Inaguration

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Originally Posted by dmcowen674
Yeah right. I've got a bridge for sale for you too.



You explain it.

You frequent P&N and magically have tickets to a much smaller inauguration.

Not a Donor, Yeah right

Maybe not in money but in something else.

I cant believe that I am agreeing with you. Of course donors and other special interests will be given tickets. I am not at all surprised that an obama supporter got tickets, I wonder if they will give tickets to people who aren't obama supporters?
 

monovillage

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2008
8,444
1
0
While the OP is clear about where he got his inauguration tickets (special lottery from his Congressman) it's not really controversial that some inauguration events/tickets are handed out to special interests.

http://www.france24.com/en/20130113-money-talks-obamas-inauguration
AFP - As hundreds of thousands of Americans crowd the National Mall for President Barack Obama's second inauguration on January 21, the best seats will already be filled -- sold for a hefty price.

Obama limited individual donations to $50,000 for his first inaugural in 2009, and banned corporate donors as he sought to distance himself from special interests amid the historic swearing-in of the country's first black president.

His reticence over money did little to stop the flow of cash, however, and the new US leader racked up a record $53 million in private donations, much of it coming from the 1.8 million people who packed Washington for the event.

This second time around, such lofty intentions -- and Obama's pledge to have the most transparent US administration ever -- appear to have been shelved in advance, with companies invited to join in -- and fund -- the proceedings.

For the White House is throwing open the gates of largesse for supporters to contribute as much as $1 million for special access. The money could buy much more than a coveted seat near the president as he takes the oath of office.

"This is an avenue for special interests, especially wealthy corporations, to get their last chance to throw money at the feet of the president," Craig Holman, an expert on campaign finance reform, told AFP.

"The real intent is for the corporations to buy access and influence with the White House," added Holman,

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ts-abided-for-obamas-second-inaugur/?page=all
Mr. Obama’s decision to accept unlimited-size corporate donations for his second inauguration is a stark departure from his first celebration four years ago, when he banned such contributions and limited individual donors to $50,000 each.

And it will mark the fourth time since 2007 that a champion of campaign finance reform has backtracked on his various pledges to lessen special interests’ grip on Washington.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-inauguration-donors-20130110,0,7777014.story

It's a notable shift from four years ago, when the newly elected president limited individual contributions to $50,000 and barred corporate entities entirely; this year, the Presidential Inaugural Committee cares less about where the money comes from than whether it's green, accepting unlimited donations from corporations or individuals. This has good-government organizations up in arms, not to mention conservative groups that accuse the president of hypocrisy. They aren't wrong, even if their cause is a little overblown.

On the subject of hypocrisy, Obama does have a disturbing tendency to harshly criticize his opponents for behavior that he later imitates; that may not be terribly unusual in presidential politics, but it at least seems worthy of note, or an explanation, or even an apology. On the subject of good governance, the inauguration decision sets yet another terrible precedent, signaling to insiders that the president's rhetoric about curbing special interests is nothing more than campaign blather to be swiftly ignored after the oath of office is administered — or in this case, even before.

To post about a political event like a presidential inauguration and then not expect that it will be commented on in a political fashion is folly.
 

SheHateMe

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2012
7,251
20
81
I cant believe that I am agreeing with you. Of course donors and other special interests will be given tickets. I am not at all surprised that an obama supporter got tickets, I wonder if they will give tickets to people who aren't obama supporters?


Both of you are incredibly stupid. He JUST told you how he got the tickets and you are on your "Obama supporter" schtick again.
 

nextJin

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2009
1,848
0
0
It is not going to be the same as 2008 but I hope you guys get close enough to see a glimmer lol, it's not special. Last time it was absolute hell for everyone involved and I refuse to go anywhere inside the beltway between 0500-0000 hrs
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Both of you are incredibly stupid. He JUST told you how he got the tickets and you are on your "Obama supporter" schtick again.

And you believe that some random guy won from the lottery? Its obvious what goes on, Corruption, the donors and special interests get rewarded by spending all their money on him.

Even dmcowen can understand this
 

nextJin

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2009
1,848
0
0
And you believe that some random guy won from the lottery? Its obvious what goes on, Corruption, the donors and special interests get rewarded by spending all their money on him.

Even dmcowen can understand this


Just stop, your bringing a stupid argument to the table. Do you think they would be sending out an invite to you? There are hundreds of thousands of people at these things, there are some who just wanted to go.

Though I will say the only Republicans likely there are those that have to be for whatever reason. Basically downtown DC is going to throw "LibFest 2013" so rightwingers better stay home.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,964
55,355
136
And you believe that some random guy won from the lottery? Its obvious what goes on, Corruption, the donors and special interests get rewarded by spending all their money on him.

Even dmcowen can understand this

So how did I get tickets?
 

SheHateMe

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2012
7,251
20
81
And you believe that some random guy won from the lottery? Its obvious what goes on, Corruption, the donors and special interests get rewarded by spending all their money on him.

Even dmcowen can understand this

You pretty much say the same thing in every one of your posts. It was already supported with proof that regular folk' DO get tickets to these events. You're just too dumb to accept the truth, you'd rather make up shit and carry on.
 

drebo

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,034
1
81
I don't understand the point of having an inauguration... The president isn't changing.

Hugeass waste of money, imo.

Guess the media needs its excuses to publicly slobber all over Black Jesus' knob.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,964
55,355
136
I don't understand the point of having an inauguration... The president isn't changing.

Hugeass waste of money, imo.

Guess the media needs its excuses to publicly slobber all over Black Jesus' knob.

Yeah, they never had inaugurations for re-elected presidents before. It's probably a librul media conspiracy.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
I don't understand the point of having an inauguration... The president isn't changing.

Hugeass waste of money, imo.

Guess the media needs its excuses to publicly slobber all over Black Jesus' knob.

Agree. There is no point to this nonsense especially considering all the tax dollars that are wasted for this crap. Nice to see that obama cares about the taxpayers

Waiting for one of his defenders to come and justify this crap
 

SheHateMe

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2012
7,251
20
81
Agree. There is no point to this nonsense especially considering all the tax dollars that are wasted for this crap. Nice to see that obama cares about the taxpayers

Waiting for one of his defenders to come and justify this crap

Yes, because Obama is the first 2nd term President ever to have a second Inauguration.

Please, say something else stupid..it's very entertaining.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Yes, because Obama is the first 2nd term President ever to have a second Inauguration.

Please, say something else stupid..it's very entertaining.

Were not talking about past presidents but the current crap we have now. This is a waste of tax dollars, does this man have any shame? Why cant he pay for it himself? Why should the taxpayer be forced to pay for this?
 

SheHateMe

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2012
7,251
20
81
Were not talking about past presidents but the current crap we have now. This is a waste of tax dollars, does this man have any shame? Why cant he pay for it himself? Why should the taxpayer be forced to pay for this?

So, its okay that all the other 2nd term Presidents had second inaugurations on the tax payers dime but Obama has to pay because YOU don't think its fair.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
So, its okay that all the other 2nd term Presidents had second inaugurations on the tax payers dime but Obama has to pay because YOU don't think its fair.

None of them should have the tax payer pay for it, Why do you keep deflecting? I might as well be debating an obama spokesman
 

SheHateMe

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2012
7,251
20
81
None of them should have the tax payer pay for it, Why do you keep deflecting? I might as well be debating an obama spokesman

How am I deflecting?, I am responding directly to your shenanigans.

You have a very basic line of thinking and you swear up and down that everyone else has the problem and not you.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,076
9,554
146
None of them should have the tax payer pay for it, Why do you keep deflecting? I might as well be debating an obama spokesman

See this is what you repeatedly do. You attack Obama at a very personal level for things that every president has done and never question the practice itself until called on it. That's why it seems to people you feel Obama should play by different rules. You do this all the time.

How about you attack the practice as a whole and not the man? Then it might seem like your interest are more than just finding another reason to attack Obama.
 
Last edited:

SheHateMe

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2012
7,251
20
81
I still haven't seen Incorruptible type out an intelligent argument against Obama. He just lets smart posters make an argument and then he will pretend like he knows what all of it means.
 

Brigandier

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2008
4,394
2
81
Guys, random people don't win the lottery. Get over it, I wouldn't be surprised if eskimospy was Obama himself.
 

drebo

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,034
1
81
See this is what you repeatedly do. You attack Obama at a very personal level for things that every president has done and never question the practice itself until called on it. That's why it seems to people you feel Obama should play by different rules. You do this all the time.

How about you attach the practice as a whole and not the man? Then it might seem like your interest are more than just finding another reason to attack Obama.

So because everyone else did it before, it's OK for Obama to do it now?

No, I don't think so.

I never approved of inaugurations for second-term presidents. Dog and pony show doesn't sit right with me at all.

He's not a celebrity, he's a failed leader (much like some other recent two term presidents.) We shouldn't be celebrating that.

Take the ~$1B it's going to cost to put the stupid thing on and send out a check for $100 to every tax payer. It'd go a lot further to raising his approval numbers.