Illegals getting deported in Irving

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
I'm wondering what America would like like today if the Mexicans, Apaches, Navajoes, Cherokees, Seminoles, etc. would have had enforced stricter immigration laws and policies?
It would be a welcome change to see them attempt to take back the land by force. Instead, they are simply trying to breed us out of the SW states... and people like you defend their right to do so.

The good news is that people from every part of the political spectrum are sick of the illegal immigration situation.

AFAIC, they should be deported and sent to the back of the line to enter legally. Once the exact same people are here legally, they deserve every right and freedom America has to offer. Until then, they are foreign criminals...

See, this is the mindset of those that are unable to apply critical thinking skills to themselves.

You, being military, have bought into the story that there has to be an enemy so that you can justify your existence. This is simply not true. You can work towards making the planet a better place by helping to bring the inhabitants together instead of trying to tear them apart in some symbolic "us vs. them" antiquated thought process.

I am constantly amazed that "conservatives" and "liberals" alike claim to want government out of their business, their pockets and their lives and yet cannot see that their own philosophies on existence and what would be a great life are completely dependent on the opposite.

We cannot be truly free as a society or race (human kind not any "color spectrum" kind) until we admonish the concept of nations and borders. As long as we have them, we will have to have "leaders" to implement laws to "protect" them at our own expense.

Disclaimer: I am not advocating total chaos and/or anarchy. I believe that your rights are not greater than anyone else's rights and should not infringe on them (ie. no murder, theft, etc.)

Now, let's all hold hands and sing Kumbayah.

 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
We cannot be truly free as a society or race (human kind not any "color spectrum" kind) until we admonish the concept of nations and borders. As long as we have them, we will have to have "leaders" to implement laws to "protect" them at our own expense.

Disclaimer: I am not advocating total chaos and/or anarchy. I believe that your rights are not greater than anyone else's rights and should not infringe on them (ie. no murder, theft, etc.)
Yet the utopian world you suggest would eventually revert to chaos...either that, or a survival of the fittest natural hierarchy.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
More than 1,000 protesters, most Hispanic, gathered outside Irving City Hall last week to raise concerns about racial profiling and about deportations separating families.

since wh
en is illegal mexicans a race?

typical PC Bullsh*t. control the language = control the argument.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
We cannot be truly free as a society or race (human kind not any "color spectrum" kind) until we admonish the concept of nations and borders. As long as we have them, we will have to have "leaders" to implement laws to "protect" them at our own expense.

Where do you live? I'd like to sleep on your couch and eat your food for the next few years.
 

Zedtom

Platinum Member
Nov 23, 2001
2,146
0
0
The era we are living in is the age of victimization. Any group or individual who doesn't get treated like royalty is eligible for victim status.

Sometimes I wonder about Thomas Jefferson putting forth the idea that all men are created equal. Look what America has turned into.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
We cannot be truly free as a society or race (human kind not any "color spectrum" kind) until we admonish the concept of nations and borders. As long as we have them, we will have to have "leaders" to implement laws to "protect" them at our own expense.

Where do you live? I'd like to sleep on your couch and eat your food for the next few years.

has to be some old outdated hippie commune.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: Zedtom
The era we are living in is the age of victimization. Any group or individual who doesn't get treated like royalty is eligible for victim status.

Sometimes I wonder about Thomas Jefferson putting forth the idea that all men are created equal. Look what America has turned into.

ummm What?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,768
6,770
126
Originally posted by: Zedtom
The era we are living in is the age of victimization. Any group or individual who doesn't get treated like royalty is eligible for victim status.

Sometimes I wonder about Thomas Jefferson putting forth the idea that all men are created equal. Look what America has turned into.

He didn't want superior people like me putting you our of your misery.
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
We cannot be truly free as a society or race (human kind not any "color spectrum" kind) until we admonish the concept of nations and borders. As long as we have them, we will have to have "leaders" to implement laws to "protect" them at our own expense.

Disclaimer: I am not advocating total chaos and/or anarchy. I believe that your rights are not greater than anyone else's rights and should not infringe on them (ie. no murder, theft, etc.)

Once you remove the concept of nations, then that concept can be expanded to the concept of any community.

Destroy the common element and you will have chaos.
Human nature is to bond into common groups.
If there is an invader that desires something of yours, you should be able to repel/prevent the situation.
And logically, if you belong to a common group, you should defend the common area and possible share the responsibliy of protecting the belongings of the members of the group.

Nice reply.

I can see where you are coming from and agree that within the confines of our current concepts of property and right and wrong how it would lead to just what you are supposing.

I do think that we could still bond into groups but that what really needs to change is the mindset up owning property.

We have always had wars because groups have always needed something that another group has had. Whether that be food, shelter, resources, etc, it doesn't really matter. What I will never see in my lifetime or through my children's eyes in their lifetime however, is the concept of equality and sharing so that we don't have people spending $5000 on an Evian bath while others while others are so poor that they are being exploited by others to exploit even more to donate money to some phony charity to help them out.

I guess I am thinking that communism and socialism mixed would create a wonderful world to live in if only it didn't require man to administer it. Because, as you and I and everyone over the age of puberty knows, we are a inherently corrupt and selfish breed. We cannot trust others to be caretakers of this Utopia because it would eventually end up with them taking care of themselves first.

Disclaimer #2: I am not calling for the past incarnations of communism or socialism. They were/are products of our current mindset that I am referring to above. Save the "pinko" remarks and respond accordingly as CommonCourtesy did above.
 

Zedtom

Platinum Member
Nov 23, 2001
2,146
0
0
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Zedtom
The era we are living in is the age of victimization. Any group or individual who doesn't get treated like royalty is eligible for victim status.

Sometimes I wonder about Thomas Jefferson putting forth the idea that all men are created equal. Look what America has turned into.

ummm What?

I'm trying to compare the American idea of equality to the reality that there is class distinction, (discrimination), everywhere in society.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Schools draw Federal $$ based on the number of students, not their color.

The schools also hire staff based on the students enrolled, not their color.

Where the ratio of illegals is minimal the impact is small.

For towns that are supported by illegals, the impact of wasted $$ becomes large.

For schools:
Staff has to be fired/let go, improvements based on anticipated Fed $$ get postponed.

For businesses:
Loss of customers impacts their bottom line, potentially letting go legal workers with a ripple effect throughout the community.

The more illegals there are the more school taxes on legal americans.

The citizens of Irving should be thrilled their invaders that caused their taxes to go through the roof are being tossed out.

Next year the school taxes better go back down.
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
We cannot be truly free as a society or race (human kind not any "color spectrum" kind) until we admonish the concept of nations and borders. As long as we have them, we will have to have "leaders" to implement laws to "protect" them at our own expense.

Where do you live? I'd like to sleep on your couch and eat your food for the next few years.

has to be some old outdated hippie commune.

Nope. Just not under the restraints of group think. You should try it sometime, you might actually like it.

I live in the agony of my thoughts. Knowing that others are being repressed because they are unable to think for themselves and that I will be ridiculed for attempting to help them see that there are alternatives and I am not as willing as I would like to be about sacrificing my current "security" for their freedom.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong

See, this is the mindset of those that are unable to apply critical thinking skills to themselves.

You, being military, have bought into the story that there has to be an enemy so that you can justify your existence. This is simply not true. You can work towards making the planet a better place by helping to bring the inhabitants together instead of trying to tear them apart in some symbolic "us vs. them" antiquated thought process.

I am constantly amazed that "conservatives" and "liberals" alike claim to want government out of their business, their pockets and their lives and yet cannot see that their own philosophies on existence and what would be a great life are completely dependent on the opposite.

We cannot be truly free as a society or race (human kind not any "color spectrum" kind) until we admonish the concept of nations and borders. As long as we have them, we will have to have "leaders" to implement laws to "protect" them at our own expense.

Disclaimer: I am not advocating total chaos and/or anarchy. I believe that your rights are not greater than anyone else's rights and should not infringe on them (ie. no murder, theft, etc.)

Except, your argument falls apart because the legally elected government of Iraq and Afghanistan officially wants the US there. If officially elected Iraqi government publically told us to leave, we would be out of there pronto.

Since that hasn't happened, this argument you have holds no water.

Chuck
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,768
6,770
126
Originally posted by: Zedtom
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Zedtom
The era we are living in is the age of victimization. Any group or individual who doesn't get treated like royalty is eligible for victim status.

Sometimes I wonder about Thomas Jefferson putting forth the idea that all men are created equal. Look what America has turned into.

ummm What?

I'm trying to compare the American idea of equality to the reality that there is class distinction, (discrimination), everywhere in society.

Of course. One of the manifestations of the universality of self hate is identification, the surrender of ones true self and real identity over to some group that has a claim of worth so that one can acquire that worth vicariously. And in order for your group to be of value there have to be other groups that are comparatively less valuable.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong

Nice reply.

I can see where you are coming from and agree that within the confines of our current concepts of property and right and wrong how it would lead to just what you are supposing.

I do think that we could still bond into groups but that what really needs to change is the mindset up owning property.

We have always had wars because groups have always needed something that another group has had. Whether that be food, shelter, resources, etc, it doesn't really matter. What I will never see in my lifetime or through my children's eyes in their lifetime however, is the concept of equality and sharing so that we don't have people spending $5000 on an Evian bath while others while others are so poor that they are being exploited by others to exploit even more to donate money to some phony charity to help them out.

I guess I am thinking that communism and socialism mixed would create a wonderful world to live in if only it didn't require man to administer it. Because, as you and I and everyone over the age of puberty knows, we are a inherently corrupt and selfish breed. We cannot trust others to be caretakers of this Utopia because it would eventually end up with them taking care of themselves first.

Disclaimer #2: I am not calling for the past incarnations of communism or socialism. They were/are products of our current mindset that I am referring to above. Save the "pinko" remarks and respond accordingly as CommonCourtesy did above.

So I should work hard through grade school, high school, college, then at my job for the next 35+ years...all the while some loser is a slacker and you expect me to help him.

You must be out of your F'ing mind.

I already give to non-profit groups that help the poor, plus I donate small parts of my own limited free time to helping the less fortunate where I can.

Perhaps if millions of people here illegally would not be here, all these jobs that need doing could be filled by the so many poor people we have in this country.

How about this:

1.) Kick all the illegals out and put them at the back of the wait list to get in legally.
2.) Kick all able bodied people off welfare and provide them the same jobs we just freed up by kicking the illegals out.
3.) When the now illegals come in legally, they can have whatever jobs are still open.
4.) Mexico can sh1t for itself instead of US(A) having to prop it up by employing huge portions of its population that are willing to work.

Chuck
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: chucky2
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong

See, this is the mindset of those that are unable to apply critical thinking skills to themselves.

You, being military, have bought into the story that there has to be an enemy so that you can justify your existence. This is simply not true. You can work towards making the planet a better place by helping to bring the inhabitants together instead of trying to tear them apart in some symbolic "us vs. them" antiquated thought process.

I am constantly amazed that "conservatives" and "liberals" alike claim to want government out of their business, their pockets and their lives and yet cannot see that their own philosophies on existence and what would be a great life are completely dependent on the opposite.

We cannot be truly free as a society or race (human kind not any "color spectrum" kind) until we admonish the concept of nations and borders. As long as we have them, we will have to have "leaders" to implement laws to "protect" them at our own expense.

Disclaimer: I am not advocating total chaos and/or anarchy. I believe that your rights are not greater than anyone else's rights and should not infringe on them (ie. no murder, theft, etc.)

Except, your argument falls apart because the legally elected government of Iraq and Afghanistan officially wants the US there. If officially elected Iraqi government publically told us to leave, we would be out of there pronto.

Since that hasn't happened, this argument you have holds no water.

Chuck

It might have fallen apart if it wasn't true. However, since you and the majority of Americans are uninformed about what actually happens beyond the White House press releases on Iraq, I'll help you out:

Source

On Tuesday, without note in the U.S. media, more than half of the members of Iraq's parliament rejected the continuing occupation of their country. 144 lawmakers signed onto a legislative petition calling on the United States to set a timetable for withdrawal, according to Nassar Al-Rubaie, a spokesman for the Al Sadr movement, the nationalist Shia group that sponsored the petition.

It's a hugely significant development. Lawmakers demanding an end to the occupation now have the upper hand in the Iraqi legislature for the first time; previous attempts at a similar resolution fell just short of the 138 votes needed to pass (there are 275 members of the Iraqi parliament, but many have fled the country's civil conflict, and at times it's been difficult to arrive at a quorum).

Here's more:

Iraqi politicians have passed a resolution requiring the government to seek parliamentary permission before asking the UN to extend the mandate for US-led forces in Iraq.

The measure was approved on Tuesday and reflects a growing disenchantment with the US-backed government.

The Sadrist-drafted resolution passed with a vote of 85 to 59.

The members of parliament voted along party lines, with Sunnis joining the bloc loyal to Muqtada al-Sadr, a Shia leader, and another Shia party at odds with the leadership.

Supporters of Nuri al-Maliki, the Iraqi prime minister, opposed the resolution.



So, what time is the first flight from Baghdad?
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: chucky2
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong

Nice reply.

I can see where you are coming from and agree that within the confines of our current concepts of property and right and wrong how it would lead to just what you are supposing.

I do think that we could still bond into groups but that what really needs to change is the mindset up owning property.

We have always had wars because groups have always needed something that another group has had. Whether that be food, shelter, resources, etc, it doesn't really matter. What I will never see in my lifetime or through my children's eyes in their lifetime however, is the concept of equality and sharing so that we don't have people spending $5000 on an Evian bath while others while others are so poor that they are being exploited by others to exploit even more to donate money to some phony charity to help them out.

I guess I am thinking that communism and socialism mixed would create a wonderful world to live in if only it didn't require man to administer it. Because, as you and I and everyone over the age of puberty knows, we are a inherently corrupt and selfish breed. We cannot trust others to be caretakers of this Utopia because it would eventually end up with them taking care of themselves first.

Disclaimer #2: I am not calling for the past incarnations of communism or socialism. They were/are products of our current mindset that I am referring to above. Save the "pinko" remarks and respond accordingly as CommonCourtesy did above.

So I should work hard through grade school, high school, college, then at my job for the next 35+ years...all the while some loser is a slacker and you expect me to help him.

You must be out of your F'ing mind.

I already give to non-profit groups that help the poor, plus I donate small parts of my own limited free time to helping the less fortunate where I can.

Perhaps if millions of people here illegally would not be here, all these jobs that need doing could be filled by the so many poor people we have in this country.

How about this:

1.) Kick all the illegals out and put them at the back of the wait list to get in legally.
2.) Kick all able bodied people off welfare and provide them the same jobs we just freed up by kicking the illegals out.
3.) When the now illegals come in legally, they can have whatever jobs are still open.
4.) Mexico can sh1t for itself instead of US(A) having to prop it up by employing huge portions of its population that are willing to work.

Chuck

Once again, you think that because our ancestors VIOLENTLY STOLE THIS PROPERTY it means that we are entitled to it and everyone else has to have our permission to come here.

Since you are so big on border laws and rules, say I come over and forcibly kick you out of your house and then have my cousin move in. When you attempt to come back onto OUR PROPERTY, I will call the police and have you arrested for trespassing.

Once you are out, you can then ask if you are allowed to come over and mow the lawn once in a while.

But don't expect to be paid for it. You can drop dead before I owe you anything for attempting to trespass on MY PROPERTY.

See how silly your argument sounds when you are the one being vilified?
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Where do you live? I'd like to sleep on your couch and eat your food for the next few years.

Few years? How about a lifetime!

I'd like to open the invitation to a few future generations too!

This could be great!
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Once again, you think that because our ancestors VIOLENTLY STOLE THIS PROPERTY it means that we are entitled to it and everyone else has to have our permission to come here.

Since you are so big on border laws and rules, say I come over and forcibly kick you out of your house and then have my cousin move in. When you attempt to come back onto OUR PROPERTY, I will call the police and have you arrested for trespassing.

Once you are out, you can then ask if you are allowed to come over and mow the lawn once in a while.

But don't expect to be paid for it. You can drop dead before I owe you anything for attempting to trespass on MY PROPERTY.

See how silly your argument sounds when you are the one being vilified?
I believe that the United States obtained that section of the country legally from Mexico and Spain.
Your beef may be - did those countries have the authority to sell it?

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,768
6,770
126
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Once again, you think that because our ancestors VIOLENTLY STOLE THIS PROPERTY it means that we are entitled to it and everyone else has to have our permission to come here.

Since you are so big on border laws and rules, say I come over and forcibly kick you out of your house and then have my cousin move in. When you attempt to come back onto OUR PROPERTY, I will call the police and have you arrested for trespassing.

Once you are out, you can then ask if you are allowed to come over and mow the lawn once in a while.

But don't expect to be paid for it. You can drop dead before I owe you anything for attempting to trespass on MY PROPERTY.

See how silly your argument sounds when you are the one being vilified?
I believe that the United States obtained that section of the country legally from Mexico and Spain.
Your beef may be - did those countries have the authority to sell it?

Ah geez, they only sold because they were bribed by the money offered.

 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Once again, you think that because our ancestors VIOLENTLY STOLE THIS PROPERTY it means that we are entitled to it and everyone else has to have our permission to come here.

Since you are so big on border laws and rules, say I come over and forcibly kick you out of your house and then have my cousin move in. When you attempt to come back onto OUR PROPERTY, I will call the police and have you arrested for trespassing.

Once you are out, you can then ask if you are allowed to come over and mow the lawn once in a while.

But don't expect to be paid for it. You can drop dead before I owe you anything for attempting to trespass on MY PROPERTY.

See how silly your argument sounds when you are the one being vilified?
I believe that the United States obtained that section of the country legally from Mexico and Spain.
Your beef may be - did those countries have the authority to sell it?

And what gave Spain the "right of ownership"? When did the British Empire acquire the "right of ownership" of the east coast?

I'm not trying to imply that possession isn't 9/10 of the law, I'm trying to say stop being delusional and thinking that this country was magically "given" to us. We forcibly stole it or deceptively grabbed it from its original inhabitants. To think otherwise is being deceitful to the history of this nation and those that sacrificed everything to make it is today.

I am aware of the ways of the world and realize that might made right in previous generations. Times have changed and if some country tried to do what we did then today, we would be there attempting to stop them. Just as we did in GW1.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,852
10,165
136
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
We cannot be truly free as a society or race (human kind not any "color spectrum" kind) until we admonish the concept of nations and borders. As long as we have them, we will have to have "leaders" to implement laws to "protect" them at our own expense.

Where do you live? I'd like to sleep on your couch and eat your food for the next few years.

I'll join in, and invite everyone off the street to do the same. See how he likes home invasion.