-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
In some cases abortion should be mandatory
- Thread starter Onceler
- Start date
StageLeft
No Lifer
I can't really condone state-forced abortions, seems a hard line to cross.
If, however, it's possible to inject girls with some kind of auto-infertility drug that can only be reversed when they're 21 and meet various criteria, we could in one generation do away with all the poories and lowers, as only the optimal are allowed at that point to breed. I suppose it's similar to what you're saying but without any distasteful aspects.
If, however, it's possible to inject girls with some kind of auto-infertility drug that can only be reversed when they're 21 and meet various criteria, we could in one generation do away with all the poories and lowers, as only the optimal are allowed at that point to breed. I suppose it's similar to what you're saying but without any distasteful aspects.
Huh? While abortion is the one issue I stay away from here, I think one thing both sides mostly agree on is that their position applies whethere the child is from rape, or not.
Certainly, the pro-choice people virtually universally believe that - and the principled pro-life people would need to answer, 'why should an innocent child pay for his father's crime?'
There is an emotional argument, though, that says that because the mother suffers more burdens in this case, that it 'just seems cruel' to enforce the pro-life principles.
Certainly, the pro-choice people virtually universally believe that - and the principled pro-life people would need to answer, 'why should an innocent child pay for his father's crime?'
There is an emotional argument, though, that says that because the mother suffers more burdens in this case, that it 'just seems cruel' to enforce the pro-life principles.
Possessed Freak
Diamond Member
I see no reason why it shouldn't remain the woman's choice. If for whatever reason she wants it, why take it from her?
DealMonkey
Lifer
Forcing a woman to have an abortion is just as bad as refusing to allow her to have one if she so chooses.
fleshconsumed
Diamond Member
It should be up to the woman. I would assume most would choose abortion, but if for some reason she wants to have a child, let her.
soccerballtux
Lifer
Excuse me? You think I should have been aborted? My very loving mother chose to keep me and I'm glad she did. I take great offense at your assertion, I really do, and would appreciate it if you would stop, for the sake of others like me.
soccerballtux
Lifer
Problem is we wouldn't have anyone to do the grunt work.
StageLeft
No Lifer
Well, yeah, it's distasteful if you call it eugenics and morally abhorrent. That's why it needs a name like the "Citizen Quality Reinforcement Initiative".
Sure we would. If it's government run, there would be slips through the cracks. Those kids who slip through and shouldn't have can still do the grunt work. Since there will be less of them they'll have to work probably 110 hours/week, though.
JohnOfSheffield
Lifer
Suicide is your only opntion, think of it as late abortion.
The CHOICE is what matters and it's always the womans choice, those who don't get that should be aborted even if they are born.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
-
-
