• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread

Page 41 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
IntelUser2000 said:
Cannonlake-Y coming, but in June of 2018.
Click to expand...

So Digitimes was right; since it'd take a month or two to get the chips into laptops and get them into the channel. Perhaps we now looking at maybe Q3 19 for Icelake U/Y and Q1 20 for everything else Icelake. I wonder if Intel is still releasing that 8 core CFL but it won't be released until Jan 19.
 
DrMrLordX said:
Cannonlake-Y was supposed to be shipping right now. Good grief.

So are those the 2+2 chips or what?
Click to expand...

At 5.2W TDP, even with 10nm they can't go beyond 2 core without reducing clocks substantially. If its GT2 graphics, it'll use 40EUs, but again, I don't see the point of having that many resources at 5.2W. Unless 10nm is a surprise in that department and can take full advantage of full 40EUs. That's a stretch.

I see it unlikely we'll see Gen 10. They seem to be keeping things new all for Icelake. Perhaps we'll at least see Gen 10 media like Geminilake?


From Digitimes:
Some vendors are even considering skipping Cannon Lake to wait for the release of its successor, the Ice Lake CPUs, which according to Intel's roadmap, should be available shortly after the specific processors' rescheduled launch, the sources said.
Click to expand...

This is what I mean with Whiskeylake. If Icelake is coming early Spring, manufacturers will skip Whiskeylake. Either that, or Icelake is more towards H2.

I wonder if Intel is still releasing that 8 core CFL but it won't be released until Jan 19.
Click to expand...

This is why I think 8 core Coffeelake exists, despite their roadmaps to the contrary. Icelake will not be ready this year. For competitive reasons they need to get 8 core Coffeelake by end of 2018. The problem is they'll be squeezing two more cores on the same 14nm++ process.

Imaginary 3.5 year process lead is now zero.
 
Last edited:
Bondrewd said:
AMD will skin them alive for that.
It's suicide.
Click to expand...

You are being dramatic.

In the days of Pentium III, the Athlon came out, and the downhill started for Intel. What no one realized was that their solution turned out to be none other than Netburst architecture. That, was their real mistake.

Will their Netburst of this generation turn out to be Skylake-based architectures and 10nm? Or will it start with Sapphire Rapid?
 
IntelUser2000 said:
You are being dramatic.

In the days of Pentium III, the Athlon came out, and the downhill started for Intel. What no one realized was that their solution turned out to be none other than Netburst architecture. That, was their real mistake.

Will their Netburst of this generation turn out to be Skylake-based architectures and 10nm? Or will it start with Sapphire Rapid?
Click to expand...
Redacted, it's not about something being bad, it's about the thing being late.

No profanity in the tech forums.

AT Mod Usandthem
 
You seem to have an axe to grind based on your comments. Unlike on 1 on 1 conversations, use of profanity on posts suggest there's a significant amount of anger behind it.
 
IntelUser2000 said:
You are being dramatic.

In the days of Pentium III, the Athlon came out, and the downhill started for Intel. What no one realized was that their solution turned out to be none other than Netburst architecture. That, was their real mistake.

Will their Netburst of this generation turn out to be Skylake-based architectures and 10nm? Or will it start with Sapphire Rapid?
Click to expand...

He might be dramatic but reality for Intel could be far worse. I think Intel has a few very tough years ahead. How they respond to the challenges will redefine themselves and their future as a IDM. I think AMD is going to take significant market share starting in 2018 in all segments - DT/NB/server . 2019 is when the screws will get turned on Intel as AMD has for the first time in a very long time access to a process node which is very competitive with Intel 10nm.
 
formulav8 said:
About time if he is leaving. He looks to be as bad as Hector Ruinz.
Click to expand...

imo BK is worse than Hector Ruiz. He will go down in history as the CEO who presided over the downfall of Intel as an IDM and a semiconductor manufacturing leader. Intel is going to go through a few very tough years before there is any hope of a turnaround.
 
IMG_20171219_060333.jpg

TigerLake has been added to Intel's website
 
IntelUser2000 said:
In the days of Pentium III, the Athlon came out, and the downhill started for Intel. What no one realized was that their solution turned out to be none other than Netburst architecture. That, was their real mistake.

Will their Netburst of this generation turn out to be Skylake-based architectures and 10nm? Or will it start with Sapphire Rapid?
Click to expand...

With the Pentium III, Intel couldn't figure out how to up clockspeeds. Took em awhile (Tualatin, Banias, Dothan, Yonah, Conroe, etc) to get back to it. I don't know that we'll see another Pentium III/Netburst moment. Besides, Sapphire Rapids may never make it to the desktop.

formulav8 said:
About time if he is leaving. He looks to be as bad as Hector Ruinz.
Click to expand...

Maybe he'll try to spin off the fabs and take them along for the ride!
 
DrMrLordX said:
Besides, Sapphire Rapids may never make it to the desktop.
Click to expand...

There was a German(not sure) site I gave a link to in one of these threads that showed Sapphire Rapid coming for client, just later than for Server.

With the Pentium III, Intel couldn't figure out how to up clockspeeds. Took em awhile (Tualatin, Banias, Dothan, Yonah, Conroe, etc) to get back to it.
Click to expand...

It's not exactly the same of course. But that's how a repeat in history goes. Different actors, different backgrounds, but the struggles are similar. Technologies, actors change, but core human behavior stays the same.

With the problem they had back then, it is interesting to notice how they turned being unable to increase clocks by going all-in on a chip that was purely for clock speeds, which ended up in failing the goal anyway. The engineers, and managers despite their smarts and qualifications failed to see mere 5 years ahead.
 
raghu78 said:
Got to cash those shares before it becomes a lot less valuable. I think by Q3 2018 it will be obvious which direction their stock is headed. Down, down and down.
Click to expand...

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/19/intel-ceo-in-memo-we-are-going-to-take-more-risks.html

Intel CEO to employees: 'We are going to take more risks'
  • Intel's Brian Krzanich wrote in a memo to employees on Tuesday that the company faces "an exciting challenge" in areas where it's an underdog.

I assume by 'we' he means the employees. After selling the maximum amount of stock legally possible his risk profile is looking decidedly smaller at the moment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top