Individual Jihads

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
I noticed the first two Utah/shooter threads were locked. I don't know why- hopefully this is an issue that can be openly discussed.

The FBI (law enforcement with Intelligence abilities, so to speak ;)), are the ones that have excluded ties to terrorism in the Utah situation. Pretty much what I figured.

BUT...

In October 2006, a pro-jihad internet site published a "Guide for Individual Jihad" explaining to jihadists "how to fight alone." It recommended, among other things, assassination with guns, mass public shootings, and running people over.

Talovic joins an unfortunately growing list of Muslims who have committed random acts of violence, only for officials to assure us that their actions have nothing to do with terrorism. Maybe none of them do, but the list is full of troubling details:

**On January 31, Ismail Yassin Mohamed, 22, stole a car in Minneapolis. He went on a rampage, ramming the stolen car into other cars and then stealing a van and continuing to ram other cars, injuring one person. His father told officials that Mohamed was suffering from mental problems; his mother added he had been depressed and hadn't been taking his medication. During his rampage, Mohamed repeatedly yelled, "Die, die, die, kill, kill, kill," and when asked why he did all this, he replied, "Allah made me do it."**

another incident
another incident
another incident
link
link

None of these were terrorist attacks in the sense that they were planned and executed by organized terrorist agents. And it is possible that all of them were products of nothing more ideologically significant than a disturbed mental state, although it is at least noteworthy that each attacker explained his actions in terms of Islamic terrorism. (Like many crazed Christian-inspired killing that have happened "Did it for God" type stuff)

Is it possible that Sulejmen Talovic and some of these others were waging this jihad of one? It is indeed, but with law enforcement officials trained only to look for signs of membership in al-Qaeda or other jihad groups, and to discount terrorism as a factor if those signs aren't there, it is a possibility that investigators will continue to overlook.

Did Sulejmen Talovic have Al-Hakaymah's "Guide for Individual Jihad" on his hard drive or elsewhere in his possessions. Probably not. But it is something to be aware of, and good police work means looking at all the possibilities.

If such attacks grow in number, it would behoove authorities at very least to consider the possibility that these attacks were inspired by the jihadist ideology of Islamic supremacism, and to step up pressure on American Muslim advocacy groups to renounce that ideology definitively and begin extensive programs to teach against it in American Islamic schools and mosques.

---

~~~ NOTICE ~~~

The previous two threads the op referred to were bigoted anti-Islamic rants. This thread will remain unlocked as long as the discussion remains on topic without similar bigotry.

We will be monitoring this thread. If you post bigoted flames, expect to be posting eleswhere for a length of time proportional to the gravity of the offense.

AnandTech Moderator
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.

The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

Allah means God. It doesn't mean a Muslim God.
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Let me get this straight, if this guy was a Christian and got his information on the web, this would be a law enforcement problem. But since he's a Muslim and got his information on the web, it'sm now part of the "Global War on Terror"?

Am I missing something here or are your assertions pure lunacy? Stop with the conspiracies, your head might explode.
 

catnap1972

Platinum Member
Aug 10, 2000
2,607
0
76
Originally posted by: Narmer
Let me get this straight, if this guy was a Christian and got his information on the web, this would be a law enforcement problem. But since he's a Muslim and got his information on the web, it'sm now part of the "Global War on Terror"?

You pretty well hit it--the Christian would just need a little "penance" (couple'a Hail Mary's oughta do it) while the Muslim would need his country blown to bits to teach him a lesson.

 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Aimster
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

Allah means God. It doesn't mean a Muslim God.
ummm, did you even read the OP? The OP accounts for all of those possibilities.
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
on another note, since when did modern Islamic terrorists start targeting a certain religion? Their entire modus operandi fails to take the religion of their victims into account. Therefore, although it's very unlikely, the Utah attack still does fit the profile of a modern Islamic terrorist attack.

The location of the attack, the citizenship of the victims, and the symbolic nature of each of those factors, are much more important to terrorists than the religion or beliefs of the individual victims.
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Aimster
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

Allah means God. It doesn't mean a Muslim God.
ummm, did you even read the OP? The OP accounts for all of those possibilities.
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
on another note, since when did modern Islamic terrorists start targeting a certain religion? Their entire modus operandi fails to take the religion of their victims into account. Therefore, although it's very unlikely, the Utah attack still does fit the profile of a modern Islamic terrorist attack.

The location of the attack, the citizenship of the victims, and the symbolic nature of each of those factors, are much more important to terrorists than the religion or beliefs of the individual victims.

Tell me, what would you call a modern Christian terrorist? What's the f*****g difference? Do you send the military to fight one but law enforcement to fight another?
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Narmer
Let me get this straight, if this guy was a Christian and got his information on the web, this would be a law enforcement problem. But since he's a Muslim and got his information on the web, it'sm now part of the "Global War on Terror"?
It all depends on the motivation of the perpetrator himself.

I also think the OP made it very clear that he simply wants to discuss the possibility of these "individual jihads;" and is in no way claiming that these attacks were definitely a part of the GWOT. He left the possibilities up to you, the reader, to encourage discussion.
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Aimster
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

Allah means God. It doesn't mean a Muslim God.
ummm, did you even read the OP? The OP accounts for all of those possibilities.
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
on another note, since when did modern Islamic terrorists start targeting a certain religion? Their entire modus operandi fails to take the religion of their victims into account. Therefore, although it's very unlikely, the Utah attack still does fit the profile of a modern Islamic terrorist attack.

The location of the attack, the citizenship of the victims, and the symbolic nature of each of those factors, are much more important to terrorists than the religion or beliefs of the individual victims.

I laugh at your entire post.
As usual.

Modern Islam is peaceful. Show me 1% of the Muslim population that is violent. What is your biggest example Iraq? That is what a civil war is. People killing the other side.

I can show you numerous accounts of Christians doing "terrorist" acts against Muslims, yet they are somehow ignored as terrorist.

Why? The west labels the terrorists.

The Utah attack doesn't fit the profile of anything other than a random act of violence. Do you not read the newspaper? Obviously not. All you read is your local gun magazine.
 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
Originally posted by: Aimster
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

I don't know why he did it. Probably simply screwed in the head. Just like most cases of a Muslim going on a violence spree, or anyone doing a mass killing. Accept the nut in Seattle who attacked the Jewish center killing several... he was definitely on a personal jihad of some sort.

My main point is, there is this idea of "individual jihad" and it may come into play. Just something people, especially law enforcement, should probably be aware of.
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Narmer
Let me get this straight, if this guy was a Christian and got his information on the web, this would be a law enforcement problem. But since he's a Muslim and got his information on the web, it'sm now part of the "Global War on Terror"?
It all depends on the motivation of the perpetrator himself.

I also think the OP made it very clear that he simply wants to discuss the possibility of these "individual jihads;" and is in no way claiming that these attacks were definitely a part of the GWOT. He left the possibilities up to you, the reader, to encourage discussion.

Tell me, in what way does it depends? If there was an IRA agent that killed Protestants in Utah, would that be a part of the Global War on Terror? If he's a Muslim and went to Pakistan, would that be part of the Global War on Terror? If so, who is the head of this war on terror? What is the global war on terror?
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Aimster
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

I don't know why he did it. Probably simply screwed in the head. Just like most cases of a Muslim going on a violence spree, or anyone doing a mass killing. Accept the nut in Seattle who attacked the Jewish center killing several... he was definitely on a personal jihad of some sort.

My main point is, there is this idea of "individual jihad" and it may come into play. Just something people, especially law enforcement, should probably be aware of.

Jihad does not mean going around killing people.
It especially does not mean going around killing civilians.

Anyone who falls into the category in which you are describing has never read the Quran in their life. Thus making them not a Muslim.

 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Aimster
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

Allah means God. It doesn't mean a Muslim God.
ummm, did you even read the OP? The OP accounts for all of those possibilities.
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
on another note, since when did modern Islamic terrorists start targeting a certain religion? Their entire modus operandi fails to take the religion of their victims into account. Therefore, although it's very unlikely, the Utah attack still does fit the profile of a modern Islamic terrorist attack.

The location of the attack, the citizenship of the victims, and the symbolic nature of each of those factors, are much more important to terrorists than the religion or beliefs of the individual victims.

Tell me, what would you call a modern Christian terrorist? What's the f*****g difference? Do you send the military to fight one but law enforcement to fight another?
It all depends on their location. Law enforcement takes care of terrorists and terrorist incidents located on US soil, while the military may be used to take care of terrorists on foreign soil.

Now, what would I call a "modern Christian terrorist"? I would call them exactly that. The IRA comes to mind... One could describe them as a group of modern Christian terrorists. What was your point?
 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
Originally posted by: Narmer
Let me get this straight, if this guy was a Christian and got his information on the web, this would be a law enforcement problem. But since he's a Muslim and got his information on the web, it'sm now part of the "Global War on Terror"?

Am I missing something here or are your assertions pure lunacy? Stop with the conspiracies, your head might explode.

Assertions? Who said anything about GWOT? Actually, I specifically mentioned law enforcement several times. Perhaps your head has already exploded?

Maybe it's an issue, maybe it isn't. But if some concept like "individual jihad" spreads and we see more of it, we have to deal with it minus the PC blinders. Possible solution? Read my last paragraph again.
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Aimster
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

Allah means God. It doesn't mean a Muslim God.
ummm, did you even read the OP? The OP accounts for all of those possibilities.
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
on another note, since when did modern Islamic terrorists start targeting a certain religion? Their entire modus operandi fails to take the religion of their victims into account. Therefore, although it's very unlikely, the Utah attack still does fit the profile of a modern Islamic terrorist attack.

The location of the attack, the citizenship of the victims, and the symbolic nature of each of those factors, are much more important to terrorists than the religion or beliefs of the individual victims.

Tell me, what would you call a modern Christian terrorist? What's the f*****g difference? Do you send the military to fight one but law enforcement to fight another?
It all depends on their location. Law enforcement takes care of terrorists and terrorist incidents located on US soil, while the military may be used to take care of terrorists on foreign soil.

Now, what would I call a "modern Christian terrorist"? I would call them exactly that. The IRA comes to mind... One could describe them as a group of modern Christian terrorists. What was your point?

Would the IRA be a part of the Global War on Terror?
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
Global War on Terror is a B.S title.

If you want to stop global terror, start with it right here at home with the history of the U.S.A.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Aimster
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

Allah means God. It doesn't mean a Muslim God.
ummm, did you even read the OP? The OP accounts for all of those possibilities.
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
on another note, since when did modern Islamic terrorists start targeting a certain religion? Their entire modus operandi fails to take the religion of their victims into account. Therefore, although it's very unlikely, the Utah attack still does fit the profile of a modern Islamic terrorist attack.

The location of the attack, the citizenship of the victims, and the symbolic nature of each of those factors, are much more important to terrorists than the religion or beliefs of the individual victims.

I laugh at your entire post.
As usual.

Modern Islam is peaceful. Show me 1% of the Muslim population that is violent. What is your biggest example Iraq? That is what a civil war is. People killing the other side.

I can show you numerous accounts of Christians doing "terrorist" acts against Muslims, yet they are somehow ignored as terrorist.

Why? The west labels the terrorists.

The Utah attack doesn't fit the profile of anything other than a random act of violence. Do you not read the newspaper? Obviously not. All you read is your local gun magazine.
1) I've been on your side for quite some time in trying to educate people on Islam. I agree that the fanatical segments of Islam are a very small portion of the whole. So where the hell do you get off claiming I've stated otherwise?

2) There are certainly Christian terrorists in the world - I would never deny that.

3) Trust me, the intelligence and law enforcement agencies responsible for your safety are not ignoring ANY terrorist group, regardless of their religion. The honest truth, however, is that the current Islamic terrorist threat to the USA is much larger than the Christian terrorist threat to the US. That's just a fact you cannot argue with. That does not mean that we are not actively pursuing other non-Muslim terrorist groups; because we most certainly are!

4) I do not believe the Utah attack had anything to do with Islam or terrorism. I agree with you that it was most likely an act of random violence. However, you are wrong to say that it does not fit the profile of an Islamic terrorist attack simply because the kid was white, and that he did not know the religion of the targets. That was the point of my previous response. In fact, his attack does fit a large number of the usual attributes of a modern Islamic terrorist attack. But, once again, I do not think that is what happened.

Aimster, please read my entire post before responding. If you are literate, you'll see that I am not disagreeing with you on much, and I'm certainly not guilty of any of the accusations you made about me in your last post. Just take the time to read and understand what I wrote...
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,843
10,148
136
Originally posted by: cwjerome
If such attacks grow in number, it would behoove authorities at very least to consider the possibility that these attacks were inspired by the jihadist ideology of Islamic supremacism, and to step up pressure on American Muslim advocacy groups to renounce that ideology definitively and begin extensive programs to teach against it in American Islamic schools and mosques.

Moderates like Jamal Miftah who was banished from his Mosque for denouncing Al'Qaeda? They denounced him instead, in a manner which indicates they?ll go to heaven for killing Jamal.

Perhaps moderates don?t speak out because they value their own lives.

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Aimster
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

I don't know why he did it. Probably simply screwed in the head. Just like most cases of a Muslim going on a violence spree, or anyone doing a mass killing. Accept the nut in Seattle who attacked the Jewish center killing several... he was definitely on a personal jihad of some sort.

My main point is, there is this idea of "individual jihad" and it may come into play. Just something people, especially law enforcement, should probably be aware of.

Jihad does not mean going around killing people.
It especially does not mean going around killing civilians.

Anyone who falls into the category in which you are describing has never read the Quran in their life. Thus making them not a Muslim.
Aimster > you are preaching to the choir here. Both Jerome and myself know the difference between a normal good Muslim person and the deranged lunatics who twist Islam to suit their violent purposes. We know... We get it. So stop assuming we don't know the difference!

We also know the definition of "Jihad" as it is understood by 99.9% of the Muslims on the planet... we know it simply means "struggle."

That said, what you never ever want to admit is that there are thousands of Muslims falling victim to those who would twist that word to suit their own violent purposes. It is that group of Muslims who we are waging the GWOT against... NOT the general Muslim population.

Every time I read one of your posts, I feel like I'm debating the issue with a teenager who just learned English... a very passionate teenager, but a juvenile nonetheless. You tend to see what you want to see in our posts, instead of understanding what we actually write... so please, slow down, take a breath, and start realizing that we are NOT against you in this. We do not completely disagree with you, and we do NOT hate all Muslims.

For Allah's sake, chill out!
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Aimster
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

Allah means God. It doesn't mean a Muslim God.
ummm, did you even read the OP? The OP accounts for all of those possibilities.
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
on another note, since when did modern Islamic terrorists start targeting a certain religion? Their entire modus operandi fails to take the religion of their victims into account. Therefore, although it's very unlikely, the Utah attack still does fit the profile of a modern Islamic terrorist attack.

The location of the attack, the citizenship of the victims, and the symbolic nature of each of those factors, are much more important to terrorists than the religion or beliefs of the individual victims.

Tell me, what would you call a modern Christian terrorist? What's the f*****g difference? Do you send the military to fight one but law enforcement to fight another?
It all depends on their location. Law enforcement takes care of terrorists and terrorist incidents located on US soil, while the military may be used to take care of terrorists on foreign soil.

Now, what would I call a "modern Christian terrorist"? I would call them exactly that. The IRA comes to mind... One could describe them as a group of modern Christian terrorists. What was your point?

Would the IRA be a part of the Global War on Terror?
I'm sure they are if you're from England! However, AFAIK, they pose very little threat to the United States... if any! so, while we may assist England in their fight against the IRA, they are not exactly at the top of our list of priorities.

But I agree with your underlying point: modern terrorism is not a market entirely cornered by Islam... they just happen to hold the majority stick at the moment! ;)
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,764
6,770
126
It strikes me that killing yourself as you kill as many others as you can speaks of tremendous inner violence and repressed rage. Seems to me that, in turn, is a sign of profound inner humiliation. So if there's a lot of people walking around with this form of mental illness those interested in fomenting this type of terrorism via suicide killers will find a ready market of people eager to do their bidding. It strikes me, then, that the way to combat terrorism is to know yourself, to understand the nature and source of humiliation, what it is and how it came to be. Seems to me too that the way to fight the war on terrorism is really to fight the war on mental illness. It is, I think, the cumulative sickness of each of us we see being expressed. The war on terror begins with the war on your own madness. Oddly, that is what real Jihad is.
 

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
As soon as the so called "peaceful Muslims" spend more time denouncing the real muslim terrorist than protesting depictions of fictional ones on TV I will listen to them.


Muslims kill more Muslims than anyone else, yet for some reason they don't see a problem with it. Go figure, I say, cheer them on.

---

Did you read our notice in the op? You are getting close to the limit.

AnandTech Moderator
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Aimster
The kid was messed up in the head. The country he lived in killed his people because they were Muslim. I don't see how people who create such threads miss the irony. He came from a country that killed Muslims yet people are going around showing him as an example of Muslim violence. Yet, the very place he is from shows great violence against Muslims.

Allah means God. It doesn't mean a Muslim God.
ummm, did you even read the OP? The OP accounts for all of those possibilities.
The guy who went on the shooting rampage was white.

Going to a mall targeting everyone shows that you don't care about their religion.
You cannot look at a person and know their religion.
on another note, since when did modern Islamic terrorists start targeting a certain religion? Their entire modus operandi fails to take the religion of their victims into account. Therefore, although it's very unlikely, the Utah attack still does fit the profile of a modern Islamic terrorist attack.

The location of the attack, the citizenship of the victims, and the symbolic nature of each of those factors, are much more important to terrorists than the religion or beliefs of the individual victims.

Tell me, what would you call a modern Christian terrorist? What's the f*****g difference? Do you send the military to fight one but law enforcement to fight another?
It all depends on their location. Law enforcement takes care of terrorists and terrorist incidents located on US soil, while the military may be used to take care of terrorists on foreign soil.

Now, what would I call a "modern Christian terrorist"? I would call them exactly that. The IRA comes to mind... One could describe them as a group of modern Christian terrorists. What was your point?

Would the IRA be a part of the Global War on Terror?
I'm sure they are if you're from England! However, AFAIK, they pose very little threat to the United States... if any! so, while we may assist England in their fight against the IRA, they are not exactly at the top of our list of priorities.

But I agree with your underlying point: modern terrorism is not a market entirely cornered by Islam... they just happen to hold the majority stick at the moment! ;)

That's the problem right there. We can't call this the GWOT unless we're ready to take on every terrorist on this planet. An example of this was when our highly intelligent and well-spoken President decided to send Marines to the Phillipines to fight Abu Sayyaf in 2002. Now they became our problem and the Muslim world saw it as that. These grandiose, ideological struggles are not meant to be fought militarily. WE WILL LOSE that battle. Let law enforcement deal with all these terrorist, they are better at that then our ideological President. Furthermore, once Bush is out of office, hopefully America can change it's foreign policy that includes more common sense.
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
You seem to dislike the concept of the GWOT, but apparently have no problem with the concept of the Ummah where muslims are supposed to "protect" other muslims from outsiders, a.k.a infidels, crusaders, etc -- while absolving them from any loyalty to the country in which they live.

I suppose that's their version of the GWOT.