you do know that games on the iphone have much better visuals enabled than on android?
Even with a higher resolution games still look much crappier on android.
If you want to understand, the iphone is like playing a PC game on ultra settings but with slightly lower resolution while android (esp the samsung exynos) is like playing on lowest possible settings with a slightly higher resolution.
http://iphone.appleinsider.com/arti...6-in-game-performance-better-looking-graphics
I don't love any brand and I'm not biased. Android and Iphones each have their own advantages and disatvantages. If you want openness, customization, big screens, etc then buy an android. If you want performance, responsiveness, and gaming then buy an iphone.So you're moving your goal posts? Your post was about putting a fan on an Android phone so it throttles less. If you'd like to start talking about textures and such (and I'm sure you have many ideas as an engineer), then try to do so. If you'd like to just come out and proclaim your Apple love, then just do it.
Even in your link, I'm not seeing much difference in those screenshots. Put it in a 5" form factor and I'm not sure anyone will notice.
Aren't you the one who keeps leaving troll posts on my threads?
Nice to see you again.
No, I do not want even fans on my desktop anymore. It is so 2010.
Ok let's compromise. The fan is cartridge-like, near the edge (for easy replacement), and only kicks in when plugged into the wall and 'console mode' is enabled. Clocks ramp up, more cores come online, etc. Er something. ..
The moment you put that phone in your pocket, there will be no air intake into the phone, and the phone would over heat. You know the rest of what would follow after that. That's, why phones are made, such that they do not need fans. Also, fans are noisy, and on top of that, they would use more battery power.If the cooling fan was hidden inside like this:
(this was an old apple patent for internal phone cooling that never made it into real iphones)![]()
Hypothetical:
The company who made this actively cooled phone took care not to tell anyone there was a fan inside. They knew people would freak out, as in "lololol a fan inside a phone? For what? Phones don't get hot anyway."
This is because most people don't even know that phones throttle (and some phones much more than others). Most people just use their phone for calling, messaging, browsing the net, taking selfies, etc. The only place where heat throttling would show is in graphically intensive games, and again most people won't know cause most play casual 2D games, and the ones who do play graphically intensive games do so on iphones which don't throttle because of how well the games are optimized, and the few people who would play graphically intensive games on android don't care if they throttle and become unplayable cause they don't see mobile as a real gaming platform to begin with.
So this company that released this phone starts getting flak once people realize there's this extra hardware inside that everyone hates for no particular reason, the phone fails miserably in sales despite being the only android phone in the market that doesn't exhibit heat throttling, and from then on every phone manufacturer vows never to do this kind of thing again.
The End.
Some flawed logic here. If the phone is in your pocket, odds are you aren't gaming on it anyway, or doing anything demanding for that matter, thus not enough heat being produced to even need to spin up the fan in your pocket, unless however you're doing some Folding@UrPocket.The moment you put that phone in your pocket, there will be no air intake into the phone, and the phone would over heat. You know the rest of what would follow after that. That's, why phones are made, such that they do not need fans. Also, fans are noisy, and on top of that, they would use more battery power.
The moment you put that phone in your pocket, there will be no air intake into the phone, and the phone would over heat. You know the rest of what would follow after that. That's, why phones are made, such that they do not need fans. Also, fans are noisy, and on top of that, they would use more battery power.
This is because Apple puts bigger GPUs on their SoCs than Qualcomm and Samsung do.
Some flawed logic here. If the phone is in your pocket, odds are you aren't gaming on it anyway, or doing anything demanding for that matter, thus not enough heat being produced to even need to spin up the fan in your pocket, unless however you're doing some Folding@UrPocket.
I too disagree with sticking fans on phones, but well-thought arguments are most welcome. ()![]()
On similar note, when it comes to a point that phone cpus need to be made so powerful that they need a fan, perhaps it's time to stop making the OS so bloated. Phones have rather simple purposes unlike PCs and should not even need that powerful of a cpu.
Also as a non engineer who has worked with basic electrical/electronic stuff and knows how to use a multimeter, I can guarantee you the fan will affect the battery.![]()