igor_kavinski
Lifer
- Jul 27, 2020
- 26,331
- 18,108
- 146
it was at roughly around ~30W for the whole package with a max of 37WLooks very decent.
Maybe they reduced the latency? Or the driver control panel contains some input latency setting that is on by default?but two games i play regularly felt very much off in the aiming speed, and i had to turn down the sensitivity settings on both.
.. why would W11 add artificial latency to my mouse?Maybe they reduced the latency? Or the driver control panel contains some input latency setting that is on by default?
Well if the mouse cursor is rendered by the GPU than it makes sense.. why would W11 add artificial latency to my mouse?
i admit i haven't messed with my mouse settings since i stopped playing Quake, but i wouldn't expect that a video driver change things dramatically in a videgame. i know this sound stupid - but why would the mouse be tied to anything a video driver can change? this isn't the 90s anymore, it's not like stuff like "mouse speed tied to FPS" still happens.
Is Low Latency mode enabled in your Intel Graphics control panel? Try turning it off... why would W11 add artificial latency to my mouse?
So suppose the previous default was keeping LLM off and in this driver they switched it on by default so you noticed the difference. My theory.1. i do not have installed the Intel control panel; i only have the driver
Likely no; remember that i recently had a RX590, moved (with some embarrassing failures) to the B580, then to W11, all without needing to change the mouse settings.So suppose the previous default was keeping LLM off and in this driver they switched it on by default so you noticed the difference. My theory.
Yeah but I use it in LM Studio. Haven't been able to play a PC game in ages. Such is lifeI understand you too now have a Intel card, a A770? which means you'll use it too, see if you too notice any changes.
To be honest, I'm in the same situation...Yeah but I use it in LM Studio. Haven't been able to play a PC game in ages. Such is life![]()
that guy is saying so much about arc getting cancelled that's not true tbh they are going to make dGPUs and keep improving their IP but i don't know what will be the biggest fattest GPU will they makeARC has said it was canceled and persistently said like a broken clock...
A man who says Exsit50...
That person only says that ARC has been canceled, and he doesn't say anything in detail, so it's suspicious. If I had to say it, I would only say speculation.that guy is saying so much about arc getting cancelled that's not true tbh they are going to make dGPUs and keep improving their IP but i don't know what will be the biggest fattest GPU will they make
In terms of persistence, it's more than IntelThat person only says that ARC has been canceled, and he doesn't say anything in detail, so it's suspicious. If I had to say it, I would only say speculation.
In such a state, I can't tell you to believe what Leeker is saying. This is arrogant
if they want inference they need dGPU or chungus SoCHonestly though, would an Arc cancellation surprise anyone at this point given Intel's history and it's current "we over diversified and need to get back to basics" CEO at the helm?
TBF Arc is likely a rounding error on Intel's financials so easier to pass over by the bean counters.
Why do you throw away the GPU to do AI?Honestly though, would an Arc cancellation surprise anyone at this point given Intel's history and it's current "we over diversified and need to get back to basics" CEO at the helm?
TBF Arc is likely a rounding error on Intel's financials so easier to pass over by the bean counters.