• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

IG: Some Emails on Clinton's Server Were Beyond Top Secret

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Zorkorist said:
It's hugely important, and goes to her integrity, honesty, and ability to lead a nation.

-John
Click to expand...

Should you be judged on false claims by others? And by false I mean claims that never pan out.

If so, I think I'll have to air the things I've heard about you and the atrocities you've committed.

Show me how you aren't a hypocrite.
 
Zorkorist said:
Dude, I'm not running for office.

She, is a piece of shit.

-John
Click to expand...
But you're gonna vote for the guy who gets in petty twitter flame wars, right? Insulting other people for how they look when he has the most ridiculous toupee ever?
You.. are not smart.
 
Anybody other than Hillary, or Socialist Bernie, etc.

Won't vote for a Bush... done and over with them.

So, yes, Donald Trump.

Works for me.

-John
 
Zorkorist said:
Can someone please post a quick summary of how fucked up Hillary Clinton is?

-John
Click to expand...
In the recent debate she was asked about the influence wall street had on her, and she started rambling off 9-11 rhetoric. The only relevant factor being the state of origin.

Eventually, she was called out on it, by twitter, because apparently the moderator is incompetent. Her rebuttal was to continue to ramble off some bullshit about 9-11.

I think that sums it up nicely.

Somehow the morons in attendance ate that freshly secreted bullshit right up, and cheered.
 
Last edited:
Zorkorist said:
Anybody other than Hillary, or Socialist Bernie, etc.

Won't vote for a Bush... done and over with them.

So, yes, Donald Trump.

Works for me.

-John
Click to expand...
So, in your never-ending quest for small government, you want to put a nasty-tempered small-minded narcissistic egomaniac with a populist agenda in charge of the government.
Like I said, you are not smart.
 
This is a thread about how fucked up Hillary Clinton is.

The answer is very.

You should just go off and fuck yourself.

-John
 
mysticjbyrd said:
In the recent debate she was asked about the influence wall street had on her, and she started rambling off 9-11 rhetoric. The only relevant factor being the state of origin.

Eventually, she was called out on it, by twitter, because apparently the moderator is incompetent. Her rebuttal was to continue to ramble off some bullshit about 9-11.

I think that sums it up nicely.

Somehow the morons in attendance ate that freshly secreted bullshit right up, and cheered.
Click to expand...

Anybody who thinks that Wall St welcomes this message is out of their Hillary-hating minds-

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/wall-street/
 
Hillary and Bernie are both cries from the liberal establishment of America, that want to continue fucking everyday Americans.

They will tax and spend us to death.

No freedom.

-John
 
Jhhnn said:
So, uhh, you're claiming that Clinton and her aides didn't have the security clearance to talk about leaked information among themselves?

The best part for the nit picking ravers is that the conversation is... Classified! so we'll never know what was said. Perfect conspiracy theory material.
Click to expand...

That isn't what I was saying, but probably most of them did not with the SAP information as it isn't just the clearance level it is "The Need To Know" requirements. But that I couldn't say exactly and neither could anyone else.

What I am saying is that they violated security when the information was placed on a non-secured server and then gave the server administration up to a private company that doesn't have a security or need to know clearance.

It doesn't matter if the information was leaked or not. It is still classified and the documentation is not to be distributed outside of secure methods.

I remember back in the cold war days when The Readers Digest printed a huge article about the US Navy SSBN Weapons Systems and missiles. Loads of it was accurate and leaked information. But we were not allowed to discuss or distribute the information out of secure methods. Neither confirm nor deny is the rule of the day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top