• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Indictments coming...

Page 193 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
brandonbull said:
www.cnn.com

READ: FISA court on FBI conduct | CNN Politics

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court slammed the FBI for mistakes it made in the Carter Page surveillance warrants.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
www.cnn.com

FISA court slams FBI conduct in Carter Page surveillance warrant applications

The typically ultra-close-lipped Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court slammed the FBI for mistakes it made in the Carter Page surveillance warrants and ordered the agency to detail how it will improve its warrant applications in light of the errors, uncovered recently by the Justice...
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
www.nbcnews.com

Secret FISA court issues highly unusual public rebuke of FBI for mistakes

The criticism comes after a report by the DOJ inspector general that found "so many basic and fundamental errors."
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com

Nothing to see here, right? Just more made up Trump lies and right wing spin? If CNN and other Progressheviks propaganda sites are reporting in, it must be bad.
Click to expand...
Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerp

Massive records collection on Dem congressman, staff, and families by Trump DOJ

Can't believe this hasn't been posted yet. Not only were their phone records, and email records collected, Apple and CNN were under gag orders up until recently not to tell about this. Adam Schiff calls for investigation after report of his phone records being seized by Trump DOJ - POLITICO...
forums.anandtech.com
 
UNCjigga said:
Indictments coming…tomorrow?? But of course, the orange weasel gets away clean while his devoted yes-man takes the fall.

www.wsj.com

WSJ News Exclusive | Trump Organization and CFO Allen Weisselberg Indicted on Tax Charges

The first criminal allegations stemming from New York prosecutors’ probe into the former president’s business affairs will be made public Thursday in court.
www.wsj.com www.wsj.com
Click to expand...
One thing Trump does that is actually smart, he never texts and he has no email address.
 
soundforbjt said:
One thing Trump does that is actually smart, he never texts and he has no email address.
Click to expand...
Yep, and then he blames everything on anybody but himself. Actually, I'm sure he's using it at this very moment to intimidate him. "You know Allen, I've got so much dirt on you, you don't have shit on me" "What do I know about creative accounting".
 
Last edited:
uclaLabrat said:
I think its a premature assessment, they're likely working up the ladder.
Click to expand...

Ahh, I was thinking they stopped making progress (AW isn’t talking) and that’s why they’re now serving indictments. But you’re right that they’ll continue work him and try to make a deal before trial/sentencing.
 
UNCjigga said:
Ahh, I was thinking they stopped making progress (AW isn’t talking) and that’s why they’re now serving indictments. But you’re right that they’ll continue work him and try to make a deal before trial/sentencing.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'm obviously not a lawyer but effectively the difference between saying "you're in serious legal jeopardy" and "here's an indictment for 4 felonies and associated misdemeanors worth 10-40 years" is probably very effective in crystallizong the level of loyalty one might be willing to commit to 😂
 
uclaLabrat said:
Yeah, I'm obviously not a lawyer but effectively the difference between saying "you're in serious legal jeopardy" and "here's an indictment for 4 felonies and associated misdemeanors worth 10-40 years" is probably very effective in crystallizong the level of loyalty one might be willing to commit to 😂
Click to expand...
One would like to think so, but Trump obviously has him quite intimidated, and he's a Fn fool for not having his own outside lawyer.
 
The only way Trump can get charged for tax related crimes at soonest, would only be possibly when one of his children turns against him, and testify against Trump. I doubt that would happen, as it seems the four major Trump children (excluding Barron) seem supportive of their father. As for Barron, he probably is too young to know anything in regards to what his father did in the past.

Another possibility would be when one of Trump's children get indicted and charged. Then Trump would etart to be in big trouble.
 
s0me0nesmind1 said:
Lefties here should give pause for concern for big government - If you think this is something that will only be used for your "enemy" Republicans, think again.

But hey - you're all idiots, so I know critical thinking can be tough on you.




https://twitter.com/x/status/1418203878177259522
Click to expand...

Any concerns about reports of the former President obtaining phone records of reporters and people he generally didn’t like?
 
Fanatical Meat said:
Any concerns about reports of the former President obtaining phone records of reporters and people he generally didn’t like?
Click to expand...

Ab-so-fucking-lutely. Though that isn't exactly incriminating, illegal, or immoral? What is he going to do, call them and say "You suck"? Plus he

I'm just saying laws and enforcement changes are a WEE bit different than having phone numbers.
 
Sounds like the guy may be guilty, if everything in the charging papers is accurate.

Is this all from Durham, or is there going to be more? Because it isn't that impressive a result if that is all. A two year investigation ought to unearth more than one lawyer who was a peripheral figure in all this telling the FBI that he was there on his own behalf when in fact he was there on behalf of a client.
 
brandonbull said:
Looks like we got another Russia collusion indictment.

DOJ special counsel Durham secures indictment against DC cybersecurity lawyer in Russia review

The charge against Michael Sussmann, an attorney whose firm is closely tied with Democratic Party interests, is linked to a 2016 contact with the FBI.
www.usatoday.com www.usatoday.com
Click to expand...

So what? I thought Durham was investigating how the crooked FBI was spying on the Trump campaign & persecuting them mercilessly, like poor Michael Flynn. What happened with that?

The notion that Baker didn't realize Sussman's involvement was political is completely absurd & the indictment along with it.
 
Jhhnn said:
So what? I thought Durham was investigating how the crooked FBI was spying on the Trump campaign & persecuting them mercilessly, like poor Michael Flynn. What happened with that?

The notion that Baker didn't realize Sussman's involvement was political is completely absurd & the indictment along with it.
Click to expand...
This will go....nowhere.
 
What difference does it make if you found out there might be evidence that Trump was working with Putin to steal the Presidential election of the United States if you dug up that evidence yourself or had it given to you by a client. You would still be morally bound to notify the FBI of that possibility and you would still be doing it from the perspective of personal patriotic duty. This guy and the Clinton Org. if they were involved should be up for medals and Trump should be doing in depth research on the Osama Nibble Fish.

Unfortunately, and as only liberals can understand, real justice, for the sake of protecting the individual from the state, must be bound by the principle of innocent until proven guilty even if it sometimes lets the guilty slip away.
 
Jhhnn said:
So what? I thought Durham was investigating how the crooked FBI was spying on the Trump campaign & persecuting them mercilessly, like poor Michael Flynn. What happened with that?

The notion that Baker didn't realize Sussman's involvement was political is completely absurd & the indictment along with it.
Click to expand...

Well, it does technically qualify as perjury. I seem to recall the same argument was made when Flynn lied to the FBI, that the FBI knew the truth anyway so the lie wasn't material. Except it was the right making that argument. And it was a bad argument.

That said, this is pretty ticky-tack for a perjury charge. It sounds like Durham couldn't really find much of anything and was desperate to justify the two years and taxpayer dollars spent on his investigation.
 
woolfe9998 said:
Well, it does technically qualify as perjury. I seem to recall the same argument was made when Flynn lied to the FBI, that the FBI knew the truth anyway so the lie wasn't material. Except it was the right making that argument. And it was a bad argument.

That said, this is pretty ticky-tack for a perjury charge. It sounds like Durham couldn't really find much of anything and was desperate to justify the two years and taxpayer dollars spent on his investigation.
Click to expand...
Thankfully the GOP lit settled law and judicial norms on fire and we can now do whatever the fuck we want. Biden should pardon him immediately, fire Durham and incite everyone to start making death threats against his family for this witch-hunt. Also: Fake News.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top