Impromptu iPhone photoshoot: MKIV Supra & e36 M3

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
You are pathetic. Truly a lost cause. #3, 4, and 5 of your circled examples are not cambered or stretched. Is that the best you can do, really? Again, pathetic.

Here's another view of car #5 for your viewing pleasure.

Aggressive Stance Acura RSX | MyRideisMe.com
8xovo7.jpg
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,477
6,317
126
serious question...

is it common for people who make acuras have 'agressive stances' to debadge it and rebadge it with honda emblems?
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
so people take infiniti badges off and put nissan badges on instead?


Saw a guy with a datsun tags on a 240sx once. Made me laff.


Alot of guys put fairlady tags on their 300zx.


I didnt even tough the entire front half of my car is jdm hehe
 

Sunny129

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2000
4,823
6
81
35164d1268722523-aggressive-stance-thread-srt-7.jpg


Bagged. No stretching or camber detected.
...and that's why that car isn't stanced...its just slammed, and nothing more. an aggressive stance requires wheels that are at least flush w/ the fender, and sometimes poke out of the fender a bit. the wheels on the car you call "aggressively stanced" are not flush w/ the fenders - they sit inside the fenders to keep the tires from rubbing on them. if they were flush w/ the fenders, the owner would have to run stretched tires...or else the sidewalls would be nearly perpendicular to the ground, and they'd rub the fenders (or worse) under compression of the suspension. sorry, but that's not an aggressive stance (or stanced period if you ask me).


I am truly dumbfounded at the hostility here.
so are we...and what's even more dumbfounding than that is the fact that most hostile person in the thread (you) is complaining about it:
You are pathetic.
Your level of delusion is truly disturbing. Again, spend some time with the dictionary...aggressive and stance. Then do some thinking, yeah, its hard for you, but try it. Aggressive is an adjective modifier on the noun stance. An aggressive stance is one of action, if you can not understand this i doubt you can understand 3rd grade English. Thats when i learned this...

you're the only one who has slung insults around, calling members pathetic and poking fun at people's capacity to understand 3rd grade English and their mental capacity in general, when you can't even punctuate or spell correctly yourself...but if that's really how you feel, please go on. your own hypocrisy only makes you look like more of an ass as you continue to ramble on...

stay tuned guys...more Lulz are sure to come ;)
 

Sunny129

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2000
4,823
6
81
I was referring to those ridiculous rears.

Oh, and:

stance
noun
1.
the position or bearing of the body while standing: legs spread in a wide stance; the threatening stance of the bull.

The stock M3 stands aggressively. Crushing it into the ground up to its roofline or putting 20 foot axles on it so it looks like a water bug would not fit the definition of "aggressive" in reference to the bearing of the car.
That car is way out of proportion.
An M3 can definitely be made to have a more aggressive stance than stock but that's not the way to do it.
well now we're getting somewhere. first of all, i thought you were talking about the M Coupe, not the M3 (since you quoted the picture of the M Coupe just before commenting). either way, at least we can reconcile our differences in opinion now that you've elaborated. again, you're going off the generalized definition that would be found in a dictionary somewhere...sorry, but in the context of automotive enthusiasm, its meaning is a bit more specific than that. it may be your opinion that such cars with flush wheels and enough of a drop to eliminate any granny gap are not aggressively stanced. but that's exactly what a "stanced" car is, regardless of what dictionary.com says. it is what the entirety of the automotive community understands as "stanced" simply b/c it has come to be defined that way in this context over the years.

i understand that, in your opinion, a stock M3 is more aggressively stanced than the example in this thread...and that's a perfectly valid opinion. all i'm saying is that it doesn't make my brother's M3 not aggressively stanced, particularly when the majority of the automotive community understands that look to be "aggressively stanced."

WOW, i just realized that we're having a disagreement, and yet we both know how to keep it civil! i wish everyone in this thread were able to do so without resorting to low blows...
 

homercles337

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2004
6,340
3
71
well now we're getting somewhere.

You are the guy with stretched, cambered junk claiming its not junk. WE, the car community, think its junk. Enjoy your junk. I never once said anything derogatory toward you or your cars. The fact that you think i did means you are very touchy on this subject, which is probably also why you feel attacked. I never did anything to warrant your crying or crying of other girls here. Simple question, what is your problem?
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
You are the guy with stretched, cambered junk claiming its not junk. WE, the car community, think its junk. Enjoy your junk. I never once said anything derogatory toward you or your cars. The fact that you think i did means you are very touchy on this subject, which is probably also why you feel attacked. I never did anything to warrant your crying or crying of other girls here. Simple question, what is your problem?

/facepalm
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
M3 looks nice, yet hideous with that wheel setup. Whatever though, live and let live. MK4 FTW.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Has this devolved into herrafrush retardation flamefest yet?

Let me contribute:
hellaflush.jpg

herrafrush.jpg

images

booo_v2.jpg
 
Last edited: