Just because I post in a fantasy thread doesn't mean I support it in reality.
For the exercise of this threads topics I have assumed certain things have happened in order for us to get to a point where guns are being confiscated.
My comments are in that context. It appears other posters comments aren't in the same context.
Do you understand this?
I guess you lack the imagination to even think beyond one element of a fantasy scenario, it's only the part you find appealing that you think through.
Let's consider the news articles and posts on ATPN the day after the 2nd Amendment is repealed and all firearms confiscated.
* Ivwshane, Eskimospy, etc. post self-congratulatory threads. Hooray, take that right wing gun nuts!
* Same people feel suddenly safer and convinced the scourge of gun violence will finally end
* Massive police raids occur to sweep firearms from the inner city as they weren't turned in voluntarily by the local drug dealers and gangs. Extreme police brutality results and the residents fight back, making the LA Riots look like child's play. The National Guard is called into the Top 50 U.S. cities with more to come. Baltimore begins to look like Baghdad, up to a whole "Green Zone" sector.
* A healthy percentage of suburban and rural gun owners refuse to participate and turn in their guns, with local police forces both unwilling and unable to go door-to-door to enforce the order.
* POTUS cites the enabling legislation clause of the 28th Amendment (repealing the 2nd) to nationalize firearms and ammunition makers.
* Citizen partisan organizations evolve to actively fight back against a federal government seen as tyrannical. Even if limited to a small fraction of the population (say half of one percent) that's still 1.5 million resistance fighters. Federal buildings get bombed, judges and legislators are targeted and some killed.
* The federal government loses control of large geographical areas of several red states. Current firearm owners in places like Montana and Idaho have the will, local knowledge, and most importantly the firepower to impose sovereignty. Federal military forces can hold existing bases and other small site federal properties, but not much else.
* Gun violence goes way up, confounding the dreams and aspirations of the progressives who proposed the Amendment in the first place. They urge the POTUS to declare martial law to forcibly stamp out resistance to the 28th Amendment.
* Inner city residents fight back, heeding the call of community leaders to "take the fight outside your own community." Violence and property crimes against upscale whites in gentrified and wealthy areas spike several orders of magnitude. In Chicago, murder rates triple, with almost all the increase being minorities killing whites.
I could go on, but I hopefully now the anti-gun might start seeing the reality of their wet dream fantasy scenario.