In Prompt To

[TooOne21]

If someone told you to do something "In prompt to" what do they mean?

 

[Orsorum]

Link

 

[blackdogdeek]

impromptu

 

[HardcoreRobot]

isnt it impromptu or something?

i think it means "without planning"

 

[GasX]

For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

😀

 

[bunker]

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

😀:laugh:

 

[DaveSimmons]

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

Here here!

But it's a mute point.

 

[MrDudeMan]

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.

... My sarcasm meter just exploded.

 

[TooOne21]

So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?

I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.

 

[MrDudeMan]

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.

... My sarcasm meter just exploded.

i just dont get add hawk...i havent seen that anywhere or anything even close to it on the forums.

and i was simply asking if he meant to type intents and purposes wrong, so chill out.

 

[MrDudeMan]

Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?

I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.

that sounds like a retarded way to use that word, no offense. i wouldnt have worded it like that.

edit: that is one of those times where a big word just makes it sound unintelligent.

 

[TooOne21]

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?

I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.

that sounds like a retarded way to use that word, no offense. i wouldnt have worded it like that.

edit: that is one of those times where a big word just makes it sound unintelligent.

Understood. I should dumb it down for secretaries then right?

EDIT: PUT A SIXTH LINE IN THERE.

 

[FoBoT]

Originally posted by: DaveSimmons

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

Here here!

But it's a mute point.

:laugh:
:laugh:
:laugh:
:laugh:
:laugh:
:laugh:

 

[GasX]

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.

... My sarcasm meter just exploded.

i just dont get add hawk...i havent seen that anywhere or anything even close to it on the forums.

and i was simply asking if he meant to type intents and purposes wrong, so chill out.

FYI - absolutely everything about my post is wrong, so you calling me an idiot is like putting the carrot in front of the cart.

FYI#2 It's "ad hoc"

 

[jagec]

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
i just dont get add hawk...i havent seen that anywhere or anything even close to it on the forums.

and i was simply asking if he meant to type intents and purposes wrong, so chill out.

Intents and purposes
Impromptu
Ad hoc

 

[GasX]

Originally posted by: TooOne21

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?

I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.

that sounds like a retarded way to use that word, no offense. i wouldnt have worded it like that.

edit: that is one of those times where a big word just makes it sound unintelligent.

Understood. I should dumb it down for secretaries then right?

EDIT: PUT A SIXTH LINE IN THERE.

Dumbing what you said down would require a roomful of ducknuts working 24 hours a day for a month.

 

[3chordcharlie]

you hold impromptu meetings... you don't install impromptu phone lines 😉

 

[Kyteland]

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.

... My sarcasm meter just exploded.

i just dont get add hawk...i havent seen that anywhere or anything even close to it on the forums.

and i was simply asking if he meant to type intents and purposes wrong, so chill out.

ad hoc

Common Errors in English

 

[Phoenix86]

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"

i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.

... My sarcasm meter just exploded.

i just dont get add hawk...i havent seen that anywhere or anything even close to it on the forums.

and i was simply asking if he meant to type intents and purposes wrong, so chill out.

That's ok, this is a time where your ignorance just make you sound unintelligent.

In prompt to != impormptu just like intensive purpose != intent and purpose and add hawk != ad hoc. Mwilding made a funny, not like funny ha, but like funny lol.

Your replies are funnier, like funny "ha-ha!" </nelson>

 

[TooOne21]

Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
you hold impromptu meetings... you don't install impromptu phone lines 😉

I use it for that too.

Poor choice on my part using it for phone lines. But my brain must have just used it thinking that it was not a planned situation.

 

[SpunkyJones]

Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?

I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.

You don't need impromtu in the sentence, it makes more sense without it.

 

[TooOne21]

Originally posted by: Mwilding

Originally posted by: TooOne21

Originally posted by: MrDudeMan

Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?

I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.

that sounds like a retarded way to use that word, no offense. i wouldnt have worded it like that.

edit: that is one of those times where a big word just makes it sound unintelligent.

Understood. I should dumb it down for secretaries then right?

EDIT: PUT A SIXTH LINE IN THERE.

Dumbing what you said down would require a roomful of ducknuts working 24 hours a day for a month.

Riiiiighhhht? A parent lee you need to dumb that down for me to understand what you just said.

It was a simple question "Would you eat the moon if it were made of BBQ'd spare ribs?, Just say yes and will move on."

 

[GasX]

Originally posted by: TooOne21

Originally posted by: MwildingDumbing what you said down would require a roomful of ducknuts working 24 hours a day for a month.

Riiiiighhhht? A parent lee you need to dumb that down for me to understand what you just said.

It was a simple question "Would you eat the moon if it were made of BBQ'd spare ribs?, Just say yes and will move on."

Read what you wrote again:

So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?

Do you honestly think that is proper use of the English language - even forgiving the previously discussed misuse of the word immpromptu?