Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread

Page 84 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

csbin

Senior member
Feb 4, 2013
838
351
136
Sunnycove is Sunnycove.
Icelake is Icelake.

They shouldn't be the same since.. Sunnycove was developed together with Skylake. I assume Sunnycove core has simply acquired up to Icelake ISA compatibility.

Icelake being based on Skylake-SP. Sunnycove being a new core and having a more optimized FPU for SHA-NI(Goldmont/Cannonlake ISA) and VAES(Icelake ISA).

Sunnycove being a 14-nm part, points toward this being a good thing. *shrug* I have previously talked about Sunnycove being 10-nm, but newer NGC leaks say 14-nm and 7-nm only.

Sunnycove -> No server part
WLcove -> Sapphire Rapids
Oceancove -> Granite Rapids


Sunnycove is Code Name
Ice lake is Architecture Name
 

Bouowmx

Golden Member
Nov 13, 2016
1,138
550
146
"Sunny cove" is name of architecture, processor family, or platform? First time I have heard of the name.

woops. posted this after 'csbin' elaborated.
 

NostaSeronx

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2011
3,686
1,221
136
Sunnycove is Code Name
Ice lake is Architecture Name
"Sunny cove" is name of architecture, processor family, or platform? First time I have heard of the name.
They are both architectural code names for given processors within a set platform.

Icelake becomes Icelake-U, etc. Icelake-U utilizes Icelake cores.
Sunnycove becomes Sunnycove-U, etc. Sunnycove-U utilizes Sunnycove cores.

The cove cores come from an arduously developed new architecture derived from a cancelled Itanium project. Which isn't related to Icelake in anyway other than ISA compatibility.

Sunnycove core => Folsom/SoftMachines(Also, Folsom)
Icelake core => Oregon/Haifa
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: exquisitechar

csbin

Senior member
Feb 4, 2013
838
351
136
They are both architectural code names for given processors within a set platform.

Icelake becomes Icelake-U, etc. Icelake-U utilizes Icelake cores.
Sunnycove becomes Sunnycove-U, etc. Sunnycove-U utilizes Sunnycove cores.

The cove cores come from an arduously developed new architecture derived from a cancelled Itanium project. Which isn't related to Icelake in anyway other than ISA compatibility.

Sunnycove core => Folsom/SoftMachines(Also, Folsom)
Icelake core => Oregon/Haifa


5c1107e978097.jpg
 

csbin

Senior member
Feb 4, 2013
838
351
136
They are both architectural code names for given processors within a set platform.

Icelake becomes Icelake-U, etc. Icelake-U utilizes Icelake cores.
Sunnycove becomes Sunnycove-U, etc. Sunnycove-U utilizes Sunnycove cores.

The cove cores come from an arduously developed new architecture derived from a cancelled Itanium project. Which isn't related to Icelake in anyway other than ISA compatibility.

Sunnycove core => Folsom/SoftMachines(Also, Folsom)
Icelake core => Oregon/Haifa




so


https://www.anandtech.com/show/13699/intel-architecture-day-2018-core-future-hybrid-x86/4


ICLU_575px.jpg
 

NostaSeronx

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2011
3,686
1,221
136
Tejas Nehalem and Core Nehalem scenario. I guess?

https://images.anandtech.com/doci/13699/1-Roadmap.jpg

Sunnycove => Sunny Cove
WLcove => WilLow Cove (biggest mystery solved and this is the huge ultra-wide core)
Oceancove must be after Golden Cove. Which will probably have transistor optimization as Willow Cove.

Sunnycove is in Icelake. Not Icelake is in Sunnycove.

On another side note for the future.. as the cove series progress. More Cluster-based Multithreading architecture tweaks should be apparent.
 
Last edited:

csbin

Senior member
Feb 4, 2013
838
351
136
Tejas Nehalem and Core Nehalem scenario. I guess?

https://images.anandtech.com/doci/13699/1-Roadmap.jpg

Sunnycove => Sunny Cove
WLcove => WilLow Cove (biggest mystery solved and this is the huge ultra-wide core)
Oceancove must be after Golden Cove. Which will probably have transistor optimization as Willow Cove.

Sunnycove is in Icelake. Not Icelake is in Sunnycove.

On another side note for the future.. as the cove series progress. More Cluster-based Multithreading architecture tweaks should be apparent.




https://www.servethehome.com/first-pictures-of-intel-ice-lake-xeon-server-chips/



Intel-Xeon-Roadmap-Architecture-Day-2018.jpg
 
Mar 10, 2006
11,715
2,012
126
They are both architectural code names for given processors within a set platform.

Icelake becomes Icelake-U, etc. Icelake-U utilizes Icelake cores.
Sunnycove becomes Sunnycove-U, etc. Sunnycove-U utilizes Sunnycove cores.

The cove cores come from an arduously developed new architecture derived from a cancelled Itanium project. Which isn't related to Icelake in anyway other than ISA compatibility.

Sunnycove core => Folsom/SoftMachines(Also, Folsom)
Icelake core => Oregon/Haifa

This is all entirely wrong. "Cove" is just the name of the CPU cores, even Cannon Lake's CPU core was a "Cove" and I bet Skylake's core was, too.

Lakes = SoC names.
Coves = Core names.

Every Intel IP has its own code name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phynaz

IntelUser2000

Elite Member
Oct 14, 2003
8,686
3,785
136
This is all entirely wrong. "Cove" is just the name of the CPU cores, even Cannon Lake's CPU core was a "Cove" and I bet Skylake's core was, too.

Nosta should stop believing the visions he's having. Tell them to go away. They don't actually have deep secret infos to tech companies.

He really knows how to tickle your fancy though. I rooted for you Nosta, honest. I wanted you to be right about the post Goldmont Plus cores. But when information keeps being wrong, you have to say enough is enough.

Arachnotronic: What's interesting from the core code-name unveil was that they are going to decouple the core and process in a way.
 
Mar 10, 2006
11,715
2,012
126
Nosta should stop believing the visions he's having. Tell them to go away. They don't actually have deep secret infos to tech companies.

He really knows how to tickle your fancy though. I rooted for you Nosta, honest. I wanted you to be right about the post Goldmont Plus cores. But when information keeps being wrong, you have to say enough is enough.

Arachnotronic: What's interesting from the core code-name unveil was that they are going to decouple the core and process in a way.

Yeah. It's pretty telling that they gave core IP roadmaps and didn't tie them to process technologies. That's the way ARM has been doing it for years and it's high time Intel do the same, if only to be sure to have backup plans in case the original target node isn't ready.
 

IntelUser2000

Elite Member
Oct 14, 2003
8,686
3,785
136
The bad thing about this is that its really all about the future. Nothing saying like "Surprise, our next desktop enthusiast chip may be 14nm, but with this new direction it means it uses Sunny Cove cores".

I'm not excited for Sunny Cove. I like what they go for in Lakefield, and it also being the first to use Foveros. Foveros isn't a mere copy of the chiplet design AMD is pursuing. Actually, these choices take several years.

The interposer is the PCH in Foveros. The next step in integration while keeping the flexibility of MCMs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: happy medium

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
23,587
1,001
126
I’m still very confused about the names.

The next 15 W chips are Ice Lake U and use Sunny Cove? All 10 nm?

What about the Y series?

I read a bit in the AnandTech article about Thunderbolt 3. Is that integrated in Ice Lake? What about Ice Lake Y? It was pretty vague in the article.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
14,610
5,227
136
At this point, I do still expect Icelake U/Y to be lowish volume but wider availability than Cannonlake for sure. I am expecting the volume even in 2020 to be mostly Comet and Whiskey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eug

Yotsugi

Golden Member
Oct 16, 2017
1,029
487
106
At this point, I do still expect Icelake U/Y to be lowish volume but wider availability than Cannonlake for sure. I am expecting the volume even in 2020 to be mostly Comet and Whiskey.
I'd except some decent mobile 10nm volume for H1 2020, but servers and DT, duh.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
14,610
5,227
136
I'd except some decent mobile 10nm volume for H1 2020, but servers and DT, duh.

If that NUC roadmap leak was completely legit, they aren't even doing an Icelake NUC in 2020. Just Comet and Whiskey for Core. Figure the Icelake volume will go to HP and Dell and Lenovo as an option on some laptop models but that's about it.
 

Yotsugi

Golden Member
Oct 16, 2017
1,029
487
106
If that NUC roadmap leak was completely legit, they aren't even doing an Icelake NUC in 2020. Just Comet and Whiskey for Core. Figure the Icelake volume will go to HP and Dell and Lenovo as an option on some laptop models but that's about it.
NUCs kind of live in a different world so guessing Intel's actual roadmap is tricky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arachnotronic

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
23,587
1,001
126
Yes and yes, Sunny Cove is the uArch name, Icelake is the implementation name.

4+2, same as ICL-U, was leaked ages ago.
Ok thx. So Cannon Lake is effectively dead then? Low volume near-demo parts don’t count.

And TB3?
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
14,610
5,227
136
The TB3 would be on the PCH. They would have to increase the bandwidth between the PCH and processor however, but that is doable.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
23,587
1,001
126
Yes and yes, Sunny Cove is the uArch name, Icelake is the implementation name.

4+2, same as ICL-U, was leaked ages ago.
It was never alive to begin with.

No idea.
I think it's still part of the PCH.
The TB3 would be on the PCH. They would have to increase the bandwidth between the PCH and processor however, but that is doable.
So is it reasonable to predict:

Ice Lake Y in 2019 H2, maybe with Thunderbolt 3?
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
23,587
1,001
126
Here’s hoping for that quad Y next year... Mind you I was planning on buying quad 10 nm Y with Thunderbolt in 2016-2017. After Intel’s roadmap collapsed, I bought dual-core Y withhout TB in 2017.

I’ll be keeping my existing dual-core Y laptop at least for a few more years. It turns out TB support hasn’t been a critical issue for me.
 

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,141
2,154
136
Other improvements include a new HEVC Quick Sync Video engine that provides up to a 30% bitrate reduction over Gen9 (at the same or better visual quality)

For the media block, Intel says that the Gen11 design includes a ground up HEVC encoder design, with high quality encode and decode support.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-sunny-cove-gen11-xe-gpu-foveros,5932-3.html
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13699/intel-architecture-day-2018-core-future-hybrid-x86/3


One of the most interesting things for me, a new HEVC encoder with better quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arachnotronic