Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
Here here!Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.
... My sarcasm meter just exploded.
Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?
I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?
I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.
that sounds like a retarded way to use that word, no offense. i wouldnt have worded it like that.
edit: that is one of those times where a big word just makes it sound unintelligent.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Here here!Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
But it's a mute point.
FYI - absolutely everything about my post is wrong, so you calling me an idiot is like putting the carrot in front of the cart.Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.
... My sarcasm meter just exploded.
i just dont get add hawk...i havent seen that anywhere or anything even close to it on the forums.
and i was simply asking if he meant to type intents and purposes wrong, so chill out.
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
i just dont get add hawk...i havent seen that anywhere or anything even close to it on the forums.
and i was simply asking if he meant to type intents and purposes wrong, so chill out.
Dumbing what you said down would require a roomful of ducknuts working 24 hours a day for a month.Originally posted by: TooOne21
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?
I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.
that sounds like a retarded way to use that word, no offense. i wouldnt have worded it like that.
edit: that is one of those times where a big word just makes it sound unintelligent.
Understood. I should dumb it down for secretaries then right?
EDIT: PUT A SIXTH LINE IN THERE.
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.
... My sarcasm meter just exploded.
i just dont get add hawk...i havent seen that anywhere or anything even close to it on the forums.
and i was simply asking if he meant to type intents and purposes wrong, so chill out.
That's ok, this is a time where your ignorance just make you sound unintelligent.Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Mwilding
For all intensive purposes, "in prompt to" is equivalently the same as "add hawk"
i dont get teh funny in this one, but were you supposed to type "intensive purposes" instead of "intents and purposes" for teh funny? if so...ha...if not, you idiot.
... My sarcasm meter just exploded.
i just dont get add hawk...i havent seen that anywhere or anything even close to it on the forums.
and i was simply asking if he meant to type intents and purposes wrong, so chill out.
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
you hold impromptu meetings... you don't install impromptu phone lines![]()
Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?
I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.
Riiiiighhhht? A parent lee you need to dumb that down for me to understand what you just said.Originally posted by: Mwilding
Dumbing what you said down would require a roomful of ducknuts working 24 hours a day for a month.Originally posted by: TooOne21
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: TooOne21
So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?
I just wanted to make sure I have been using this word correctly all these years.
that sounds like a retarded way to use that word, no offense. i wouldnt have worded it like that.
edit: that is one of those times where a big word just makes it sound unintelligent.
Understood. I should dumb it down for secretaries then right?
EDIT: PUT A SIXTH LINE IN THERE.
Read what you wrote again:Originally posted by: TooOne21
Riiiiighhhht? A parent lee you need to dumb that down for me to understand what you just said.Originally posted by: MwildingDumbing what you said down would require a roomful of ducknuts working 24 hours a day for a month.
It was a simple question "Would you eat the moon if it were made of BBQ'd spare ribs?, Just say yes and will move on."
Do you honestly think that is proper use of the English language - even forgiving the previously discussed misuse of the word immpromptu?So by me saying "Can you add a sixth phone line impromtu while the phone company is out there?" was not my fault in the communication?
