• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Indictments coming...

Page 41 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Even scarier, the country might be 1/4 made up of people like you. Probably not, but still.

1) "Hurr hurr no u" stopped being effective around third grade

2) If 1/4 of the country were like me we would not be in this mess, considering you're imagining a scenario where 1/4 of the country has an IQ of 145, a hard science degree, and knowledge of several languages.

Here's a hint: not everyone is a degenerate like you. Stop using yourself as "the measure of a man." You're way off on the left end of the bell curve.
 
1) "Hurr hurr no u" stopped being effective around third grade

2) If 1/4 of the country were like me we would not be in this mess, considering you're imagining a scenario where 1/4 of the country has an IQ of 145, a hard science degree, and knowledge of several languages.

Here's a hint: not everyone is a degenerate like you. Stop using yourself as "the measure of a man." You're way off on the left end of the bell curve.
Actually I was imagining a scenario where 1/4 of the country are arrogant, whiny, self-important drama queens filled with foamy rage and hatred toward anyone who dares not agree with them.

Come to think of it, this forum makes me think we might be there already . . .
 
Actually I was imagining a scenario where 1/4 of the country are arrogant, whiny, self-important drama queens filled with foamy rage and hatred toward anyone who dares not agree with them.

Come to think of it, this forum makes me think we might be there already . . .

Please enlighten me on your current Trump thoughts regarding Russian Lawyer meet up in June 2016
 
The altered emails bit is scurrilous bullshit. I challenge you to authenticate the claim.
Seriously?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/r...ld-emails-about-oil-terrorism/article/2567169
Hillary Clinton withheld Benghazi-related emails from the State Department that detailed her knowledge of the scramble for oil contracts in Libya and the shortcomings of the NATO-led military intervention for which she advocated.

Clinton removed specific portions of other emails she sent to State, suggesting the messages were screened closely enough to determine which paragraphs were unfit to be seen by the public.

For example, one email Clinton kept from the State Department indicates Libyan leaders were "well aware" of which "major oil companies and international banks" supported them during the rebellion, information they would "factor into decisions" about about who would be given access to the country's rich oil reserves.

The email, which Clinton subsequently scrubbed from her server, indicated Clinton was aware that involvement in the controversial conflict could have a significant financial benefit to firms that were friendly to the Libyan rebels.

She thanked Sidney Blumenthal, her former aide and author of dozens of informal intelligence memos, for the tip, which she called "useful," and informed him she was preparing to hold a meeting with Libyan leaders in Paris in an exchange that suggests the flow of information went both ways.

State Department officials admitted Clinton had withheld all of nine emails and parts of six others after Blumenthal provided 60 emails to the House Select Committee on Benghazi that the agency had failed to submit earlier this year.

Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., immediately demanded to know whether State or Clinton herself withheld the records. The agency's admission Thursday that it couldn't find 15 of the new emails in its records indicated both had played a role in keeping the emails away from Congress.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...all_about_the_freedom_of_information_act.html

If Lawrence O'Donnell can admit it, surely you too can do so.

The deleting of emails was also a bullshit claim as Clinton didn't delete her emails and instead left that decision to her lawyers.
Paying someone to do something illegal for you is still a crime. It's like rich people don't get any breaks at all, eh?
 
Please enlighten me on your current Trump thoughts regarding Russian Lawyer meet up in June 2016
Pretty much politics as usual - has there ever been a politician not willing to meet with someone claiming to have dirt on his opponent? How big a deal was it for instance when Ted Kennedy offered the Soviets help in defeating Reagan in the Cold War if they would help him defeat Reagan electorally?

Personally I don't think Trump has much to worry about with Russian connections. If Mueller takes him down, I think it will be by expanding the investigation a la Whitewater. With Trump's reputation, I cannot imagine that a special prosecutor could fail to find something criminal that he or a close associate has done given sufficient time and power. In the mean time/in lieu of that, the biggest advantage I see in a special prosecutor is reducing Trump's political capital, which limits the amount of unpopular things he can do.
 
Actually I was imagining a scenario where 1/4 of the country are arrogant, whiny, self-important drama queens filled with foamy rage and hatred toward anyone who dares not agree with them.

Come to think of it, this forum makes me think we might be there already . . .

For a second there I thought you were talking about the trolls of the Alt-bright. If you had been, you would have been correct.
 
Pretty much politics as usual - has there ever been a politician not willing to meet with someone claiming to have dirt on his opponent? How big a deal was it for instance when Ted Kennedy offered the Soviets help in defeating Reagan in the Cold War if they would help him defeat Reagan electorally?

Personally I don't think Trump has much to worry about with Russian connections. If Mueller takes him down, I think it will be by expanding the investigation a la Whitewater. With Trump's reputation, I cannot imagine that a special prosecutor could fail to find something criminal that he or a close associate has done given sufficient time and power. In the mean time/in lieu of that, the biggest advantage I see in a special prosecutor is reducing Trump's political capital, which limits the amount of unpopular things he can do.

I will say W Bush got some Al Gore play book mailed(?) to him and he turned it over to the FBI(?) sorry for being vague but that's what I remember.
This appears concrete and unusually sleazy
 
Funny that all the people who say it's all a shitty system and "both sides" everything are all sitting on one side of the U.S. political divide.

Hilarious even.

It's like those that abandon all hope enter the Republican party's BIG tent. Where cynicism goes to fuck over everyone.
 
Funny that all the people who say it's all a shitty system and "both sides" everything are all sitting on one side of the U.S. political divide.

"Both sides" is especially fallacious these days, since the left is worse than the right could ever dream of being. Thanks for the admission 🙂
 
"Both sides" is especially fallacious these days, since the left is worse than the right could ever dream of being. Thanks for the admission 🙂
You should recount all the ways it is worse. Really get the message out there.

It does seem worse at admitting crimes and colluding with Russians and lying on SF86 documents...
 
"Both sides" is especially fallacious these days, since the left is worse than the right could ever dream of being. Thanks for the admission 🙂

Well your side is driven by hate, conservatism, superiority (pssst, no such thing exists no matter what you try to do to make it true), the list goes on and on but all descriptors derive from the negative and/or from regressive agendas. Fundamentally Republicans are worse than Democrats. It's just true.
 
Gore.

Get your updated talking points.

You need to focus on how this is Obama's fault... somehow.

This is much better see quote from CNN

Alex Jones, the InfoWars founder who frequently peddles conspiracy theories and has been praised by Trump, conceived perhaps the oddest way to explain away the news to his audience. He told his listeners that Donald Trump Jr. was "doing his job" by "trying to find Russian spies."
 
Back
Top