've been in 2024, not much chance then( easy to forget how delayed PVC was, somewhat similar to SPR ).

Yeah, FLAT mode(2T) became default for PVC, composite mode(1T) wasn't much practical. Argonne(updated Jan 2026) gets very low Tile-to Tile(bidirectional) B/W.
All that fancy packaging and then this, just imagine!
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
8,457
11,187
106
Chinese seem to like it, majority of it went to them iirc. Good for video(web/media) for what matters to them. Even the 288 core version of SRF did go to them which wasn't generally available.
yeah but that's still meme volumes vs what Intel aimed for at Meta.
Probably will win in some and lose in others, still could've been better than now it's coming when Venice is around the corner.
yeah it's dead.
LBT ignoring it this last ER call was very indicative, kek.
Graviton 4 was easy for SRF and easier for CWF. CWF would be fine against Graviton 5.
Kind of.
Graviton3/4/5/6/whatever focus on per-core perf.
Socket-level throughput isn't all there is to a server CPU.
Doesn't always matter what AMD does.
of course it does. Intel is very honest about the comp situation.
hence why Coral TTM acceleration.
All the Coral Rapid hype build up and there might be Zen 7 not too distant(timing-wise).
it has to touch venice first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and madtronik

Joe NYC

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2021
4,189
5,755
136
yeah it's dead.
LBT ignoring it this last ER call was very indicative, kek.

The non-response to question about Clearwater Forest was quite telling. Instead of answering, LBT listed what the priorities are (and not including Clearwater Forest in the list of priorities).

of course it does. Intel is very honest about the comp situation.
hence why Coral TTM acceleration.

If Coral was originally scheduled to be on 14A, then either Coral will have to (instead) target 18A or 14A needs some acceleration too. Or at minimum, no delays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and madtronik

regen1

Senior member
Aug 28, 2025
351
432
96
Graviton3/4/5/6/whatever focus on per-core perf.
Socket-level throughput isn't all there is to a server CPU.
Arctic Wolf's 1T perf should be ok. BoM wise lot better vs the humongous mono-dies of P-core. Again DMR-HD shouldn't be as bottlenecked as SRF/CWF wrt fabric in theory. Shouldn't judge Milan(Zen 3) at Rome's(Zen 2) release, necessarily.

of course it does. Intel is very honest about the comp situation.
hence why Coral TTM acceleration.
Nah, there are so many areas in server even aside from various perf parameters. AMD is not everything otherwise according to some GNR(and some previous Xeons) won't have meaningful demand which is very far from reality.
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
8,457
11,187
106
Arctic Wolf's 1T perf should be ok
Yeah but GV5 in particular pushes for per-core perf.
Nah, there are so many areas in server even aside from various perf parameters.
This does not apply to Venice and Venice-E.
May not be directly relevant to this person but seems to be a common feature of this leadership?
no, Intel is just next on the scooping list (every Intel gfx PE+ with "raytracing" in bio is now at AMD). AMD already pillaged ImgTec to the bone.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
23,198
13,286
136
yeah it's dead.
LBT ignoring it this last ER call was very indicative, kek.

That's really quite sad. At least Clearwater Forest was supposed to reach shipping volumes. It was Rogue River Forest that was (effectively) canceled. Now even Clearwater is basically dead.

If Coral was originally scheduled to be on 14A, then either Coral will have to (instead) target 18A or 14A needs some acceleration too. Or at minimum, no delays.
18A-P maybe? It really depends on where Diamond Rapids falls doesn't it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Joe NYC

Joe NYC

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2021
4,189
5,755
136
Death by hybrid bonding.
DMR is much the same.

That's one reason to keep watching for Clearwater Forest launch. If Intel packaging can handle hybrid bond in volume, and on time.

The official reason for the delay was "packaging problem" without specifying what part of packaging, but one would have to suspect hybrid bond.
 

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
5,400
4,819
106
That's really quite sad. At least Clearwater Forest was supposed to reach shipping volumes. It was Rogue River Forest that was (effectively) canceled. Now even Clearwater is basically dead.
Rouge River Forest is not cancelled it's renamed to DMR-HD as for HBI should have tried on a meme volume part that is relatively small.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
23,198
13,286
136
Rouge River Forest is not cancelled it's renamed to DMR-HD

Why? And if Clearwater is effectively dead then why would they bother with Diamond Rapids-HD?

as for HBI should have tried on a meme volume part that is relatively small.

Such as? Where would they fit that into their lineup?

Don't worry about it. Server they weren't alive to begin with.
That has become all the more-evident.