I imagine it would be like Rocket Lake, the 6 big cores are i5 and 8 Big are i7 and i9. How many small cores probably depends on yields and the SKU, the lower power models might have less and the cheapest model is the 6+0. If I had to guess I would say the i5 K would be 6+8.
-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread
Page 362 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I imagine it would be like Rocket Lake, the 6 big cores are i5 and 8 Big are i7 and i9. How many small cores probably depends on yields and the SKU, the lower power models might have less and the cheapest model is the 6+0. If I had to guess I would say the i5 K would be 6+8.
COAk
Junior Member
Well, it is not the OEMs buying the PSUs, but otherwise you have a point for the form factor part
Last edited:
Hulk
Diamond Member
I would postulate that the paradigm shift in which mobile CPU's drive the desktop had already happened. Ice Lake went 10nm and with new architecture (Sunny Cove) before the desktop. Actually we are still waiting on the architecture and the process is on the horizon.
Historically most mobile parts have basically been the bests parts of the wafer with the rest going to the desktop. I don't expect this to change so there is no news here as far as AMD or Intel not "focusing on the desktop." They are focused on performance and efficiency first and foremost and have been for a long time, well since Conroe for Intel anyway. Remember Intel had a rule where they had to achieve a certain increase in IPC (or more) for an equal increase in power? Or something like that, I don't remember it exactly.
As for the global silicon shortage. I have a different take on this. A confluence of events caused it. Everybody working/schooling remotely and a flurry of new technologies everybody "had to have" being two of the primary causes (graphics cards, Zen 3, SSD's, cell phones, etc..). Couple this with manufacturing shutting down for a while and there you have the reason we are where we are now. Supply always catches up with demand. We'll see crazy sales due to over-production soon enough. Whenever there is money to be made there is a knee jerk reaction for production to go through the roof and just like there was a lag catching up with demand, there will be a lag slowing down, which will cause an imbalance in supply.
If OEMs are not the ones buying PSUs that go into OEM machines, who does?
The vast majority of OEM desktops will be made for home/business use, not gaming or encoding. For those relatively moderate uses, six or perhaps even 4 cores will still be more than enough, and performance will be fine with 65 or 95 watt power states enforced.
The thing with silicon wafers, especially the smallest processes, is that the supply is quite fundamentally inelastic. The fab's are so incredibly expensive and take so long to build that there's only quite limited scope to adapt/they basically simply refuse to try and match short term demand spikes.
So we get a temporary supply shortage as opposed to over production/huge subsequent sales.
DrMrLordX
Lifer
Honestly I don't think you understand anything he said.
I do have insides, but I prefer to keep them there instead of sharing.
Anyway, Intel wants to keep x86 as main ISA for everything they can for as long as they can because it restricts the number of competitors and gives them a huge advantage.
What is so difficult for you to understand about this? And his treatment of steam data is clearly with some value, which is clearly against what you stated.
blckgrffn
Diamond Member
This is my take as well - and there is a huge spike in demand for silicon for things like cars and automobiles. There were some articles out there about how nation states (probably including the US) leaned on TSMC and Samsung, I believe, to reallocate wafers very recently to automotive suppliers due to the importance of automobile manufacturing to a nations economy. I don't think this is at all pandemic dependent but rather a new normal that will persist given the increasing number of chips for everything that is needed, from IoT devices on upwards in the value chain. These items have shorter service lives compared to a number of items they are replacing, imo. I expect that either Sony or MS might already be planning their next console bump, for example. Other items like refrigerators and washers and driers are all absorbing tech as well and I can only imagine where this is all headed.
In any case, there are many industries (automotive, aerospace, medical, super computing) that are likely to get backing from on high to get priority for silicon that will exacerbate the production markets inability to meet consumer demand. All it takes is a little blip on the international stage for Taiwan to even be knocked off kilter for a few days/weeks and the crazy supply chain logistics will make it insane. That's a different thread completely but I think it plays into the fact that Intel will be looking for ways to keep 14nm plus infinity hot, adding to their balance sheet and available to them when it is needed.
And the lowest silicon priority of all, I think, are desktop PCs being sold for $300 to $1k. How long will 14nm be available to buy in a new, name brand PC? 2 years? 3? 5? 🙂 (As a CPU, not as a chipset. Even many of those volume chipsets were backported to 22nm recently!)
What makes you think Intel can compete against the many ARM design houses any better than they can compete against AMD? If they went to ARM, they would have much more competition, not less. AMD could just as easily go ARM as well so it's not like they would gain anything by going ARM. Intel will only go ARM if they absolutely have to, not at all by choice.
Would you please just shut up about this stuff. It's pointless bickering. @DrMrLordX - please stop responding. This isn't the graphics sub-forum 😛
DrMrLordX
Lifer
He wants to use Steam data as some bogus juxtaposition and I'm actively telling him not to do so. I know it's not the graphics forum. What else do you want me to do?
Stop responding. There are some things in this world that just cannot be fixed with words.
DrMrLordX
Lifer
Fiiiine.
That should put a fork in all the calls for Intel to divest itself of Altera.
Hmm, are Ice Lake SP and Sapphire Rapids coming at the same time. I mean, we already have a de-lid of Sapphire; I haven't seen one of Ice Lake (then again, I may have missed it).
I'm also super curious about what that FPGA is doing. Is it for special function acceleration or critical CPU/IO functions?
I'm also super curious about what that FPGA is doing. Is it for special function acceleration or critical CPU/IO functions?
Ice Lake Server is shipping now, but who knows about how much volume and if you would even be able to buy one of the higher core count versions. But there's been talk that they will keep it on the market past Sapphire's launch hoping that yields will improve enough that they will be able to sell Icelake in real volume sometime in 2022 while Saphhire is simply the very high end.
Thanks, I sure was out of the loop on that. At least, as @coercitiv noted, Sapphire Rapids look to be a very interesting CPU.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
