I can't see twitter right now, can you please post a screenshot? Thanks
It's just a link to this:I can't see twitter right now, can you please post a screenshot? Thanks
2x Genuine Intel(R) CPU 0000%@ (48C 96T 1.5GHz/3.3GHz, 48x 2MB L2, 90MB L3)
Then it's not Sapphire Rapids X as Intel will not produce 2P HEDT processorsIt's just a link to this:
Details for Computer/Device iEi B615 Family
ranker.sisoftware.co.uk
Key bit:
I doubt it.First Review of the 12900KS. Is it enough to rain on the 5800X3D release?
Intel Core i9-12900KS Review - The Best Just Got Better
The Intel Core i9-12900KS is the company's new flagship Alder Lake processor. After our review, we can confirm that it is the "world's fastest gaming CPU," but that comes at a price not only in terms of dollars, but increased power draw and heat output, too.www.techpowerup.com
For the 12900KS, I started with all cores set to the same x49 multiplier for 4.9 GHz all-core and increased the voltage until I got close to the thermal limit of 115°C when running Prime95. Unlike other Alder Lake processors, including the Core i9-12900K, the KS has its out-of-the-box default thermal limit set to 115°C, not 100°C. 115°C is the highest manual setting you can pick in the BIOS for all Alder Lake CPUs. Since this is the default setting, Intel's warranty will cover operating the processor at up to 115°C, which is a good hint for users of other Alder Lake processors based on the same silicon; there's no reason those can't withstand 115°C, too.
In terms of voltage, I settled for 1.35 V and started increasing the multipliers until the system got unstable. Increasing the clocks increased the heat output, so I had to dial down the voltage a little bit—the idea here is to pump as much (or little) voltage into the CPU as the cooling solution can handle as heat. At that voltage, I was able to run at 5.3 GHz almost stable, so I settled for 5.2 GHz all-core for our OC testing. Since 5.2 GHz was rock-stable immediately, there was a little bit of headroom to reduce the voltages further, which brought down power and heat a bit. If you have a high-end custom water-cooler, I'm sure you could easily go to 1.4 V and above to reach 5.4 GHz all-core or more.
This is a significant improvement over the i9-12900K, where I maxed out at 5.0 GHz—seems the new KS is better-binned indeed.
From the TPU review:
This CPU is perfect for Siberia.
I agree with this, it's a Pentium 4 EE releaseIn short, useless and completely unnecessary CPU model.Stretched to the maximum, in an attempt to be better gaming CPU.
- R7 5800X3D hey we offer something different + new/interesting way of CPU L3 Cache packaging
- i9 12900KS, brute force or stretched to the maximum, we have no other options anyway
Intel's top desktop chips after Skylake have been an unbroken chain of Pentium 4 EE releases in all but name.I agree with this, it's a Pentium 4 EE release
To be honest I believe 90% of 12900K can do what the 1900KS are doing, no need for the extra $150 fee,If you want a good bin on a 12900k, there you go. It's like Silicon Lottery but direct from Intel.
I know its an Intel thread, but its not all companies approach. Look at the 5800X3D. It has extra value for the $$$$, not just binned and overclocked from the factory. Intel just has no other way to beat AMD at the moment. The only thing they are king of at the moment, is gaming, and in 18 days that most likely will change.The original, Extreme Edition was a repurposed Xeon MP chip, so no I wouldn't say it's been "EE all along". After the first EE the rest has been just souped up consumer chips.
Sad and wasteful the way companies approach to take the halo spot. It's a wee bit better than 12900K. Actually margin of error differences.
If money were no object, I would buy two. One on the right side of my bed, one on the left. Perfect for keeping me warm on those awfully cold nights. Cheaper solution than two 3090 Ti's.To be honest I believe 90% of 12900K can do what the 1900KS are doing, no need for the extra $150 fee,
If money were no object, I would buy two. One on the right side of my bed, one on the left. Perfect for keeping me warm on those awfully cold nights. Cheaper solution than two 3090 Ti's.
5800X3D sole purpose of existence is to recapture the Gaming Crown from Intel's Hot/Power Hungry/Inefficient grasp. to be honest if I were AMD I would have not bothered since that lead is within single-digit at High Rez gaming(no one buys a 12900K or 5900X to game at 720P those benchmarks are for academic purposes).The actual focus should be on Zen 4and Raptorlake. 10% faster in gaming? Who cares?
Funny you say that, considering RL is rumoured to include a sizeable cache bump, which is supposed to significantly improve gaming performance right? Can't have it both ways. Can't beat AMD with the uber caches? Join em5800X3D sole purpose of existence is to recapture the Gaming Crown from Intel's Hot/Power Hungry/Inefficient grasp. to be honest if I were AMD I would have not bothered since that lead is within single-digit at High Rez gaming(no one buys a 12900K or 5900X to game at 720P those benchmarks are for academic purposes).
RL is a refresh of AL, I would not expect much gaming performance boost.
If the leaks are accurate, Raptor Lake’s L2 cache sizes will increase from 1.25 MB to 2MB for each P core and 2MB to 4MB for each E core cluster. This would mean a total of 32MB of L2 cache for all cores and 36MB L3 cache for all cores. This delivers the grand total number of 68MB.
Funny you say that, considering RL is rumoured to include a sizeable cache bump, which is supposed to significantly improve gaming performance right? Can't have it both ways. Can't beat AMD with the uber caches? Join em