So the consensus is that it won't play Crysis?
Bummer.
So the consensus is that it won't play Crysis?
Bummer.
Could be a good sign if he was in the meeting to explain everything they did wrong last time...Not a good sign...
http://www.hexus.net/tech/news/industry/119417-larrabee-architect-tom-forsyth-returns-intel/
Via his personal Twitter account yesterday, Tom Forsyth announced that "I start at Intel shortly as a chip architect in Raja Koduri's group".
Intel needs new management and corporate culture revamp before it can attract the type of talent that will make it competitive.
And... speaking of the devil:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/21/int...-down-bob-swan-to-step-in-as-interim-ceo.html
Intel's Brian Krzanich forced out as CEO after 'consensual relationship' with employee
Fixed the title of the thread
He wasn't the EX-CEO when he confirmed it, so it's now inaccurate.Fixed the title of the thread
You have a point.He wasn't the EX-CEO when he confirmed it, so it's now inaccurate.
Semiaccurate.He wasn't the EX-CEO when he confirmed it, so it's now inaccurate.
Even if they get the hardware done right, and thats a huge if. They have shown absolutely no signs of ever putting in the effort into drivers to actually get any of their hardware to work with most games. Intel by a huge margin has the worst drivers of any IGP/Discreet GPU maker.
So who cares, you wont be able to play games on it anyways even if in theory the hardware is good enough.
IIRC, Intel has been talking about adaptive sync for a while, so I expect we will see it.As others have said software will be an issue and I don't only mean drivers. We can all agree that this is also a push into compute, graphics unrelated. Well the compute market is dominated by nvidia and cuda. If you look around most software that supports some form of gpgpu requires cuda and hence an nv gpu. So like AMDs HIP intel would need to provide a cross-compiler from cuda to whatever they will use and we see how well that has been working fro AMD so far (not very well).
With drivers i see the issue in added features like adaptivesync / gsync and such. It's one thing to "underperform" but if you also lack important features even a low price might not be enough to sell the product.
EDIT;
And current Intel iGPUs aren't very efficient space and power wise so just reusing it and scaling up will not work without some serious redesign.
Does it bother anyone else that Raja wears his glasses crooked on his face?
You are not wrong, but how much effort should they put, since the bulk of their igpus run like crap anyway?
I mean if Youtube and Facebook work, the drivers are fine.
I'm pretty sure if the hardware gets up to par, the drivers will too.
i740 was 20 years ago.
Larrabee is a more recent effort.
Well Intel does have the resources to produce a decent dGPU with good drivers but it just a matter of willingness to take the effort and commit those resources to do so.You's think that, but the I740 was a total disaster. I dont forsee them doing any better than that this time around.