Indictments coming...

Page 120 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,887
15,346
136
Again, I think this all stems from the fact that you don’t understand what you’re talking about. You and I have no idea what information was on Clinton’s server that later turned out to be classified. It could absolutely have simply been something in the news.

For example read this: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/28/us-army-blocks-guardian-website-access

DOD networks blocked news stories about Snowden specifically because that would have meant classified information was on unclas networks. Did you read or talk about the Snowden leaks? If so, you were likely transmitting classified information. There are plenty of other examples.

So once again, tell me why you’re different than Clinton, considering you have no idea the nature of what was classified on her server.

psst. he already understands this but it doesnt fit his MO of being a troll.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,631
30,164
136
So once again, tell me why you’re different than Clinton, considering you have no idea the nature of what was classified on her server.

Clinton was guilty because feels, she is the mostest guilty ever, she must be punished for her many many crimes.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,261
4,944
136
If you read classified material you aren't authorized to see you've mishandled it. You don't have to be aware at the time you are reading it that it is classified to have mishandled it.

Be a man and own it. Oh wait, I forgot I was responding the petulant man baby. NM, keep on being a dumb ass.

Oh, and Fuck Your Feelings

I see you do not understand the difference.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,631
30,164
136
I handled Top Secret and below information daily for 20 years.

I remember back when I was a Missile Technician in the US Navy and Readers Digest published an article about the Poseidon Missile program. They had listed many things that were Top Secret in the articles as in the number of warheads, ranges etc...

Did they break the law when they published it? The answer is no. Because it was not published as an official document, but as speculation. It was not verified even though we all knew that much of it was true and factual. Now if we had come out and verified that this information was indeed true then we would be guilty as we were in the loop so to speak due to our positions and training about this system.

Patraous and Hillary are guilty due to their positions and knowledge of the information they possessed.

Me posting shit that was in the news is not the same thing, regardless of how you and that other asshole try and spin it.

If you cannot see this I am sorry for you.

pcgeek11 you ignorant slut, keep trying to shift those goal posts.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,261
4,944
136
Clinton was guilty because feels, she is the mostest guilty ever, she must be punished for her many many crimes.


No, Hillary is guilty of mishandling classified information that she knows or should know is classified due to her position as sec of state.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,631
30,164
136
BTW since the subject of the thread is Trump, his hanger's on, and his campaign can we get back to that instead of the pcgeek's obsession with cankles?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,408
16,799
136
I see you do not understand the difference.

Yep, its everyone but the hypocritical piece of shit that doesn't understand the difference. Oh, and its the DOJ, who didn't bring charged against Clinton, and the IG report, that found no violations by Hillary were ignored, who don't get it.

It's everyone but you. Surely the guy who handled low level classified information for twenty years, know better than everyone else!
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,261
4,944
136
"mishandling" is your claim, that's your label for it. That doesn't mean the information wasn't classified. Its also why you claiming Hillary mishandled classified information and when you did exactly the same thing and not declaring it the same type of violation, laughable.

But again, being a hypocritical piece of shit, is your MO.

I see you know nothing about the handling of classified information.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,631
30,164
136
No, Hillary is guilty of mishandling classified information that she knows or should know is classified due to her position as sec of state.

Except legal professionals (of which you are most certainly not one) couldn't make that leap because they need actual evidence not your fucking feels.. Now are you capable of discussing the thread topic or just obsessing over an old woman whose role in American politics is pretty much done?
 

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
If you read classified material you aren't authorized to see you've mishandled it. You don't have to be aware at the time you are reading it that it is classified to have mishandled it.

Be a man and own it. Oh wait, I forgot I was responding the petulant man baby. NM, keep on being a dumb ass.

Oh, and Fuck Your Feelings
High five for remembering to fu*k his feelings!
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,408
16,799
136
No, Hillary is guilty of mishandling classified information that she knows or should know is classified due to her position as sec of state.

Oh shit the hypocritical piece of shit strikes again! Mister, "we need to wait till the investigation is over to find out if trump is guilty of a crime", suddenly decides a complete investigation(s) and no charge brought means Hillary is guilty of a crime!

What a fucking joke you are and to think you leeched off of tax payers for twenty years as a glorified button pushing janitor.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,261
4,944
136
BTW since the subject of the thread is Trump, his hanger's on, and his campaign can we get back to that instead of the pcgeek's obsession with cankles?



Yep, its everyone but the hypocritical piece of shit that doesn't understand the difference. Oh, and its the DOJ, who didn't bring charged against Clinton, and the IG report, that found no violations by Hillary were ignored, who don't get it.

It's everyone but you. Surely the guy who handled low level classified information for twenty years, know better than everyone else!

Just defending myself against the morons that have never handled a classified document in their lives and have no idea what they are talking about.

I'm done with you idiots in this thread.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,631
30,164
136
Oh shit the hypocritical piece of shit strikes again! Mister, "we need to wait till the investigation is over to find out if trump is guilty of a crime", suddenly decides a complete investigation(s) and no charge brought means Hillary is guilty of a crime!

What a fucking joke you are and to think you leeched off of tax payers for twenty years as a glorified button pushing janitor.

Dude if he did his 20 years we're still paying him.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,408
16,799
136
Just defending myself against the morons that have never handled a classified document in their lives and have no idea what they are talking about.

I'm done with you idiots in this thread.

And I'm deferring to people who are above you and who have better knowledge and higher clearances of handling classified information. Do you know more than them? Is there a reason anyone would take your word over theirs?
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,631
30,164
136
Just defending myself against the morons that have never handled a classified document in their lives and have no idea what they are talking about.

You're expecting to dump fact free bull shit and not be called out for it. But I do love how you constantly expose what kind of hypocrite you are. An investigation couldn't find the evidence to prove Hillary did it but by god she is "guilty" in your eyes.

But old Trumpy, we shouldn't jump to any conclusions about him or the people around him because there is still an ongoing investigation. In interesting news that ongoing investigation has returned actual criminal indictments against people indicating there is substantially more evidence of wrong doing than uncovered in ANY of the investigations of Hillary.

Now I fully expect you to continue to be the petulant man baby who is incapable of admitting error, so carry on.

But Fuck Your Feelings
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,408
16,799
136
Thanks for my monthly check. I'll enjoy it special this month just for you!

LOL all the way to the bank.

My pleasure! Unlike you, I'm always down to help out my fellow humans and fellow Americans, who cannot provide for themselves, no matter how deplorable they are.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,631
30,164
136
Thanks for my monthly check. I'll enjoy it special this month just for you!

LOL all the way to the bank.

Hey you earned it, you did your time and I do appreciate your service. I disagree with you on just about everything but I do appreciate you for that.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,850
146
Sigh. Again, it was a viral social media campaign combined with government sponsored hacking that included false news stories, false news sites, and break ins to government and private servers. Ads on Facebook are but a small part of it. There were thousands of Facebook and Twitter accounts set up by the Russian government to plant false news stories. All conspired and in collusion with the Trump campaign.

And you want to believe that a country with the intelligence capabilities of Russia can have no effect...

Dude. Just stop.

Seriously.

Your denials are pathetic.

Its more than that. They also not only hacked one party deliberately after a public request by members of the other party, they were actively meeting with and providing such info from that (and very likely other information) to members of that party's campaign, and we don't yet know the extent of what those groups all partook in.
 

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
No, Hillary is guilty of mishandling classified information that she knows or should know is classified due to her position as sec of state.
what the Fu*k is your point? The current president is a Traitor! Classified information is cannon fodder to him and certainly not safe in his hands. Shut your hateful ignorant mouth. How the fu*k does it pay to go on and on about Hillary when Trump is selling and destroying the country. Geezuz you're a Fu*king dumb c*nt. How do you not feel completely stupid and petty and childish EVERY TIME you bring Hillary up at this point? She's done. Pay attention to now! Or FU*K OFF!

It infuriates me that you are so purposefully stupid. I truly doubt you have even a single redeeming quality.