IntelUser2000
Elite Member
- Oct 14, 2003
- 8,686
- 3,786
- 136
@beginner99 AMD is also behind on the GPU side. Comparing to ARM vendors they are closer, but Apple's advantages are phenomenal.
Or is it that AMD/Intel's execution has been lacking at best? That's also possible. Intel should have had Golden Cove cores now! The argument that the advantage is due to ISA starts to dissolve when you see that ARM chips have lead in CPU, GPU, and IO.
I'm glad Tigerlake supports LPDDR5, but it merely catches up with them. At one time, they were the one to lead the industry with memory and IO standards.
ARM vendors never fell completely flat on their faces like AMD/Intel did. Sure, they had some less than optimal cores, but it still was faster than previous ones.
Imagine if Bulldozer was a genuine advancement for AMD. Or if Intel delivered 10nm in 2016. They both set themselves back YEARS.
Or is it that AMD/Intel's execution has been lacking at best? That's also possible. Intel should have had Golden Cove cores now! The argument that the advantage is due to ISA starts to dissolve when you see that ARM chips have lead in CPU, GPU, and IO.
I'm glad Tigerlake supports LPDDR5, but it merely catches up with them. At one time, they were the one to lead the industry with memory and IO standards.
on his SQ1 and managed a score about 47% higher in fp throughput versus my old heavily-overclocked A10-7700k. My Snapdragon 855+ got a score that was ~41% faster.
ARM vendors never fell completely flat on their faces like AMD/Intel did. Sure, they had some less than optimal cores, but it still was faster than previous ones.
Imagine if Bulldozer was a genuine advancement for AMD. Or if Intel delivered 10nm in 2016. They both set themselves back YEARS.