Originally posted by: Jeff7
Too bad you can't just get a nice thermal imaging camera and have a look at your house. That'd show you right straight away where your heat is being lost. I wonder if a local insulation business might have one that they use for consultation purposes?
I guess I'd just like to test it for myself; the site isn't technical enough for my taste.
But a thin insulator doesn't offer much resistance - if you've ever felt a single-pane glass window on a cold day, you'd know what I mean. Glass is about 10x more conductive than this stuff though; it still is considered an insulating ceramic, at least when compared to other engineering materials.
Heat Transfer = (k * A * ?T) / L
k = thermal conductivity
A = exposed area
?T = temperature differential between the outer and inner surfaces
L = thickness of the material
So as the thickness goes down, the heat transferred increases, as you might expect. And a layer of paint is going to be pretty thin.
On the other hand, this stuff is marketed as being cheap. And increase that A term, and your heat transfer is going to be large; if you can lower the k value over a large area, it could result in a significant reduction in heat transferred.
Frankly, I don't feel like setting up a spreadsheet right now to run some numbers to see just how much it would reduce heat loss.
I'd say that a thermal camera would be an easier method to see where you're losing heat.
I'm not at all familiar with stucco houses. Are the walls hollow? Some insulation places have this expanding foam stuff that they can inject into walls.