- Sep 18, 2002
- 13,990
- 1
- 0
... why don't employers reduce hours? Unemployment is 5%? I don't think anyone would mind working 5% less in exchange for full employment.
Originally posted by: Toasthead
you are assuming that all unemployed people WANT TO work. You are also assuming that all unemployed people share the same skill set. There are LOTS of unemployed people who have little to no skills and would be unable to do a lot of jobs.
also employees cost companies a lot of money. Having 100 95% time workers would cost a company a lot more than having 95 100% workers.
Originally posted by: Toasthead
you are assuming that all unemployed people WANT TO work. You are also assuming that all unemployed people share the same skill set. There are LOTS of unemployed people who have little to no skills and would be unable to do a lot of jobs.
also employees cost companies a lot of money. Having 100 95% time workers would cost a company a lot more than having 95 100% workers.
Huh? Do the frenchies still go to work at all?France already tried this and unemployment went up.
99.99999999999999% of the population could not care less what the unemployment rate is as long as they have a job.Originally posted by: Jellomancer
... why don't employers reduce hours? Unemployment is 5%? I don't think anyone would mind working 5% less in exchange for full employment.
Originally posted by: Dudd
Originally posted by: Toasthead
you are assuming that all unemployed people WANT TO work. You are also assuming that all unemployed people share the same skill set. There are LOTS of unemployed people who have little to no skills and would be unable to do a lot of jobs.
also employees cost companies a lot of money. Having 100 95% time workers would cost a company a lot more than having 95 100% workers.
The official 5% unemployment rate does not include people that don't want to work. They are considered out of the work force. The only people that are counted in offical government data are those people actively looking for a job, those that are sending out resumes, going to interviews, etc.
Originally posted by: tm37
Originally posted by: Dudd
Originally posted by: Toasthead
you are assuming that all unemployed people WANT TO work. You are also assuming that all unemployed people share the same skill set. There are LOTS of unemployed people who have little to no skills and would be unable to do a lot of jobs.
also employees cost companies a lot of money. Having 100 95% time workers would cost a company a lot more than having 95 100% workers.
The official 5% unemployment rate does not include people that don't want to work. They are considered out of the work force. The only people that are counted in offical government data are those people actively looking for a job, those that are sending out resumes, going to interviews, etc.
HAHAHAHA That is the funniest thing I have ever read![]()
Families still care. In the olden days and still today if a family member experiences economic turbulence another member helps out. And of course charites were plentiful then.Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Americans have created a dog eat dog world that's turned everybody into dogs. Dogs worry about their share, not the welfare of the next guy. Any softness could be fatal. Unemploynent can be ended overnight by executing people who aren't working.
Now you've touched onto another topic alltogether, I think community support is better because people feel responsible for the money or food or whatever that they take from others. Now the government just steals from me and the rest of you who work and give it to the lazy who cant manage to take care of themselves. Damn socialists :|Originally posted by: JellyBaby
Families still care. In the olden days and still today if a family member experiences economic turbulence another member helps out. And of course charites were plentiful then.Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Americans have created a dog eat dog world that's turned everybody into dogs. Dogs worry about their share, not the welfare of the next guy. Any softness could be fatal. Unemploynent can be ended overnight by executing people who aren't working.
Today you hold out your hand to the government. Now I'm not against this if it's reasonable and up to the States but the Olden Wayes brings people together and, I think, more effectively get the jobless out of depression/worry and back on track. Think Little House on the Prairie. If Albert was in dire straights Charles Ingals was always there and the ending was happy!
But healthy nuclear families and private charities are ever shrinking. Promoting either ones does not get you elected.
Originally posted by: tm37
Originally posted by: Dudd
Originally posted by: Toasthead
you are assuming that all unemployed people WANT TO work. You are also assuming that all unemployed people share the same skill set. There are LOTS of unemployed people who have little to no skills and would be unable to do a lot of jobs.
also employees cost companies a lot of money. Having 100 95% time workers would cost a company a lot more than having 95 100% workers.
The official 5% unemployment rate does not include people that don't want to work. They are considered out of the work force. The only people that are counted in offical government data are those people actively looking for a job, those that are sending out resumes, going to interviews, etc.
HAHAHAHA That is the funniest thing I have ever read![]()
