illegal immigrants

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,630
25
91
"The first illegal immigrants in America were Pilgrims"

what ya think about that?
Quote from Pbs video "race is the place"
 

GoPackGo

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2003
6,519
595
126
Originally posted by: lyssword
"The first illegal immigrants in America were Pilgrims"

what ya think about that?
Quote from Pbs video "race is the place"

First, Show me a law?

Second, if they were correct, then naming this land "America" is racist and insulting.


 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: lyssword
"The first illegal immigrants in America were Pilgrims"

what ya think about that?
Quote from Pbs video "race is the place"

They are lying

The first immigrants were from Asia a few thousand years ago. Nice try though :)
 

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,630
25
91
its a video made to educate people about race/ism in US and that quote wasn't made by pbs, but by a native american, I don't know exactly who it was, but it reflects the view of native americans/hawaiians. Yes native americans probably didn't have a sovereign nation, it was millions of "indians" (which bythe way is probably insulting cuz they were confused with "real indians" as in asian india which has elephants and such :p) living in tribes, which were killed off of course by the immigrants
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: lyssword
"The first illegal immigrants in America were Pilgrims"

what ya think about that?
Quote from Pbs video "race is the place"
I agree.

The only difference is; the pilgrims treated the natives like crap and literally stole the country. Illegals are part of the American society; hardworking, loyal and contribute immensly to society.
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: lyssword
"The first illegal immigrants in America were Pilgrims"

what ya think about that?
Quote from Pbs video "race is the place"
I agree.

The only difference is; the pilgrims treated the natives like crap and literally stole the country. Illegals are part of the American society; hardworking, loyal and contribute immensly to society.

hmm....don't forget to shine those rose coloured glasses at night..you need them for your world. :)
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: lyssword
"The first illegal immigrants in America were Pilgrims"

what ya think about that?
Quote from Pbs video "race is the place"
I agree.

The only difference is; the pilgrims treated the natives like crap and literally stole the country. Illegals are part of the American society; hardworking, loyal and contribute immensly to society.
hmm....don't forget to shine those rose coloured glasses at night..you need them for your world. :)
My world? :confused:
 

rahvin

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,475
1
0
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Not a Sovereign nation, I would imagine we invaded over 100 sovereign nations. Most don't exist anymore. The Navaho and western Nations have survived only because they occupied undesired land at the time. How many treaties did we violate with those sovereign nations after taking their land? The Sioux Nation to this day still claims their holiest ground, the black hills, which was stolen from them after Custer violated their Sovereign nation even though the treaty from a few years earlier recognized the Sioux's claim to the black hills. The Cherokee nation tried to integrate and became successfull farmers and traders and were evicted under force of arms from their land in Georgia. So yes, in fact the Pilgrims did invade and conquer sovereign nations, many of them. That was a point of colonialism afterall.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,876
4,987
136
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.




Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.

Genocide? I don't think colonizing = genocide. I'd like to see your sources that say that American settlers set out to exterminate the Native American population of America.

And if you're talking about wars, don't bother. The Native American groups fought amongst each other all of the time. It wasn't exactly peaceful on the plains.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,876
4,987
136
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.

Genocide? I don't think colonizing = genocide. I'd like to see your sources that say that American settlers set out to exterminate the Native American population of America.

And if you're talking about wars, don't bother. The Native American groups fought amongst each other all of the time. It wasn't exactly peaceful on the plains.




Well, I'm sure Native America is convinced.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.

Genocide? I don't think colonizing = genocide. I'd like to see your sources that say that American settlers set out to exterminate the Native American population of America.

And if you're talking about wars, don't bother. The Native American groups fought amongst each other all of the time. It wasn't exactly peaceful on the plains.




Well, I'm sure Native America is convinced.

That's a whole different argument from the OP.

Fact: The pilgrims weren't illegal immigrants. They broke no law concerning immigration to come over here.

Now you can argue as to the morality of their actions once they got here. You can argue that their offspring stole land from other people and claimed it as their own. You can argue that this country was built on genocide and slavery. But what is not for debate is the status of the first white settlers being "illegal immigrants". They were not.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,876
4,987
136
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.

Genocide? I don't think colonizing = genocide. I'd like to see your sources that say that American settlers set out to exterminate the Native American population of America.

And if you're talking about wars, don't bother. The Native American groups fought amongst each other all of the time. It wasn't exactly peaceful on the plains.




Well, I'm sure Native America is convinced.

That's a whole different argument from the OP.

Fact: The pilgrims weren't illegal immigrants. They broke no law concerning immigration to come over here.

Now you can argue as to the morality of their actions once they got here. You can argue that their offspring stole land from other people and claimed it as their own. You can argue that this country was built on genocide and slavery. But what is not for debate is the status of the first white settlers being "illegal immigrants". They were not.




Well, I'm sure Native America is convinced.
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.

Genocide? I don't think colonizing = genocide. I'd like to see your sources that say that American settlers set out to exterminate the Native American population of America.

And if you're talking about wars, don't bother. The Native American groups fought amongst each other all of the time. It wasn't exactly peaceful on the plains.




Well, I'm sure Native America is convinced.

That's a whole different argument from the OP.

Fact: The pilgrims weren't illegal immigrants. They broke no law concerning immigration to come over here.

Now you can argue as to the morality of their actions once they got here. You can argue that their offspring stole land from other people and claimed it as their own. You can argue that this country was built on genocide and slavery. But what is not for debate is the status of the first white settlers being "illegal immigrants". They were not.




Well, I'm sure Native America is convinced.


Who cares? Its been a few hundred years, get over it.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.

Genocide? I don't think colonizing = genocide. I'd like to see your sources that say that American settlers set out to exterminate the Native American population of America.

And if you're talking about wars, don't bother. The Native American groups fought amongst each other all of the time. It wasn't exactly peaceful on the plains.




Well, I'm sure Native America is convinced.

That's a whole different argument from the OP.

Fact: The pilgrims weren't illegal immigrants. They broke no law concerning immigration to come over here.

Now you can argue as to the morality of their actions once they got here. You can argue that their offspring stole land from other people and claimed it as their own. You can argue that this country was built on genocide and slavery. But what is not for debate is the status of the first white settlers being "illegal immigrants". They were not.

Are you an expert on each tibes laws? You don't think that the tribes had laws saying that the land between two landmarks was for the exclusive use of the tribe?
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.

Genocide? I don't think colonizing = genocide. I'd like to see your sources that say that American settlers set out to exterminate the Native American population of America.

And if you're talking about wars, don't bother. The Native American groups fought amongst each other all of the time. It wasn't exactly peaceful on the plains.




Well, I'm sure Native America is convinced.

That's a whole different argument from the OP.

Fact: The pilgrims weren't illegal immigrants. They broke no law concerning immigration to come over here.

Now you can argue as to the morality of their actions once they got here. You can argue that their offspring stole land from other people and claimed it as their own. You can argue that this country was built on genocide and slavery. But what is not for debate is the status of the first white settlers being "illegal immigrants". They were not.

Are you an expert on each tibes laws? You don't think that the tribes had laws saying that the land between two landmarks was for the exclusive use of the tribe?

Actually I am.

With respect to the specific tribe in question their immigration code (sec. 12, paragraph 4, line 6) does indeed make reference to specific lands and defines those lands as being in the collective posession of said tribe. It goes on further (sec 12, paragraph 5) to specifically state that any other native tribe entering such lands will have a valid passport or other type of approved visa. It further states that if a member of another native tribe does not have said identification then application can be made via the statute contained in sec. 13, paragraph 1.

While the immigration laws were specific toward other native populations they did not mention anything as to the status of evil, marauding, genocidial, white-devil europeans seeking assylum from religious persecution. Therefore... the pilgrims were not, in fact, in violation of any specific immigration law.

I hope we can now put this issue to rest.
 

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,630
25
91
yep a technicality (since they were not originally aware of the white peoples they made no law for them)
ok /endtopic :p
 

spunkz

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2003
1,467
0
76
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.

Genocide? I don't think colonizing = genocide. I'd like to see your sources that say that American settlers set out to exterminate the Native American population of America.

And if you're talking about wars, don't bother. The Native American groups fought amongst each other all of the time. It wasn't exactly peaceful on the plains.




Well, I'm sure Native America is convinced.

That's a whole different argument from the OP.

Fact: The pilgrims weren't illegal immigrants. They broke no law concerning immigration to come over here.

Now you can argue as to the morality of their actions once they got here. You can argue that their offspring stole land from other people and claimed it as their own. You can argue that this country was built on genocide and slavery. But what is not for debate is the status of the first white settlers being "illegal immigrants". They were not.

Are you an expert on each tibes laws? You don't think that the tribes had laws saying that the land between two landmarks was for the exclusive use of the tribe?

Actually I am.

With respect to the specific tribe in question their immigration code (sec. 12, paragraph 4, line 6) does indeed make reference to specific lands and defines those lands as being in the collective posession of said tribe. It goes on further (sec 12, paragraph 5) to specifically state that any other native tribe entering such lands will have a valid passport or other type of approved visa. It further states that if a member of another native tribe does not have said identification then application can be made via the statute contained in sec. 13, paragraph 1.

While the immigration laws were specific toward other native populations they did not mention anything as to the status of evil, marauding, genocidial, white-devil europeans seeking assylum from religious persecution. Therefore... the pilgrims were not, in fact, in violation of any specific immigration law.

I hope we can now put this issue to rest.

before you rest your case, would u indulge me and other interested parties as to your reasoning for describing all the european settlers as evil, marauding, and genocidal. it would seem from my prior knowledge of the subject that most of the land obtained by the early colonists was done so through legitimate purchase. i don't doubt that evil men arrived on the shores of America, but i imagine they were the ones seeking land and money, not religious freedom.