it was at roughly around ~30W for the whole package with a max of 37W
DigDog
Lifer
- Jun 3, 2011
- 14,582
- 2,974
- 136
DigDog
Lifer
- Jun 3, 2011
- 14,582
- 2,974
- 136
a word of advice; i am convinced that these last drivers changed my mouse settings. How, i have no idea - although this driver package does say it includes other firmware updates, i think for HDMI. I cannot find any corroborating evidence online, but two games i play regularly felt very much off in the aiming speed, and i had to turn down the sensitivity settings on both.
my mouse itself is driverless and it's not a hardware issue.
my mouse itself is driverless and it's not a hardware issue.
Maybe they reduced the latency? Or the driver control panel contains some input latency setting that is on by default?
DigDog
Lifer
- Jun 3, 2011
- 14,582
- 2,974
- 136
.. why would W11 add artificial latency to my mouse?
i admit i haven't messed with my mouse settings since i stopped playing Quake, but i wouldn't expect that a video driver change things dramatically in a videgame. i know this sound stupid - but why would the mouse be tied to anything a video driver can change? this isn't the 90s anymore, it's not like stuff like "mouse speed tied to FPS" still happens.
Well if the mouse cursor is rendered by the GPU than it makes sense
Is Low Latency mode enabled in your Intel Graphics control panel? Try turning it off.
DigDog
Lifer
- Jun 3, 2011
- 14,582
- 2,974
- 136
1. i do not have installed the Intel control panel; i only have the driver, and the new (from previous drivers) OneAPI Level Zero. I think the name already tells you what this does.
2. i may be wrong, but i don't think mouse speed is any more tied to frame rate, on desktop or in an application. If for some reason you were getting such a bad framerate that you mouse wouldn't render, it would skip, but the computer would still keep track of the location based on the info from the sensor.
oh and if i had a low latency mode, i would want it on. i'm not a XxX*1337*Sh0tz!360 gamer anymore but i'd still prefer to have my mouse input raw.
2. i may be wrong, but i don't think mouse speed is any more tied to frame rate, on desktop or in an application. If for some reason you were getting such a bad framerate that you mouse wouldn't render, it would skip, but the computer would still keep track of the location based on the info from the sensor.
oh and if i had a low latency mode, i would want it on. i'm not a XxX*1337*Sh0tz!360 gamer anymore but i'd still prefer to have my mouse input raw.
So suppose the previous default was keeping LLM off and in this driver they switched it on by default so you noticed the difference. My theory.
DigDog
Lifer
- Jun 3, 2011
- 14,582
- 2,974
- 136
Likely no; remember that i recently had a RX590, moved (with some embarrassing failures) to the B580, then to W11, all without needing to change the mouse settings.
There is something inside this driver that made it change. I understand you too now have a Intel card, a A770? which means you'll use it too, see if you too notice any changes.
Yeah but I use it in LM Studio. Haven't been able to play a PC game in ages. Such is life
GodisanAtheist
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2006
- 8,265
- 9,618
- 136
Honestly though, would an Arc cancellation surprise anyone at this point given Intel's history and it's current "we over diversified and need to get back to basics" CEO at the helm?
TBF Arc is likely a rounding error on Intel's financials so easier to pass over by the bean counters.
TBF Arc is likely a rounding error on Intel's financials so easier to pass over by the bean counters.
if they want inference they need dGPU or chungus SoC
Hoping even if it's a cancellation that it's more a hibernation in disguise while they focus on the Pro market.
sure but i am unable to tipe directly in the forum 🤣. i have to write in somewhere else and copy paste here
- Aug 22, 2001
- 31,981
- 32,401
- 146
Lots of posts on the ARC reddit saying BF6 is nerfed on A and B series. 12900K+A750 = 100% CPU usage 👀
@igor_kavinski couldn't find the setting it says on select models so maybe mine is not included
I was playing Tom Clancy's Division 1 on my U9 185H on my Arc iGPU
Settings
Don't mind the RTX 4060 CapFrameX is showing it as the GPU Name but it was running on my arc iGPU
Settings
Don't mind the RTX 4060 CapFrameX is showing it as the GPU Name but it was running on my arc iGPU
coercitiv
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2014
- 7,345
- 17,389
- 136
"For personal computing, Intel will build and offer to the market x86 system-on-chips (SOCs) that integrate NVIDIA RTX GPU chiplets. These new x86 RTX SOCs will power a wide range of PCs that demand integration of world-class CPUs and GPUs."
Not looking good for Arc.
- Aug 22, 2001
- 31,981
- 32,401
- 146
Hopefully this is the MediaTek equivalent for x86. And ARC dGPU will continue. We are drawing ever closer to the "Now all restaurants are Taco Bell"
I was pleasantly surprised how well that game ran on the A380.
It's a very nice game especially the graphics still holds up today
That's very suspicious. It's like LBT asked them to buy enough stock to cover their R&D for Intel ARC!
Would make perfect sense since I bought four Intel ARCs
$5 billion is simply a drop in the bucket for Nvidia. Just a necessary expense to kill off rival silicon.
Optimistically speaking though, it could be LBT signalling to the Intel ARC team to not mess up and deliver their very best.
TRENDING THREADS
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 246
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
Facebook
Twitter