IG: Some Emails on Clinton's Server Were Beyond Top Secret

[buckshot24]

The question was irreparably flawed because its premise was false.

Based on what? Your hopes and dreams?

Hillary Clinton used the email server they already had.

Maybe that's all there is to it, I have no idea. You seem to be too sure. But even if this is just neglect that doesn't change the nature of these charges.

 

[soundforbjt]

Based on what? Your hopes and dreams?
Maybe that's all there is to it, I have no idea. You seem to be too sure. But even if this is just neglect that doesn't change the nature of these charges.

What charges?

 

[buckshot24]

What charges?

This is speculation. If she has done (or if she eventually gets charged with) what some are saying she has done she won't be able to use Bowfinger's defense.

 

[OutHouse]

The question was irreparably flawed because its premise was false. Hillary Clinton used the email server they already had. It in no way was going to a "unique/unusual extent"or "an extreme measure of control." It was there and it was convenient. That's the plain answer, regardless of others' insinuation and speculation.

the question was solid and simple and yet you still spin and dodge it. thanks for the entertainment.

 

[Bowfinger]

the question was solid and simple and yet you still spin and dodge it. thanks for the entertainment.

I am happy you are so easily entertained. I gave a simple, straightforward answer. That it doesn't fit your purely partisan agenda is your problem. Feel free to continue guzzling propaganda as if it were fact. I'll be over here with the thinking class, waiting for credible information.

 

[mikeymikec]

The idea of "beyond top secret" always makes me laugh. I wonder if they need to come up with snappy-sounding terms for the latest super-duper-top-secret-xxtreme bit of info every couple of months just to keep up.

 

[Pens1566]

The idea of "beyond top secret" always makes me laugh. I wonder if they need to come up with snappy-sounding terms for the latest super-duper-top-secret-xxtreme bit of info every couple of months just to keep up.

Uh, SAP/SCI isn't a new concept.

 

[Jhhnn]

Based on what? Your hopes and dreams?
Maybe that's all there is to it, I have no idea. You seem to be too sure. But even if this is just neglect that doesn't change the nature of these charges.

The nature of the charges is that they smell funny, like bullshit. Like Birtherism, Fast & Furious, Benghazi & the IRS "scandal".

The question of why she handled her email the way she did has been asked & answered over & over again. It doesn't even matter because there is no evidence of her intent other than her own words. It's a segue to entertaining conspiracy theory & the usual chumps are all over it like flies on... bullshit.

They'll be all over the next steaming pile, too. The love of bullshit is built right into their attitudes.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

"I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received" - Hillary Clinton

 

[Jhhnn]

"I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received" - Hillary Clinton

Her detractors have offered nothing of substance to repudiate that claim. Well, unless you think that classified information leaked onto the front page of the NYT should be handled like information that hasn't been leaked or that classification after the fact means information was always classified.

Which is how they handle it in Glenbeckistan, obviously. But only for Hillary, of course.

 

[dank69]

Tom DeLay's sources at FBI says they're ready to indict. She could be guilty of all of it, but Loretta Lynch doesn't have to do it.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/tom-delay-hillary-clinton-indict-fbi/2016/01/25/id/710813/

Don't you need a Grand Jury to indict? How would the FBI go about indicting someone?

 

[fskimospy]

Her detractors have offered nothing of substance to repudiate that claim. Well, unless you think that classified information leaked onto the front page of the NYT should be handled like information that hasn't been leaked or that classification after the fact means information was always classified.

Which is how they handle it in Glenbeckistan, obviously. But only for Hillary, of course.

He's just doing the 'who, me?' thing. Any negative conclusion you attempt to draw from what he wrote/quoted he will deny and proclaim innocence.

 

[Jhhnn]

Don't you need a Grand Jury to indict? How would the FBI go about indicting someone?

It's just bullshit. Only a federal prosecutor can issue a federal indictment, either on their own or via grand jury. Well, other than maybe in some contempt cases where federal judges can do so.

Bullshit rag, bullshit source, bullshit premises and bullshit conclusions in the right wing version of simulated reality.

 

[Jhhnn]

He's just doing the 'who, me?' thing. Any negative conclusion you attempt to draw from what he wrote/quoted he will deny and proclaim innocence.

Let him. I framed it in a way contrary to his purposes. He can't avoid that context.

 

[buckshot24]

Don't you need a Grand Jury to indict? How would the FBI go about indicting someone?

This is covered in the first sentence of that article.

 

[Blackjack200]

Tom Delay would be an expert on getting indicted, of course, haha.

LMAO.

 

[norseamd]

"Beyond Top Secret"

 

[Blackjack200]

"Beyond Top Secret"

 

[Ackmed]

I have what is equivalent to a top secret clearance (Q clearance) and an actual secret clearance... I don't know of anything higher. :shrug: But who knows, maybe there is.

 

[Fern]

Yawn!!!

http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/09/09/fox-amp-friends-helps-jeb-bush-whitewash-his-re/205449

Please tell me you are capable of reading and I don't need to point out where exactly in this link backs my claims because I've already wasted enough time on this.

Pretty much what I thought: You're just parroting talking points you picked up elsewhere.

The mediamatters article doesn't even attempt to claim Bush was subject to federal laws. It mentions FL state law.

Who gives a fck? Hillary's matter concern federal law, not FL state law.

Fern

 

[Fern]

This has been explained, both in the media and here. Bill Clinton had the server set up for his email when he left the White House. Hillary Clinton chose to use it as well. Simple and convenient.

Never heard it and not buying it.

In any case, just looks a claim as to where she got the hardware (PC, case, mobo, HDD etc.). No one cares about that; it's not relevant.

Fern

 

[Fern]

The question was irreparably flawed because its premise was false. Hillary Clinton used the email server they already had. It in no way was going to a "unique/unusual extent"or "an extreme measure of control." It was there and it was convenient. That's the plain answer, regardless of others' insinuation and speculation.

BS, what was "convenient" was to let the State Dept handle it as part of their usual duties.

If one can show that another SOS (or head of CIA or DoD) declined use of an agency server and instead set up and use their own private server only then will it cease to be unique or unusual.

Fern

 

[OrByte]

Can we see more congressional hearings with that one dude with the faux-hawk? he was splashy!

I'm really looking forward to that!

 

[ivwshane]

Pretty much what I thought: You're just parroting talking points you picked up elsewhere.

The mediamatters article doesn't even attempt to claim Bush was subject to federal laws. It mentions FL state law.

Who gives a fck? Hillary's matter concern federal law, not FL state law.

Fern

For fuck sakes bro! Who the fuck said jeb violated any law? It certainly wasn't me. What laws did Clinton violate by having her own server?

Once again, nice try moving the goal posts!

Oh and the reason for linking to mediamatters is because they have multiple quotes with citations to those quotes. Of course your dumbass partisan self didn't bother looking at them.

 

[ivwshane]

Never heard it and not buying it.

In any case, just looks a claim as to where she got the hardware (PC, case, mobo, HDD etc.). No one cares about that; it's not relevant.

Fern

Oh shit did you just try to use your ignorance as a valid point for dismissing facts?

Lol!