• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Indictments coming...

Page 189 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
fskimospy said:
It’s weird that people like you keep trying to deny Trump campaign collusion with the Russians even after Trump Jr. came out and publicly admitted it, even including the incriminating emails.
Click to expand...

I almost reported your post for spreading lies (russian collusion), but respect you to much.

Russian collusion has been proven to be nothing but a hoax spread by Democrats to discredit Trump. Get over it, Trump won, hillary lost. Even to this day Hillary can not accept she lost fair and square.
 
Texashiker said:
I almost reported your post for spreading lies (russian collusion), but respect you to much.

Russian collusion has been proven to be nothing but a hoax spread by Democrats to discredit Trump. Get over it, Trump won, hillary lost. Even to this day Hillary can not accept she lost fair and square.
Click to expand...
Donald Trump Jr. personally released emails in which he agreed to meet with agents of the Russian government to get incriminating information about Hillary Clinton. You can read them yourself, right now.

As far as reporting my posts to I want to make it clear that I have no respect for you and so please report away.
 
Texashiker said:
I almost reported your post for spreading lies (russian collusion), but respect you to much.

Russian collusion has been proven to be nothing but a hoax spread by Democrats to discredit Trump. Get over it, Trump won, hillary lost. Even to this day Hillary can not accept she lost fair and square.
Click to expand...

talk about lies.

how has this been proven? You have some information that the rest of the literate world has never been privy too? Please, link it up, because I'm interested in this evidence that rejects what was clearly detailed in the Mueller report, and including the testimony of Trump's family, advisors, and admin peeps.
 
MtnMan said:
Oh no, another mommy's boy, crying because people are being mean by telling the truth.
Click to expand...

It is amusing to see how many of them are turning into complete crybaby bitches. Not sure if this is a sign that even they're getting the feeling that Turmp is gonna lose, or what, but you can practically feel them about to burst into tears from their posts.

I still remember when Obama steamrolled Romney (hey, where's all the dipshits that kept hoping Mitt would stop being Maladjustna's sister wife to Turmp?) and conservatives openly were going "we have to do some soul searching" where it was like it clicked that maybe their blatant racism and hatred for most Americans ("hey fuck your health care!") had gone too far. So they instead decided they'd just resort to straight up criminal behavior instead. And then their little pissant peons suddenly had their balls grow 3 sizes and start talking shit, which they of course can't handle 1/100th of, but expect the whole world to be sympathetic to their plight.

Which, I'm assuming the person you're responding to must be out of work yet again if he has time to come back. That's been the recurring situation for years now. He loses a job, spends all his time posting on here spouting the dumbest shit imaginable, then tucks his tail between his legs and goes to suckup to one of the 50 former employers he's had in the past 5 years for a few months of work so his wife will get off his back (or maybe be able to get off hers...).
 
Texashiker said:
I almost reported your post for spreading lies (russian collusion), but respect you to much.

Russian collusion has been proven to be nothing but a hoax spread by Democrats to discredit Trump. Get over it, Trump won, hillary lost. Even to this day Hillary can not accept she lost fair and square.
Click to expand...
You should understand that your value as a human being has nothing whatsoever to do with what party you belong to and whose loyalty you think makes you a better person for having. Your value as a human being arises solely in expression and manifestation of the One in whose image you were created. Love you. Relax and be happy.
 
fskimospy said:
Donald Trump Jr. personally released emails in which he agreed to meet with agents of the Russian government to get incriminating information about Hillary Clinton. You can read them yourself, right now.

As far as reporting my posts to I want to make it clear that I have no respect for you and so please report away.
Click to expand...
It's to bad the House missed that when they impeached Trump.
 
Greenman said:
It's to bad the House missed that when they impeached Trump.
Click to expand...

So what? McConnell & the GOP Senate DGAF. Trump. He's their guy, and they'll stick with him no matter what unless he loses the election. They seem to have rejected his threat to stay in power even if that happens, Kinda-sorta. Some of them, anyway. We'll see, right?
 
fskimospy said:
Why is what the house did relevant?

Are you denying that Trump Jr. met with representatives of the Russian government for the purpose of colluding to win the 2016 election?
Click to expand...
I'm not denying anything. My point was that the House apparently missed that confessed fact and didn't include it in the impeachment charges. Pretty sloppy work.
 
Jhhnn said:
So what? McConnell & the GOP Senate DGAF. Trump. He's their guy, and they'll stick with him no matter what unless he loses the election. They seem to have rejected his threat to stay in power even if that happens, Kinda-sorta. Some of them, anyway. We'll see, right?
Click to expand...
Then why did they bother with the impeachment at all? Why not include every charge they could find? Are you saying it was simply a "token" impeachment, just so they could say they did it? They we're just looking to pad their resumes or what?
 
Greenman said:
I'm not denying anything. My point was that the House apparently missed that confessed fact and didn't include it in the impeachment charges. Pretty sloppy work.
Click to expand...
The House didn't Impeach Trump for the 2016 election, so why would they have included that?

You do know what they Impeached him for? Or you're at least googling it now?
 
Greenman said:
I'm not denying anything. My point was that the House apparently missed that confessed fact and didn't include it in the impeachment charges. Pretty sloppy work.
Click to expand...
I mean there is a very long list of things the House should impeach Trump for and hasn’t yet, haha. The last four years should have basically been a continuous impeachment trial.

Regardless I’m glad you are no longer disputing the collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.
 
fskimospy said:
I mean there is a very long list of things the House should impeach Trump for and hasn’t yet, haha. The last four years should have basically been a continuous impeachment trial.

Regardless I’m glad you are no longer disputing the collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.
Click to expand...
Don't misunderstand, I completely reject the idea. I'm sure they communicated with the Russians, but that isn't a crime. Bob's team spent a whole bunch of time and money looking into it and came up with nothing.
If it looks like a duck, walks like an alligator, and roars like a lion, it's probably not a duck.
 
Greenman said:
I'm not denying anything. My point was that the House apparently missed that confessed fact and didn't include it in the impeachment charges. Pretty sloppy work.
Click to expand...

So now it's the House's fault for "not impeaching enough" rather than Senate for acquitting, despite substantial evidence regarding legitimate grounds for impeachment and conviction?

You seem to believe that the Senate had any honest intent to take the impeachment seriously you know, after they very publicly announced, multiple times, that they wouldn't, regardless of how the House acted.

interesting.
 
Greenman said:
Don't misunderstand, I completely reject the idea. I'm sure they communicated with the Russians, but that isn't a crime. Bob's team spent a whole bunch of time and money looking into it and came up with nothing.
If it looks like a duck, walks like an alligator, and roars like a lion, it's probably not a duck.
Click to expand...
Collusion isn’t a criminal term so it’s unclear to me why you’re talking about crimes? Regardless, if you’re saying that the Trump campaign meeting with the Russian government for the purposes of obtaining illegal election help isn’t collusion then I don’t know what to say. It’s the dictionary definition of it - are you rejecting the dictionary now too?

As far as Mueller goes it sounds like you’ve never read the report and are instead relying on lies by conservative media. Mueller was very clear that while he was unable to establish a criminal conspiracy this was heavily impeded by the lies and obstruction of justice perpetrated by the administration.
 
zinfamous said:
So now it's the House's fault for "not impeaching enough" rather than Senate for acquitting, despite substantial evidence regarding legitimate grounds for impeachment and conviction?

You seem to believe that the Senate had any honest intent to take the impeachment seriously you know, after they very publicly announced, multiple times, that they wouldn't, regardless of how the House acted.

interesting.
Click to expand...
Haha, apparently secretly meeting with people to get illegal election help isn’t collusion.

It’s really weird to see the lies people tell themselves to avoid admitting that they were wrong. It’s even weirder that they expect us to believe those lies even when they are laugh out loud ridiculous like this.
 
Greenman said:
Then why did they bother with the impeachment at all? Why not include every charge they could find? Are you saying it was simply a "token" impeachment, just so they could say they did it? They we're just looking to pad their resumes or what?
Click to expand...

They saw it as their duty. Their oath-

“I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

Win or lose, nobody can say they didn't try to stop Trump.
 
Greenman said:
Don't misunderstand, I completely reject the idea. I'm sure they communicated with the Russians, but that isn't a crime. Bob's team spent a whole bunch of time and money looking into it and came up with nothing.
If it looks like a duck, walks like an alligator, and roars like a lion, it's probably not a duck.
Click to expand...

Let's see what you say on Nov.2 when the un-redacted report comes out..
That should be interesting!
 
Greenman said:
Don't misunderstand, I completely reject the idea. I'm sure they communicated with the Russians, but that isn't a crime. Bob's team spent a whole bunch of time and money looking into it and came up with nothing.
If it looks like a duck, walks like an alligator, and roars like a lion, it's probably not a duck.
Click to expand...
https://imgur.com/WutGgy9
Your motivated blindness is pretty obvious.
 
It’s hard to keep up with all the clusterfucks this week. At any other time, this would be huge. This is not a partisan Democrat saying this. This is not a low level Republican saying this. This is not someone with little knowledge of national security saying this.

Former national security adviser H.R. McMaster said Thursday that President Donald Trump is “aiding and abetting” Russian President Vladimir Putin’s efforts to sow doubt about the American electoral system.
Click to expand...

“I agree that he is aiding and abetting Putin’s efforts by not being direct about this, right? By not just calling out Putin for what he’s doing,” McMaster said. You know, Putin gets away with, I mean, literally murder or attempted murder … because people don’t call him out on it,” he added. “And so they are able to continue with this kind of fire hose of falsehood, to sow these conspiracy theories. And we just can’t be our own worst enemies.”
Click to expand...

www.politico.com

Trump’s ex-national security adviser says president is ‘aiding and abetting’ Putin

H.R. McMaster’s warning represents perhaps his harshest public criticism of the president since the retired general was ousted from the White House in 2018.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top