• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Indictments coming...

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
crashtech said:
Does that mean that allegations are a tool to achieve desired ends, regardless of their merit?
Click to expand...

It's not even so much the allegations. Rather the complete lack of transparency and completely unhinged ramblings of a dementia riddled old man give me serious pause as to his ability or authenticity to do anything remotely positive for the overall population of this country. The GOP have hitched their wagon to this madness and have yet to pull the safety brake. Trump and co have almost never admitted any fault and it's just one continuous lie and walk back after another. At this point even if he *IS* telling the truth a majority of the population will never believe him.

Recent polls have suggested that some of his base are starting to pull away. His largest loss in a recent Quinnipac survey was with non-colllege educated white people. AKA his core. He dropped almost 10 points in that category. The base is eroding. Eventually the GOP are going to have to face the music and realize he's more of a burden than a blessing to them come 2018. Is it too much to ask for a bit of sanity, measured responses and actual compassion for a majority of the 330 million people that live here instead of nothing but petty squabbles, after dinner bombing entertainment and enriching already rich billionaires?
 
vi edit said:
It's not even so much the allegations. Rather the complete lack of transparency and completely unhinged ramblings of a dementia riddled old man give me serious pause as to his ability or authenticity to do anything remotely positive for the overall population of this country. The GOP have hitched their wagon to this madness and have yet to pull the safety brake. Trump and co have almost never admitted any fault and it's just one continuous lie and walk back after another. At this point even if he *IS* telling the truth a majority of the population will never believe him.

Recent polls have suggested that some of his base are starting to pull away. His largest loss in a recent Quinnipac survey was with non-colllege educated white people. AKA his core. He dropped almost 10 points in that category. The base is eroding. Eventually the GOP are going to have to face the music and realize he's more of a burden than a blessing to them come 2018. Is it too much to ask for a bit of sanity, measured responses and actual compassion for a majority of the 330 million people that live here instead of nothing but petty squabbles, after dinner bombing entertainment and enriching already rich billionaires?
Click to expand...
That's a lot of words to say "yes." All these investigations that go nowhere are just causing people to be jaded about accusations of wrongdoing. Every time our investigative apparatus is misused for political ends, we embolden unscrupulous players and edge a bit closer to the kind of pervasive corruption formerly seen mainly in Third World countries.
 
crashtech said:
That's a lot of words to say "yes." All these investigations that go nowhere are just causing people to be jaded about accusations of wrongdoing. Every time our investigative apparatus is misused for political ends, we embolden unscrupulous players and edge a bit closer to the kind of pervasive corruption formerly seen mainly in Third World countries.
Click to expand...

Ok then lets just end the politics and 3 ring circus and appoint an independent investigation and get this wrapped up quickly. Is that too much to ask?
 
vi edit said:
Ok then lets just end the politics and 3 ring circus and appoint an independent investigation and get this wrapped up quickly. Is that too much to ask?
Click to expand...
Yeah, agree 100%, though we seem to be at the point where there's almost no such thing as an independent anything.
 
jackstar7 said:
What qualifies you to be Lib-police?
Click to expand...
Duh.The same qualifications that prompt anyone in here to be police of any sort prompt me to be the lib-police. This forum is full of conservative police. Yet if someone who is liberal comes in and polices their own they are somehow bad? Like I said previously, libs hate to be told what to do, all while telling other what to do.
Also, you don't seem to consider that the "Oompa Loompa" you are talking about has access to the world's most powerful nuclear arsenal, and has petty fights on twitter. The two of those facts should give everyone pause.
Click to expand...
His idiocy on Twitter means he might push the nuclear button? Over-react much? Sheesh. And folks in here wonder why I bring up the unhinged left?

Thanks for the wonderfully glorious demonstration of my point. Your post is much appreciated.
 
TastesLikeChicken said:
Duh.The same qualifications that prompt anyone in here to be police of any sort prompt me to be the lib-police. This forum is full of conservative police. Yet if someone who is liberal comes in and polices their own they are somehow bad? Like I said previously, libs hate to be told what to do, all while telling other what to do.

His idiocy on Twitter means he might push the nuclear button? Over-react much? Sheesh. And folks in here wonder why I bring up the unhinged left?

Thanks for the wonderfully glorious demonstration of my point. Your post is much appreciated.
Click to expand...

So you're missing the point that this man is dangerous?

Volatility and impulsivity plus being spoiled, entitled, greedy, a fame whore, thin skinned, likely mentally declining and harboring a disdain for the vast majority of the populous... Yes, the Dems need to look into fixing the party but Trump is a more pressing matter. Police away with your misdirected displeasure but remember to poke some breathing holes in whatever hole you've got your head stuck in.
 
Younigue said:
So you're missing the point that this man is dangerous?

Volatility and impulsivity plus being spoiled, entitled, greedy, a fame whore, thin skinned, likely mentally declining and harboring a disdain for the vast majority of the populous... Yes, the Dems need to look into fixing the party but Trump is a more pressing matter. Police away with your misdirected displeasure but remember to poke some breathing holes in whatever hole you've got your head stuck in.
Click to expand...

Ya got a good heart. Don't waste your time on SmellsLikeBullshit. His MO is wash, rinse, repeat...
 
UberNeuman said:
Ya got a good heart. Don't waste your time on SmellsLikeBullshit. His MO is wash, rinse, repeat...
Click to expand...
Thank you. And I will keep that in mind. He just seems confused and angry in a rather comical way as opposed to the reasonable (?) Person he believes he is portraying. It taunts me a bit.
 
TastesLikeChicken said:
Duh.The same qualifications that prompt anyone in here to be police of any sort prompt me to be the lib-police. This forum is full of conservative police. Yet if someone who is liberal comes in and polices their own they are somehow bad? Like I said previously, libs hate to be told what to do, all while telling other what to do.

His idiocy on Twitter means he might push the nuclear button? Over-react much? Sheesh. And folks in here wonder why I bring up the unhinged left?

Thanks for the wonderfully glorious demonstration of my point. Your post is much appreciated.
Click to expand...
Tell me, why did he attack Syria?
 
jackstar7 said:
What qualifies you to be Lib-police?

Also, you don't seem to consider that the "Oompa Loompa" you are talking about has access to the world's most powerful nuclear arsenal, and has petty fights on twitter. The two of those facts should give everyone pause.
Click to expand...
Don't be hard on him. He's really concerned for us.
/s
 
Awww. The conservative police are butthurt when someone breaks ranks.

Poor kids. You, hopefully, will grow up some day. Probably not in the near future though. Go ahead. Work on your stank face for whenever you might confront a perceived righty. It's what politics is all about.

Bunch of sad limpys.
 
TastesLikeChicken said:
Awww. The conservative police are butthurt when someone breaks ranks.

Poor kids. You, hopefully, will grow up some day. Probably not in the near future though. Go ahead. Work on your stank face for whenever you might confront a perceived righty. It's what politics is all about.

Bunch of sad limpys.
Click to expand...
Hey, TLC! I see you're still flogging your "belligerent fvckwit" shtick, as you so eloquently put it long ago. Still shilling for the GOP, too, I see, while pretending to be a liberal. I thought you'd have a new assignment by now, or at least some new material. Tell us, did you ever figure out that invading Iraq was a fiasco and a fraud, or are you still its most fervent fluffer?

Anyway, you take care. Never know when some mean liberals might be hiding under your bed. 😀
 
Hey, any one else but the chickenlicks dude... what ranks is he talking about? Also has anyone ever done anything more than blink (to try and block the stupid) at their screen when the chick posts? I have no stank face for likes of that pretend liberal.
 
https://patribotics.blog/2017/05/14/exclusive-sealed-indictment-granted-against-donald-trump/

Separate sources with links to the intelligence and justice communities have stated that a sealed indictment has been granted against Donald Trump.

While it is understood that the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution means that, until Mr. Trump is impeached, he cannot be prosecuted, sources say that the indictment is intended by the FBI and prosecutors in the Justice Department to form the basis of Mr. Trump’s impeachment. The indictment is, perhaps uniquely, not intended or expected to be used for prosecution, sources say, because of the constitutional position of the President.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top