Originally posted by: Stark
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: Vic
If China joined the war in Iraq, I'd say there's a 99.99999% chance they'd be fighting alongside the Iraqis... and against US.
there's a very slim chance of china joining the war, but i'd say you're 99.99999999% wrong and have no clue what you're talking about.
Saddam in power in an Iraq with no restrictions is better for Chinese business than a liberated Iraq with the US running the show.
That's why China wanted to ease restrictions, dooming the inspection process. I'd say Vic has a legitimate point. Thankfully China won't get involved.
Originally posted by: Trinitron
China has no way to get its ground forces to Iraq. Besides the Chinese don't give a crap about anyone but themselves, they just want to be left alone.
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: Stark
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: Vic
If China joined the war in Iraq, I'd say there's a 99.99999% chance they'd be fighting alongside the Iraqis... and against US.
there's a very slim chance of china joining the war, but i'd say you're 99.99999999% wrong and have no clue what you're talking about.
Saddam in power in an Iraq with no restrictions is better for Chinese business than a liberated Iraq with the US running the show.
That's why China wanted to ease restrictions, dooming the inspection process. I'd say Vic has a legitimate point. Thankfully China won't get involved.
perhaps, but that doesn't mean china would go to war with the US over it.
Originally posted by: jjones
China gains nothing of substance. They gain much more by their mild opposition to US actions and by staying out of conflicts in the Mideast. I think that behind closed doors they are getting a good chuckle out of all this.Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: DDCSpeed
Sending out troops and fighting the war (pricey) is not in their best interest when they have nothing to gain from it.
well technically they would gain something... the question is whether the cost outweighs the gain or not. china has had problems with muslim extremists/terrorists for quite a long time... assuming there is a connection between iraq and terrorism (i have no clue, this is just what people tell me), china would be glad to see that connection cut.
Originally posted by: DurocShark
Originally posted by: Trinitron
China has no way to get its ground forces to Iraq. Besides the Chinese don't give a crap about anyone but themselves, they just want to be left alone.
That's not totally true... China is the last signifigant communist nation, and is scared sh!tless. They're playing every game they can find in hopes of strengthening their position.
If they ever build some confidence, you can bet Taiwan (white china) will be invaded by the ROC (red china). China covets Taiwan's industrial base.
You'd think these communist nations would have figured it out: Communism does NOT foster industrial and financial growth. Taiwan: Strong industrial nation. ROC: lots of poor people. Same cultures. Sigh.
If they ever build some confidence, you can bet Taiwan (white china) will be invaded by the ROC (red china). China covets Taiwan's industrial base.
Originally posted by: DurocShark
Originally posted by: Trinitron
China has no way to get its ground forces to Iraq. Besides the Chinese don't give a crap about anyone but themselves, they just want to be left alone.
That's not totally true... China is the last signifigant communist nation, and is scared sh!tless. They're playing every game they can find in hopes of strengthening their position.
If they ever build some confidence, you can bet Taiwan (white china) will be invaded by the ROC (red china). China covets Taiwan's industrial base.
You'd think these communist nations would have figured it out: Communism does NOT foster industrial and financial growth. Taiwan: Strong industrial nation. ROC: lots of poor people. Same cultures. Sigh.
Thanks.Originally posted by: Stark
Saddam in power in an Iraq with no restrictions is better for Chinese business than a liberated Iraq with the US running the show.Originally posted by: gopunk
there's a very slim chance of china joining the war, but i'd say you're 99.99999999% wrong and have no clue what you're talking about.Originally posted by: Vic
If China joined the war in Iraq, I'd say there's a 99.99999% chance they'd be fighting alongside the Iraqis... and against US.
That's why China wanted to ease restrictions, dooming the inspection process. I'd say Vic has a legitimate point. Thankfully China won't get involved.
Thanks.
BTW, I edited the quoted text here to highlight the "IF." I strongly believe that China won't get involved. BUT, they have also made it abundantly clear that they do not support the US action in Iraq.
As bad as our american men's team plays soccer they should have just challenged the marines to a soccer match, they'd have found something they could mop the floor with us at 😛Originally posted by: everman
The 300,000 troops already there are scaring the crap out of some Iraqi troops (heard another story of some trying to surrender to marines playing soccer, marines had to turn them down but they may have arranged something).
I think that you fail to see or understand the truer causes of this upcoming war. It is possible, if both (1) the US attacks without UN approval, as it appears that we will do certainly do tomorrow evening, and (2) this war becomes prolonged and/or spreads outside of Iraq, that the US will be held at fault, will be seen by the world as the "rogue nation."Originally posted by: gopunk
so have france and germany... but i would still find it more likely that they side with the US than iraq, if they were to enter the war.Thanks.
BTW, I edited the quoted text here to highlight the "IF." I strongly believe that China won't get involved. BUT, they have also made it abundantly clear that they do not support the US action in Iraq.
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
As bad as our american men's team plays soccer they should have just challenged the marines to a soccer match, they'd have found something they could mop the floor with us at 😛Originally posted by: everman
The 300,000 troops already there are scaring the crap out of some Iraqi troops (heard another story of some trying to surrender to marines playing soccer, marines had to turn them down but they may have arranged something).
I think that you fail to see or understand the truer causes of this upcoming war. It is possible, if both (1) the US attacks without UN approval, as it appears that we will do certainly do tomorrow evening, and (2) this war becomes prolonged and/or spreads outside of Iraq, that the US will be held at fault, will be seen by the world as the "rogue nation."
I'm quite sure that you (or at least someone out there 😉 ) consider my comments (in some form of black-and-white thinking) as anti-US. Trust me, they're not. I am very pro-US but also very anti-idiot-sheep. While the US populace is in fear that "terrorists" from the whole world will attack us, the rest of the world is becoming more and more terrified of the increasingly uncontrollable and unpredictable behavior of the "New Rome." That is why so many nations (who would have otherwise supported us) are NOT supporting us now.
Someone needs to tell GW and a good percentage of the US populace to calm down and take a step back, let the peace process work. We are not defending, we are attacking. The rest of the world sees the US as the aggressors in this development and it is unsettling an already unstable geopolitical environment.
I won't argue the point. But China has already stated their outrage against the US for the upcoming war, both in the recent past and especially today. I think it would be pretty silly to assume that they would enter on our side either, don't you think?Originally posted by: gopunk
and i think neither you nor i are in a position to claim to know or understand the "true" cause of this war. for any of us to make comments as to why america is choosing to engage in this war, would be pure speculation.
but let us not get carried away here, to think that china would fight against the US in the unlikely event that they enter the war, is kind of silly.
Originally posted by: Trinitron
China has a very small navy, very small. The CIA reported they have about six ships in their entire navy, no air craft carries and no troop carriers. China has a 10,000,000 man infantry army - this army is to control their population of 1,284,303,705 people. If you want to have a communist dictator ship you have to have a way to control the people, and China has 10 mil. men to do this. China is not interested in going to war outside their borders. Period.
Originally posted by: Vic
I won't argue the point. But China has already stated their outrage against the US for the upcoming war, both in the recent past and especially today. I think it would be pretty silly to assume that they would enter on our side either, don't you think?Originally posted by: gopunk
and i think neither you nor i are in a position to claim to know or understand the "true" cause of this war. for any of us to make comments as to why america is choosing to engage in this war, would be pure speculation.
but let us not get carried away here, to think that china would fight against the US in the unlikely event that they enter the war, is kind of silly.
Originally posted by: DurocShark
Originally posted by: Trinitron
China has no way to get its ground forces to Iraq. Besides the Chinese don't give a crap about anyone but themselves, they just want to be left alone.
That's not totally true... China is the last signifigant communist nation, and is scared sh!tless. They're playing every game they can find in hopes of strengthening their position.
If they ever build some confidence, you can bet Taiwan (white china) will be invaded by the ROC (red china). China covets Taiwan's industrial base.
You'd think these communist nations would have figured it out: Communism does NOT foster industrial and financial growth. Taiwan: Strong industrial nation. ROC: lots of poor people. Same cultures. Sigh.